Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Does Va Pay Retroactive To Disability Date?

Rate this question


gemsurf

Question

If tried many different searchs here and on the Board of Veteran Appeals search site but haven't been able to find a situation similar to mine. I have been 10% disabled since I left the Army in 1975 for residuals of a left knee injury. I applied because of pain and a permenant limp that was all documented in the original file. Fast forward to the 1990s and I develop low back and hip pain and begin being treated at the Boise VAMC. Eventually diagnosed with spinal stenosis, DDD, and DJD in both hips. I have 5 doctor entries in my records stating or strongly insinuating that these conditions are caused by my Antalgic Gait (Limp) caused by my left knee. I had no idea VA would consider these conditions secondary to my knee until my knee worsened and I began research to apply for an increase from the original 10% and stumbled into secondary disability references. I have been extremely disabled since Oct 2000, and unemployed since 2003 directly because of my back and hip problems and my VA medical records show the timeline and conditions and their severity in complete detail. I have little doubt that I will be rated enough to atleast qualify for Individual Unemployability from my file date, but I am preparing everything as strongly as I can just in case. I do have a C&P exam monday thru QTC.

My question is, if they find I am in fact disabled, and that it had it's start in 2000 or 2003, will the payments be retroactive to those dates or am I just out of luck for being ignorant? My records have 2 absolute nexus opinions and 3 others that infer they were caused by my limp dating back to Oct of 2000.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

if you have not asked for these medical conditions to be SC then they will be ignored until you file a claim for them as secondary conditions the magic fairy will not apply intent they go with what is in writing if you have not yet filed for the secondary conditions then you need to do so ASAP they can infer that you were asking for all compensable conditions to be rated but they usually don't do it

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The original date you put your claim in. Not whenever you received an injury...they are not mind readers, and could care less when it occurred. So the original date you put your claim in for your disabling condition is the date they use if there is a granting/award. Not another date you would like. Sorry, but that's the way it goes!!

When they read you file, THEY ACT ON ONLY THOSE YOU PUT IN FOR, not what else they may have found along their search.

Edited by halos2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I'm going to disagree w/halos2 and testvet. There is a slight chance they could pay retro but it'll take a long time and much argument . . . and this is just my opinion. Since you were already SC and rated 10% any treatment by the VA should have been treated as an increased claim request. I think you'd win, in the end, but it'll be a fight. Then again, I could be wrong.

pr

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for the comments. I have asked for the ratings to be retroactive to Oct 2000, but realize there is little chance of that happening. Once I get my ratings I might file an appeal and give it a run anyway. I have plenty of time to wrestle with them and from what I read in these boards, they deserve to get the butt whoomped whenever possible!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

The regulations state that the Va has to assume the Veteran is seeking ALL the benefits to which he is entitled, that is the max benefit.

Instead, the Va usaully assumes the Vet is seeking the minimum, and often gets away with it. In other words, if you applied for benefits from a back injury, but were also being treated at the VA for depression, the Va is going to assume you dont want to apply for depression, and "overlook" it on purpose.

Then if you are awarded benefits for depression, the Va is going to try to hood wink you on the effective date. However, remember the Veteran can apply for benefits, informally, at the VA docs office.

Sometimes the VA squiggles and squirms and says that you have to "identify the benefit sought."

The following is from a BVA case and may apply"

A "claim" is defined in VA regulations as "a formal or informal communication in writing requesting a determination of entitlement, or evidencing a belief in entitlement, to a benefit." 38 C.F.R. § 3.1(p) (2008). An informal claim is "[a]ny communication or action indicating an intent to apply for one or more benefits." It must "identify the benefit sought." 38 C.F.R. § 3.155(a) (2008). VA must look to all communications from a claimant that may be interpreted as applications or claims for benefits, whether formal or informal, and is required to identify and act on informal claims for benefits. Servello v. Derwinski, 3 Vet. App. 196, 198 (1992); see also Hodge v. West, 155 F.3d 1356, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (holding that VA must fully and sympathetically develop a Veteran's claim to its optimum); Roberson v. West, 251 F.3d 1378, 1384 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (holding that VA must "determine all potential claims raised by the evidence"). Furthermore, if VA fails to forward an application form to the claimant after receipt of an informal claim, then the date of the informal claim must be accepted as the date of claim for purposes of determining an effective date. Servello, 3 Vet. App. at 200. Once the date of claim is established, the Board must determine, based upon the evidence of record, the date that entitlement to the benefit arose, to include, if possible, the date upon which an increase in disability actually occurred. 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.155, 3.400(o)(2) (2008).An exception to that rule applies, however, under circumstances where evidence demonstrates that a factually ascertainable increase in disability occurred within the one-year period preceding the date of receipt of a claim for increased compensation. In that regard, the law provides that the effective date of the award "shall be the earliest date as of which it is ascertainable that an increase in disability had occurred, if application is received within one year from such date, otherwise the date of receipt of the claim." 38 U.S.C.A. § 5110 (b)(2) (West 2002); see also 38 C.F.R. § 3.400(o)(2) (2008).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks BroncoVet (Is that Denver or Boise State?) I have an entry in my med records from 2004 after I asked a VA doctor about disability that reads-

"

Pt needs to apply for disability -- needs basic

disability exam and has no insurance to get on outside- talked w/ Chreyl VSO

who told him that C&P was only for VA purposes.

"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use