Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

New Va Rule: Physicians No Longer Need To Co-Sign C&p Exams

Rate this question


pacmanx1

Question

  • Moderator

NEW VA RULE: PHYSICIANS NO LONGER NEED TO CO-SIGN C&P EXAMS

NEW VA RULE: PHYSICIANS NO LONGER NEED TO CO-SIGN C&P EXAMS A physician's co-signature is no longer required for a C&P examination performed by a mid-level practitioner. This should expedite the claims process.

by Larry Scott, VA Watchdog dot Org

I am not sure if this is good or bad.

It certainly could speed up the claims process.

However, I already hear complaints from many veterans that they don't want mid-level practitioners, such as a NP or PA, doing their C&P exam ... they want a doctor.

Now, in many cases, doctors are being taken completely out of the loop.

VBA's Fast Letter 10-32 is posted below.

-------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Veterans Benefits Administration

Washington, D.C. 20420

September 1, 2010

Director (00/21)

All VA Regional Offices and Centers

In Reply Refer to: 211

Fast Letter 10-32

SUBJ: Removal of Certain Co-Signature Requirements and Ordering Specialist Examinations

Purpose

A joint workgroup of the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) and the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) identified several initiatives to expedite compensation and pension (C&P) examinations. This fast letter implements one of these initiatives by liberalizing signature requirements for VHA clinicians performing C&P examinations.

Examination Report Signature Requirements

Effective immediately, regional office and center staff may accept examination reports signed by a nurse practitioner or physician's assistant that are not co-signed by a physician. This change in signature requirements does not apply to examinations conducted by specialists, such as mental health, dental, audiology and optometry.

The M21-1 Manual Rewrite (MR) requires that a physician signs all original examination reports (see M21-1MR Part III, Subpart iv, Chapter 3, Section D, Topic 18, Block a, or

M21-1MR III.iv.3.D.18.a). Law does not mandate this policy, and it can unduly delay processing C&P examinations. In VHA, an individual physician accepts legal responsibility for the unsigned work of a mid-level practitioner, such as a nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. As a result, a physician's co-signature is no longer required for a C&P examination performed by a mid-level practitioner.

We will update the MR to reflect this change.

Specialist Versus Specialty Examinations

Please note that a specialist is only required in limited situations such as dental, vision, hearing, and psychiatric examinations, as indicated by

M21-1MR III.iv.3.A.8. For all other types of examinations, a generalist clinician may perform the examination. For example, an office may order a cardiac examination, but it should not generally request that a cardiologist (a specialist) conduct it.

Questions

E-mail questions concerning this letter to VAVBAWAS/CO/21Q&A.

/S/

Thomas J. Murphy

Director

Compensation and Pension Service

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Now you can expect your cardiac or brain tumor to be examined by a PA who does not know his/her ass from a hole in the ground. Thus the VA is prostituting good exams to save money and speed up denial process. What pigs! Congress sits by and the VSO's cheer them on! Disgusting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

This is real good. This bears the eqauivalent of urinating on a forest fire.

Beating around the bush on issues like this is really going to help.

The C And P exams are not the problem. It is the system as a whole. It needs to be did away with and re-invented.

Until that is done, Wheels will continue to spin. Wow the VA has discovered fusuion technology. A never ending process.

They need to implement continuous improvement goals , not band aides.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

As broken down as some of us are we veterans really need to take things in hand somehow. Nobody is going to do it for us. Trading information here at Hadit is really great. There are 22 million vets and yet we have to stand still for this crap?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think it will open the VA to even more appeals. I had a PA do my cardiac C&P. A cardiologist who never read it signed off on it. It was a joke. No testing at all. The PA just guessed at various things such as METS. I appealed and got stress tests. I went from a 0% rating based on the dumb PA's exam to 60% on appeal. You know that insurance companies use PA's and nurses to do disability exams and they overturn exams done by cardiologists. Maybe the VA is trying for this ability. Now PA's and NP will do all the exams. The VA will have PA's doing neurology exams. They will just smack you on the head and ask if you feel it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

I had a C and P for peripheral neuropathy three weeks ago and the end result (according to her) was that there was not enough clinical evidence to support the PA making an opinon for that or ED. She had my C file and brought the highlights and my own doctors notes with me to the C and P.

Yippee. i love PA's. I have a nexus letter for ED because of my DDD....but apparently no clinical evidence. Awesome.

Edited by brokensoldier244th

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use