Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Are They Tipping There Hand?

Rate this question


dittybopper

Question

Hello All,

Some time ago I appealed a decision on my knees as I thought they got the rating wrong. After that I submitted a claim secondary to my knee pain of anxiety,stress as well as PTSD. This diagnosis is supported by my Doctor but the VA called it adjustment disorder during the C and P. My VA psyciatrist as well as my team councellor are calling it severe depression. So basically my appeal got placed on a back burner until they handled the new claim. Last Friday I recieved a letter asking me if I still wanted a video interview for my appeal. My Depression etc... has been at the rating board since Mar 3. Is it likely they made a decision on my claim and are now turning to my appeal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Maybe and maybe not. I don't think you can go there with just that information. The VA is a black box when it comes to how they do these things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The appeal has nothing to do with the pending claim. They are two seperate issues. Reply to the question concerning your appeal.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

John...

You got that right! The VA is a black box with a string in it and you dont know when or if the string will come out.

You have to remember the VA is a very large organazation with many people with widely different view points about Veterans and other issues. People always want to know "what the VA will do"...this is kinda like trying to predict which frog will jump the highest in a frog jumping contest.

For each claim there is one decision maker who has the srtiped shirts and "calls the play". Yes, some of the calls are not just controversial..they are just plain wrong. But the one with the striped shirts is always with the VA. And,

as the VA calls it, "the VA is an interested party" in your decision.

The results are mixed. Many, many Vets who deserve benefits are denied..but then are faced with a choice of whether or not they want to fight the VA for five years or try something else. There are also a few who may get some benefits they dont deserve...and I dont begrudge those Vets one bit. After all..who should the money go to?

VA executive bonuses.? Government Contractors.? More concrete memorials to Vets?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John...

You got that right! The VA is a black box with a string in it and you dont know when or if the string will come out.

You have to remember the VA is a very large organazation with many people with widely different view points about Veterans and other issues. People always want to know "what the VA will do"...this is kinda like trying to predict which frog will jump the highest in a frog jumping contest.

For each claim there is one decision maker who has the srtiped shirts and "calls the play". Yes, some of the calls are not just controversial..they are just plain wrong. But the one with the striped shirts is always with the VA. And,

as the VA calls it, "the VA is an interested party" in your decision.

The results are mixed. Many, many Vets who deserve benefits are denied..but then are faced with a choice of whether or not they want to fight the VA for five years or try something else. There are also a few who may get some benefits they dont deserve...and I dont begrudge those Vets one bit. After all..who should the money go to?

VA executive bonuses.? Government Contractors.? More concrete memorials to Vets?

Broncovet, I'm shocked... how could you write such a disgusting post? Gee, the VA is our friend... they are there to help us!! Ok, I think I have to change my depends now.....lmao

You forgot to mention the shrimp dip, the politicians can use at their State dinners!! They have to save money somewhere so that they can have respectable socials!! Why not off the back of the Veteran? Did we not give them a blank check when we enlisted/were drafted?

Old soldiers never die.... we just fight new wars!

Proud to have served, U.S. Army WAC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use