Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Private Insurance/100% T/p

Rate this question


Michael

Question

Good Day: I just received a letter from West Haven, VT VA, requesting that I sign a release so they can bill my private insurance for recent treatment. I am a 100% T/P rated vet(past 6 years). I have received all my treatment from this VA. 1. Should I sign this release? 2. Can VA bill my insurance with my type of 100%T/P rating. 3. Any other advice on this issue? Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you use BC/BS outside the VA the VA does not pick up the deductible. The only thing the VA does is to charge your private insurance when you go to the VA for treatment. If you are over 50% you don't have a co-pay at the VA if you have insurance or not. There is really no good reason to use the VA if you have good private insurance except to document your disabiliy and to get cheap drugs. I go to stay in the loop and to use their jive-ass pain clinic. Getting pain meds is getting harder in Florida as the state and DEA are just giving the pain doctors hell. They have the nerve to bill vets for medical care. If they can't bill you directly they bill your insurance. That pisses me off! My goldfish died too. If the VA is going to charge vets for care why have one? I know an effort was made to actually charge service connected vets for the SC stuff but that died in Congress. Just the fact that this was tried gets me mad as hell. Why not just kick us in the yarbels and be done with it? When the VA was just for service connected injuries I never went. Now that it is for all vets SC and NSC I can't get through the door even when I want to go just to get a dental check-up. We priority one vets are suppose to get the fastest care. If that is fast I hate to see slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had the same experience at the local VAMC. They can bill for NSC treatment but, then my husand is 70% not 100%....it's a disgrace if the VA doesn't pay for 100%.

Did anyone see the 60 minutes segment on the Medicare billing scandal that aired last night? Unbelieveable. Medicare Madeoff's.

VetsLady and, Proud to Be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I did not see it but I am glad when they show any kind of abuse to Medicare cause that helps clean it up.

My Medicare Advantage has paid over 30 thousand in last 2 years.Most of it was angioplasty and a stent that I would have had to wait months for at VA.

I have come to the point in my life that I am going to use VA for Routine and my own for surgery and when I don't want Med Students deciding my fate.

It seems that all the time we get less and less options.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I guess I see an advantage in staying in the loop with the VA. Worst case you would have to use them for some major uncovered medical expense. I do know they provide Human Growth Hormone to a vet I know who had his circuts burned out in an electrical accident in the military. It would cost him 6000 bucks a month he said if not for the VA.

The other advantage I see is you have an easy way to show continuity of care for any condition. You can also document potential service connected secondary conditions from SC conditions. I have done this with AO conditions. If I was working I would probably not bother even going to the VA, but since I depend on the VA check each month I want to document every single problem I have, and I want them to pay for it.

I don't see getting by-pass surgery at my VAMC. I know it is good for some, but not for me. My VAMC got in trouble for doing too many on really old and sick vets because they were training medical students. What better way than by using a poor, old vet who is already half-dead from alcoholism or incinerated lungs? That never stopped them from cutting the people open like a fish market gutting fish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
I guess I see an advantage in staying in the loop with the VA.

I agree and admire you John999, for staying in the loop. Your vast knowledge and first hand observations have enhanced the overall quality & ability of Hadit to function. I wrote the VA off, as a bad debt many years ago. However, I feel compelled to get back in the trenches, for the sake of my fellow disabled vets. Some disabilities, like the misdiagnoses of PTSD, went on for decades, before 1980 ( + ). Now all the misdiagnoses and the "cruel and unusual treatment" of the Vietnam vets of that time, is just being swept under the rug. Pretending that the VA's abuse of our most severely combat wounded, boots on the ground vets with PTSD, were treated like fakers and low-life troublemakers, during that era, cannot go on like it never happened. I stumbled onto this VA refusal to admit the misdiagnoses, when I asked to recode my PTSD, so I could draw an additional ten dollars a month CRSC retirement Army pay. The VA claims that I do not have PTSD, and that my unspecified anxiety disorder is not combat related. Ha,ha,ha,...lol... When I was 18 years old I entered a minefield to render aid to my fellow wounded brothers, I survived until the fourth explosion. Incoming fire was reported. And the VA now refuses to admit that they screwed up the rating code.. It wasn't even their fault. The whole country was ignorant about PTSD back then. Yet, today, still they will not admit they made a mistake. Unbelievable.

Edited by Commander Bob

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Vets Lady

I missed the "Medicare Madoff's" you were talking about. I bet if the new national health care plan goes through, you will be seeing a lot more

"Medicare Madoff Billionaires" who rip off taxpayers. This is what the new health care plan is about, it isnt about helping poor people get insurance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use