Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

100% But Not P&t

Rate this question


hoagie

Question

I was just awarded 100% for PTSD, but they are going to schedule an exam in 5 years.

I don't believe that I will ever return to work (I am 56 ) and have not had any real improvement since the onset of it 3 years ago. I also receive SSDI for this condition.

Should I appeal this or is there a chance I could get a lesser rating? Also, does anyone know what the statistics are as far as how many in my situation lose their rating on a follow-up exam (or is the exam just a formality?).

Need some guidance here.....Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I had your same concerns, I am 61 and have not worked since 99. I am rated at 50 % and had a 3 yr review. Jim Strickland a respected advocate, would reccomend you stand pat. I stood pat after I appealed the 50 %. After the appeal, and the 2nd interviewer flat out lied, He only aske d me 1 question after lecturing me for 45 minutess on a totallly unrelated topic. He never asked 1 question about ptsd until the last 1 minute. I said Im mad as hell and you are a f......ass......

He said we were done and my rating was retained. The report he wrote was a total fabrication, I appealed and was denied.

My 2 cents says count your blessing, find a good psychiatrist, and pray they are honest with you.

I feel for you brother i really do. Don't turn this stone over, there is a very bad scorpion underneath. Ant additional review can reduce your award as well as increase it.

No I am nobody, don't know beans but I just gave you my pound cake, get my drift......

Ron Prince

Opinion is worth 2 cents from me....add it to your award.......

Thanks....your point is well taken. However, I find it hard to believe that they can go against their own directives (i.e Title 38). Title 38 is not a suggestion...it is the law! Tell me what I am missing here, I just can't believe that they are not challenged on this!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you appeal and win the denial of P&T the effective date will be the date of the decision to deny. I appealed when my P&T was denied. Get the medical evidence that you are permanently disabled. We both know that anyone over 55 who is 100% disabled will never return to work. Who would hire you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

John have you looked at the age of the Wal Mart door greeters? None of them are under 60 here where I live but then again it's probably the only job in town that does hire old people and they can't hire all of us I had my 7 year review from SSD this summer and I am safe until I turn 62 now I just want to live that long rofl since I won't let the VA docs put that heart defib implant in they said there is no reason for me to return to the cardiac clinic ok saves me 2 trips a year to the VA my PC doc still can write the meds I need if I need help in case of a heart attack I will have the ambulance to the nearest ER and worry about fighting the VA after they stabilize me about paying the bills but there are NO jobs for older people most companies don't like hiring mid 40 year olds let alone 50 somethings and we all know there are not enough security jobs that let you sit and watch monitors for 8 hours and some of us can't sit for 8 hours let alone stand for 8 hours with my bad back I am always moving up and down I hurt after 15 - 30 minutes in one place

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hoagie,

This is what I suggested for you to see if your doctor's will put in writing for you.

" i) When the disability is established as static;"

Both the psychiatrist and psychologist agree that my situation is basically static and I got letters from them. I forwarded a letter (along with their letters) to my VSO at the RO stating that due to an error the VA should reconsider. I also quoted the title 38 "reexamination" paragraph (3.327) which says that no reexam should be scheduled "In cases of veterans over 55 years of age, except under unusual circumstances". Believe it or not, they acted like that was the first time they had seen that article! Anyway, my VSO talked to one of his friends who is a DRO and they say that the VA will probably do what they called a "reconsideration" and have it changed within about a month. We'll see!!! (and only then will I believe)

Navydoc....yes the VA did consider my SSD information. At least it is mentioned in the decision letter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use