Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

When "entitlement Arose"

Rate this question


Berta

Question

I finally found something that seems to clarify the VA concept of when ' entitlement arose'-as it relates to the earliest effective date.

The only thing I really had was a posthumous award letter giving my husband one year additional EED for his 100% P & T sc PTSD .VA used s SSA award date to determine his 'entitlement arose' one year prior to his claim for TDIU.

"Except as otherwise provided, the effective date of an

evaluation and award of compensation based on an original

claim, a claim reopened after final disallowance, or a claim

for increase will be the date of receipt of the claim or the

date entitlement arose, whichever is the later. 38 U.S.C.A.

§ 5110; 38 C.F.R. § 3.400.

An exception to this rule provides that the effective date of

an award for increased disability compensation shall be the

earliest date as of which it is factually ascertainable that

an increase in disability has occurred, if the claim is

received within one year from such date; otherwise, it is the

date of receipt of the claim. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5110(b)(2);

38 C.F.R. § 3.400(o)(2). When considering the appropriate

effective date for an increased rating, VA must consider the

evidence of disability during the period one year prior to

the application. See Hazan v. Gober, 10 Vet. App. 511

(1997)."

http://www4.va.gov/vetapp07/files2/0718055.txt

and referenced within:

http://en.wordpress.com/tag/801-fed-cir-2002-hazan-v-gober/

The 2002 reference to Hazan indicates this reg is still current VA case law as far as I know.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Knock it off folks and focus on the issue.

If the VA determines and determination I mean my medical evidence that a condition has worsened and you file a claim within 1 year for increase than the effective date will be th e date of the exam or test that proved you deserved an increase. Thus the date entitlement arose. SSDI is not an inferred issue, SSDI looks at the tortal disability picture. The VA only looks at Service connected conditions.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The Veteran's Benefits Manuel does address the issue of inferred claims for TDIU. SSA and VA are different but being on SSD is good evidence that you are unemployable for VA purpose if the SSD is for SC condition and the VA knows it. I would say that Old Joe does have a shot at an EED if the VA knew he was on SSD for SC condition. Joe is going to have to fight for it. There are probably thousands of vets who were on SSD for years before claiming TDIU. That is why the VA does not infer TDIU claims for them because of potential cost. If the VA knows you are unable to work for a SC condition they should infer a claim for TDIU. This is according to the VBM. The VBM says if the VA has good reason to suspect you are unemployable for SC condition they should infer TDIU. The only way to find out is to claim an EED based on your SSD status and VA records. I wish we had a lawyer here who had worked on one of these EED claims. I am interpreting the VBM according to the way I read it, so I am not an authority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

There is no relationship between SSDI and the VA except for the VA using SSA records to determine death as well as DIC claims for ths same purpose.

To say the VA has to adhere to SSDI decisions is a pipe dream. There was a bill introduced in the last congress that would have leveled theplaying field for this issue but it was in committe during the last GE and is now dead. I hope someday that is passed for the sake of all disabled vets.

J

Edited by jbasser

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

i didnt get but 20% until they accepted SSDI decision as evidence than everything I FILE was approve 100% no exam from 20%

But thats your beliefs and thats a pipe dream because .Iknow it happen to me I'm done Oldjoe!!

OldJoe, Go to the Social Security Office and request in writing that Social Security send a copy of your medical records to V.A. in support of your pending claim for TDIU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I finally found something that seems to clarify the VA concept of when ' entitlement arose'-as it relates to the earliest effective date.

The only thing I really had was a posthumous award letter giving my husband one year additional EED for his 100% P & T sc PTSD .VA used s SSA award date to determine his 'entitlement arose' one year prior to his claim for TDIU.

"Except as otherwise provided, the effective date of an

evaluation and award of compensation based on an original

claim, a claim reopened after final disallowance, or a claim

for increase will be the date of receipt of the claim or the

date entitlement arose, whichever is the later. 38 U.S.C.A.

§ 5110; 38 C.F.R. § 3.400.

An exception to this rule provides that the effective date of

an award for increased disability compensation shall be the

earliest date as of which it is factually ascertainable that

an increase in disability has occurred, if the claim is

received within one year from such date; otherwise, it is the

date of receipt of the claim. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5110(b)(2);

38 C.F.R. § 3.400(o)(2). When considering the appropriate

effective date for an increased rating, VA must consider the

evidence of disability during the period one year prior to

the application. See Hazan v. Gober, 10 Vet. App. 511

(1997)."

http://www4.va.gov/vetapp07/files2/0718055.txt

and referenced within:

http://en.wordpress.com/tag/801-fed-cir-2002-hazan-v-gober/

The 2002 reference to Hazan indicates this reg is still current VA case law as far as I know.

I am sure your death claim was helped by a regulation at 38 CFR 3.153 on receipt of evidence by Social Security and V.A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Just because you get SSDI does not mean you are eligible for TDIU because TDIU is for service connected conditions only, and SSDI just means you are disabled for any reason.

In the past if you read your SSDI decision, and if it states you are disabled due to conditions for which you are service connected, then the VA is going to have to look at that.

Basically what we think means pretty much nothing anyway. It sounds like you are going to have to convince a BVA judge that you are entilted to an EED.

I suggest you start reading CAVC cases, especially "panel" or "en banc" decisions, which set a precedent, trying to find one most like yours. Then, when you appeal, if you are appealing pro se, then cite those decisions in your "arguement" for an EED.

I also recommend you read up on Informal Claims and Inferred Claims, and how they can establish the effective date. I do not recall reading anything about SSDI being regarded as an informal claim. Remember your effective date is the later of the facts found or claim date. If you read about that year earlier thing, you will see that only applies in special circumstances.

When you are dealing with the VA, it is not about what I think, or what you think. Its about what the judge says, and he is gonna "say" pretty much what another judge said, in a similar circumstance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use