Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Social Worker

Rate this question


RonP

Question

The VA has now assigned me a social worker, after my last visit to my Clinic Psychiatrist.

Does any one have any idea as to why this is relevant.

I am currently 50% Ptsd. But they say they are trying to get me an increase.

This is a Nemyer case and the file is open on someones desk in San Diego

I live in the Philippines.

Thanks,

Ron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

You have to call them and the VA will tell you who your SW'er is. Mine helped me get some home care. I was disappointed with the care. They tried to charge my medicare first. Then I told them I am 100% HB vet so get it right.

The VA oursourced my home care to some private outfit that was just awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for this info - I had no idea there was such a person. Maybe they can help me to get a voucher so I can get my IBS tests locally...

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks as always for your comments.

The Cardiologist actually quoted a US GOVERNMENT STUDY in his letter to the VA .

At that time they would not allow a claim for Heart Disease of any kind , we were told.

Since I was referred by the Psychiatric unit of Kaiser, my medical provider, they said I had to file for PTSD

A 10 minute conversation at the VA Cafeteria. I never had an actual PTSD test or evaluation of any kind.

Until I came to the Philippines, and then it was by a hired gun Psychologist, that never asked 1 question

about my combat history at the age of 17 and 18. Denied the request for increase.I appealed the decision to increase, but was denied on appeal.

Since all this Nemyer stuff started, the VA has been nicer to me, assigned me an actual experienced shrink that is also an MD,

and she has changed my diagnosis. I went in for my normal 6 month visit to VA and I had trouble getting to the desk when they called me.

They called for a couple of nurses to help me to his office, it was then that he , the one that thinks combat is a video game, brought in the

case worker, It was like I won a prize or something. She actually called to see if I was ok after the return flight home......It just smells fishy to me. The VA is all of a sudden being nice.....

Pardon my cynicism, but something stinks in the corner. They have now assigned me back to the Shrink that does know something about combat for 3 more months.

Anyway, it just smells to me......MY ejection fraction is so low that my entire lower extremities go to sleep if I sit in one position for more than a half hour or so.

Try to walk on 2 dead feet and you look kind of comical. Like a Palsy thing......LOL

You might have hit it on the head, Neymer is forcing them to re-evaluate initial diagnosis, and are choking on the possible retro involved.

Thanks,

Ron Prince

I went back to your older Posts Ron

"my Dr wrote a letter about PTSD more likely than not caused my Ischemic Heart Disease"

I too had a claim like that in 1995 that was denied.But no IMO.

I think- since you are under Nehmer- the VA is trying to determine the older claim as to how it has been subsumed by the newer IHD claim.

They could have found something in that older decision ( you did have an IMO) that was wrong and to your favor.

Odd because I have similiar situation.

I re -opened 2 claims my husband had pending at death and they were awarded but I also received a denial that I forgot I appealed to the BVA.I even forgot I had file Motion of CUE on the BVA decision.Which was denied.When I found te BVA denial I sent it to Nehmer people and NVLSP.

After re-=opening his claims I had read an extraordinary book written by a VA cardiologist.

He was convinced that, after he had autopsied countless incountry combat deceased veterans, the high level of atherosclerotic heart disease he found they had, at ages almost all under 25,had to be profoundly related to the stress of battle.

I filed an additional claim for my husband's PTSD causing his heart disease.I sent the VA this entire book as evidence. They got md because I swiped it from the Bath VA patient's library.I did get it back to the library with a small late fee. I had a VA library card anyhow. That claim was denied as well as a CUE motion I had filed so that put me under Nehmer .But I also filed 2 SMC CUE claims in 2004 that were also put under Nehmer in August 2010.

In this respect I think our Nehmer claims are the same-

VA told me that they must resolve the CUE claims (pending when IHD regs came out)in my case as they directly involve legal errors on IHD, before they decide the formal AO IHD claim.

So I am thinking in your case they have to look over the older claim you had regarding PTSD to heart disease to see if that claim was done properly at time of denial and then Nehmer would resolve the IHD claim if Nehmer would offer you the highest potential benefit.

OR they are attempting to rate you properly based on the older PTSD claim and medical evidence at time of that claim for a staged IHD rating under Nehmer.

Could that be possible?

Could it also be possible that they rated you wrong as NSC heart disease at time of the older claim?

Or they discovered the PTSD rating then was wrong?

"But they say they are trying to get me an increase.

This is a Nemyer case and the file is open on someones desk in San Diego

I live in the Philippines."

Then again maybe there is no relationship to the "increase" to the social worker ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just caught a vet's post at another web site-

he was awarded some time ago for DMII and recently awarded under Nehmer for IHD.

The Nehmer people told him the rest of his claim was going to another VARO.

It sounded to me like Nehmer rater caugt an error in his other claim.

"Neymer is forcing them to re-evaluate initial diagnosis, and are choking on the possible retro involved."

I agree.

The Footnote One stuff in Nehmer is interesting and provides for AO comp even if the VA failed to properly rate IHD or any one of the new presumptives in a past decision.

Even if I had not filed CUE claims in 2004, I am sure the VA's errors in older decisions I had would have been caught by the Nehmer raters as they failed to even rate my husband;s IHD in the same 1151 award letter I got in which they said their failure to diagnose and treat it had caused his death.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You know I was rated 0% for arterioscelorisis(spelling?) and on appeal I got 60% for heart disease. Do I have any claim under Nehmer. I filed in 2003 and it was rated 0% so I was not denied per se. I was not included in the Nehmer group. I don't want to rattle this cage unless I can get something because I got "S" out of the 60% rating and that rating was a benefit of doubt rating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

John:

I think that you have a claim but no one has a claim with the VA till they ask for it.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use