Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

No C%p Exam

Rate this question


rotorhead

Question

I have been reading over the denial for I U that I received last week. The bottom line for the denial was that I am only rated at 60%.

DMII 20#

PN RU 10% UL 10% LL 10% LR 10%

Macular Degeneration 10%

TOTAL 60%

The denial states that I reported for a examination, I DID NOT have a C&P for IU. CUE?

or give it up until I am rated 70%. I am a 3 mets or less IHD claim pending back to Jan 06.

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

You should be getting an award letter soon for your IHD. Stay on top of that and hold off on appealing the IU. You may get the numbers you need from the IU + you should see a real good retro if you had claimed before and been denied.

If you appeal the IU it now it may slow down everything!

Good Luck on your claim!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been reading over the denial for I U that I received last week. The bottom line for the denial was that I am only rated at 60%.

DMII 20#

PN RU 10% UL 10% LL 10% LR 10%

Macular Degeneration 10%

TOTAL 60%

The denial states that I reported for a examination, I DID NOT have a C&P for IU. CUE?

or give it up until I am rated 70%. I am a 3 mets or less IHD claim pending back to Jan 06.

Dave

rotor,

I do not believe nor have I ever seen a specific exam for IU that exists.

Your options that I know of is to request 4.16 (b) or get some increase that would total the 70 percent for IU.

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Individual unelployability if often misconcieved as being a rateable disability. it is not. A C and P exam would be performed on your medical conditions to see of you qualify for IU which is a benefit afforded to those whose service connected disabilities are severe enough to prevent them from working.

There is no exam for IU. just an exam of service connected conditions. This is why we see so many requests for reduction as the Examiner feels conditions are improved. Sometimes IU can backfire on a Vet.

J

Edited by jbasser

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

It sure sounds like a potential "CUE" and "NOD" to me!

If no statement was made regarding IHD, you will need to at least file an NOD to protect your claim origination date before any expiration date that exists.

There is a serious question that arises if the VA claims you reported for a C%P that never happened. I'd ask immediately for a copy of the C&P.

It may be that the VA did a C&P paper record review instead of an actual exam, (they can do this), and the RO didn't notice the difference. (nothing new)

If the written evidence is good enough, this is certainly less hassle than going through an exam.

As I understand it "deemed denied" is likely the current rule for the unmentioned conditions, and might be stretched to include IHD if there isn't a "deferred" statement in the decision.

They rated the PN differently than the VARO I deal with recently did. It looks like they rated the upper and lower part of each leg in your decision separately.

The Atlanta VARO rated each leg (total) at 10% plus "Bi-Lateral" in a recent PN decision that I'm referring to.

Actually, if you are at 3 Mets or less, along with the other problems, you should be automatically considered for TDIU. The VA often fails to do this.

I have been reading over the denial for I U that I received last week. The bottom line for the denial was that I am only rated at 60%.

DMII 20#

PN RU 10% UL 10% LL 10% LR 10%

Macular Degeneration 10%

TOTAL 60%

The denial states that I reported for a examination, I DID NOT have a C&P for IU. CUE?

or give it up until I am rated 70%. I am a 3 mets or less IHD claim pending back to Jan 06.

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You can only file a CUE on a final decision. If you can still use regular appeal system then use it. File your NOD and note the fact you did not have a C&P exam. CUE is your last resort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use