Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question On Inferred Claims

Rate this question


vaf

Question

Does the statute on inferred claims (5.8.2) apply just to claims for increase of ratings for disabilities? Or, does it also apply to claims that were previously denied, but then new and material evidence became available through a VA C & P exam for another psych condition (organic mental syndrome, a physical disability) that also indicated PTSD?

The GAF was 55, and the examiner gave the veteran copies of literature dealing with coping with PTSD. Yet, the examiner did not formally diagnose PTSD because the exam was not ordered to evaluate PTSD?

thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

That happens a lot. The problem here is although the examiner did find PTSD he was not told to look for it.

Sometimes they can really make you wonder how they got their jobs in first place.

The C&P Docs are not supposed to talk to Veterans about anything except what the VARO asked them to look for and even than if they find something they are not allowed to prescribe meds or treat.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA is sort of like the old way to train a puppy not to crap on the rug. You put the dog's nose in it. That is what you have to do with the VA. The VA has never inferred any sort of problem or claim during my C&P exams except a personality disorder they tried to use to deny compensation later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

........and, now you know how the VA handles "inferred" claims.

I mean, lookit, take MY initial claim. I had the NAVY's x-rays showing my service-incurred injury......and the Balboa Navy Hospital records. I had the Social Security Administration's medical report and notice of award for SSA, for the very same thing I had claimed, I had not one, but two ortho doc's "at least as likely as" medical opinions, I had 4, FOUR, buddy statements.................................and it only took the VA FIVE YEARS before they got me scheduled for my C&P (the C&P doctor took a look at my x-rays, asked why I was there, asked me to walk across the room and back, and made this statement in my C&P report "this veteran's disability is due totally to his injury in service................"

Now, do you think that this same outfit, this VA organization, is going to INFERR anything that is going to wind up costing them a claim?

next question?

Edited by LarryJ

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, let me rephrase this...

I know the VA doesn't really infer claims... What I want to do is throw the BS flag on the situation and tell them that I know that they know they should have done so, but didn't.

The gist of the question has to do with whether I can do it for a re-opened claim previously denied. Or, is this statute just for increases in disabilities already service connected.

I'm looking at the statute, and understand that an inferred claim is an informal claim, and that the VA must, at least on paper, "adjudicate all issues reasonably raised in all documents or oral testimony submitted prior to final agency decision."

There are Court cases cited in the VBM (page 362 for those of you who have the 2009 edition) that state "the VA is expected to carefully review all documents and testimony in a liberal manner to identify and adjudicate all reasonably raised claims."

Again, just for claims to increase disability rating levels, or also claims to re-open previously denied claims?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

VAF

There is no doubt in my mind that the VA will "look the other way" rather than addressing an inferred claim, and you wont get your benefits. Knowing this, this is what I suggest.

Send a 21-4138 form and ask them the "status" of your claim made on .......date (the date you think the claim was inferred). (Of course, keep a copy...you know, certified mail return receipt requested.) They probably wont respond, or, if they do respond, it will be something like a denial to the effect there was no such claim on such and such a date. Persist...there idea is to get you to give up...dont.

Ultimately what will happen, me thinks, is, assuming you have evidence for your claim, you will win it, but at a later date. Then appeal for an EED, based upon your inferred claim of......date.

The RO, will deny you, and you will have to appeal.

The VA fights you tooth and nail for every nickel. I think you will have a good chance at an EED upon appeal. JMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use