Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Statement In Support Of Claim

Rate this question


HvyGns38

Question

This is my statement in support of claim that I am sending to the VA along with the letter from my Dr. stating that "After careful review of Mr. XXXXXX service treatment records, it appears that Mr. XXXXX has long standing Meniere's disease that in all likelihood began while he was in the military in the early 1990's."

What does everyone think? Do I have most of my bases covered? Remember from my previous posts, the VA denied me on the grounds of no current medical diagnosis.

Thanks for your time!!!!

This statement, in support of claim is made as a follow up to my Notice of Disagreement that was received by VARO Roanoke on November 8th 2010.

On April 13, 2010 I received a decision letter denying my claim for Meniere's Disease. The VA is in custody of my service medical records which show repeated instances of care for my right ear hearing loss while in the military. During my military service in the early 1990's, I had periodic episodes of vertigo along with the hearing loss and tinnitus. On August 3, 1995 an attending physician noted symptoms consistent with right ear eustachian tube dysfunction and it was likewise noted during my separation exam on July 31, 1995. It is imperative to note, however, that these were brief exams with only hearing tests and a brief look inside the ear canal. These test were not thorough enough to detect Meniere's disease.

In 1997, after the vertigo episodes had gotten so frequent and severe, I underwent exploratory right ear surgery. Initially, the attending doctor made a pre-surgical diagnosis of perilymph fistula. The pre-surgical diagnosis of perilymph fistula which upon further research was negative. Following the surgery I was diagnosed with Meniere's disease by the Otolaryngology surgeon. The attending Doctor explained to me that there was no cure for this disease and it was something I would have to live with for the rest of my life.

In a VA decision letter received on July 28, 2009 for right ear hearing loss, it was noted by the VA examiner that "It is at least likely as not that the veteran's hearing loss and tinnitus are related to noise exposure as a Rifleman and Infantry Unit Leader and Meniere's Disease during his military service." In the decision process, this may have been overlooked.

At the present time my vertigo has become serious enough that it is causing me to miss a substantial amount of work. Because of this, I started seeing a new Otolaryngologist who has also diagnosed me with Meniere's disease. He performed an MRI to check for any acoustical tumors, which was negative. Please see attached doctor notes.

I have requested a De Novo review, a review by a Decision Review Officer at the Regional Office level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

This is my statement in support of claim that I am sending to the VA along with the letter from my Dr. stating that

"After careful review of Mr. XXXXXX service treatment records, it appears that Mr. XXXXX has long standing Meniere's disease that in all likelihood began while he was in the military in the early 1990's."

Hvy,

What is the exact pedigree of this doctor ?

It would have been in your best interest if this doctor related to anything found while they reviewed your

STR's that related to Meniere's or an ENT problem, such as:

In review of the veterans STR's, evidence of XXX dated XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX, show diagnosis / treatment for XXX.

It is my medical opinion that the current diagnosis of Meniere's is directly related to the STR evidence shown above.

In my opinion, the part that says "that in all likelihood" is not sufficient especially if it is not supported

with full medical rationale.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hvy,

What is the exact pedigree of this doctor ?

It would have been in your best interest if this doctor related to anything found while they reviewed your

STR's that related to Meniere's or an ENT problem, such as:

In review of the veterans STR's, evidence of XXX dated XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX, show diagnosis / treatment for XXX.

It is my medical opinion that the current diagnosis of Meniere's is directly related to the STR evidence shown above.

In my opinion, the part that says "that in all likelihood" is not sufficient especially if it is not supported

with full medical rationale.

Hi Carlie,

The Dr. is an Otolaryngologist. The letter from the Dr. goes into more detail, i just did not want to post it all here. The letter basically goes into an MRI to rule out a tumor, vertigo, hearing loss and tinnitus etc during his multiple exams.

He did give dates, but they were not in the same paragraph as the "review" of my SMR's.

Thanks for the reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I agree with Carlie that the statement "In all likelihood" may be viewed by the VA as speculation. They have their special language they like to use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Carlie,

The Dr. is an Otolaryngologist. The letter from the Dr. goes into more detail, i just did not want to post it all here. The letter basically goes into an MRI to rule out a tumor, vertigo, hearing loss and tinnitus etc during his multiple exams.

He did give dates, but they were not in the same paragraph as the "review" of my SMR's.

Hvy,

Otolaryngologist = ENT so they have the right pedigree.

If you want opinions it's important to always post, all the details.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think if the VA C&P doctor stated in his exam that you had Menieres disease in service you should be good to go. It may verywell be that the rater was working a claim for "hearing loss".

You could have a US army issues forceps in your chest from a botched military operation that they discover during a C&P, but if they were working a claim for flat feet they won't tell you about the forceps, they won't consider getting them out of you and they certainly wouldn't rate you for the damage they had done. I would venture to say they would accuse you of going to a military surplus store, buying a surplus instrument and having a buddy cut you open and stick them in there.

I am currently fighting them on Urinary frequency issue. I have 7 disks playing freeze tag with my spinal cord, cardiomegaly, hypertension and I am on high doses of diuretics...but the VA says my increased urinary frequency is not a result of any of my service connected disablilities or treatment for those disabilities. I AM ON A FREAKING DIURETIC they are prescribing......but it is not realted to my medical treatment. Only the VA could give you a pill to make you piss all the time then say they didn't cause it or it isn't a result of your condition.

Good luck Guns I know you will eventually prevail with the additional doctors statement. I would see if you could get the doc to say "Has Menieres disease ....and more likely that not he had it while on active duty in 19XX".

Best regards,

Tyler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hvy,

Otolaryngologist = ENT so they have the right pedigree.

If you want opinions it's important to always post, all the details.

Carlie,

Good point. I posted kind of fast and was not thinking about the details and just assumed.

John,

I understand the VA language, but that is what the Dr. wrote. He reviewed my SMR and came to the conlusion that in all "likelihood" it began in the military. Hopefully, the VA will give me the benefit of the doubt. :lol:

So, I guess I should assume that this may not get very far with the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use