Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Is It Possible To Appeal A Disability Rating For A Decease Vet

Rate this question


DVCal

Question

My father passed away a few months ago and at his time of death he was rated 80% mainly due to diabetes and heart disease. My father however was unable to walk or work due to osteoarthritis of the knee. The VA rejected his claim that his osteoarthritis was serviced related. We firmly believe that his osteoarthritis was a result of his diabetes, which they have accepted as service related. The service lead to AO exposure, which lead to diabetes, which caused the osteoarthritis, which made my father unable to walk. My parents were planning to appeal before my father passed away, but now my mother thinks it is too late. If they give her the increase payment for the 4 year period that my father was rated disable, it would really help.

Question 1: Is it too late to request another review or appeal for an increase percentage and inclusion of the osteoarthritis as service related.

Question 2: If we do request they re-look at his file can they decide to LOWER his rating and demand money back?

Question: 3: If we push this can they take away the DIC that my mother was awarded?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

This is a very difficult one to win. The only connection between osteoarthritis and diabetes II is the fact that many diabetics are obese and the obesity puts the pressure on the knees.

Anything is possible, though, but I dont see the VA approving this one unless there is iron clad evidence and a strong IMO.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"My parents were planning to appeal before my father passed away, but now my mother thinks it is too late"

"The VA rejected his claim that his osteoarthritis was serviced related."

If there was a claim pending for the denial when he died or your mother is still within the appellate period there is possibility she could substitute herself as the claimant and continue the claim.

Not enough info here to know for sure-

When he died (I see she gets DIC) did she have a claim for "accrued benefits" pending as part of her DIC application?

"Question 1: Is it too late to request another review or appeal for an increase percentage and inclusion of the osteoarthritis as service related."

If By medical evidence (such as an IMO she can get the osteoporosis stated to be secondary for any AO condition he had ( possible but it will take a strong Independent Medical Opinion) it is also possible that even f there was not an accrued claim made on the DIC application, then possibly the Nehmer decision would allow a retroactive payment for the osteoporosis.

"Question 2: If we do request they re-look at his file can they decide to LOWER his rating and demand money back?"

Nope- dont worry there.

"Question: 3: If we push this can they take away the DIC that my mother was awarded?" Not a chance.

"The VA rejected his claim that his osteoarthritis was serviced related"

What was the date of that claim and was a NOD or anything else filed as appeal of the denial?

There isnt enough info here to really determine how this could play out for your mother.

Still nothing is impossible with the VA.

I was awarded last year- 16 years after my husband's death for a AO disability (DMII)he didnt even know he had (it was misdiagnosed

and the VA never rated it but might with my current AO Nehmer claim.)

So even though he never claimed the DMII, it could become part of the accrued award I expect under my pending claim-because that claim falls under Nehmer.

Also when my husband died, he had called VA the same day of his death to learn both of his pending claims were in the rating board.

When he got off the phone he again told me they would kill him ( they did FTCA, 1151 awards)

and he wanted me promise I would pursue his pending 1151 claim and his PTSD claim if he died.

I did and they were resolved about 3 years later.But this was because they were reopens in my own name within one year after his death and mentioned on the DIC application and I then formally re- opened them separately myself.

So there is possibility she might be able to re open or appeal the claim he had that was denied.But when was it denied? It might be too late.

If there is no way to find medical evidence and a strong IMO however to associate this disability with his AO disabilities, then there might be no feasible way to pursue it.

Did the VARO mention this claim in their DIC award letter?

If so can you tell us what the award letter said about it?

We have considerable info here in our DIC forum that could help her.

But this presents an unusual and potentially difficult claim for accrued benefits.

Accrued benefits claims MUST be filed within one year after a veteran's death unless they are directly AO related so any further benefit she might be able to get depends,in my opinion, solely due to very strong evidence that AO DMII caused this additional disability.

An IMO doctor (we have IMO forum here too) would have to go over all medical records and give a VERY strong medical rationale that his DMII caused the Osteoporosis.

It might help to google all SC meds he took to see if any of them can possibly cause osteoporosis as a side affect.

I did a lot of research for all of my claims and it is amazing what one can find on the internet medically.

I also suggest that your mom find a vet rep who could look over her potential here.

If the Osteoporosis was rated as a NSC disability in past ratings he had then Nehmer (Footnote one- explained here in our AO forum) could possibly kick in if the DMII is associated medically with the osteoporosis.

We just had yesterday a Footnote one Nehmer vet here who received $485,000 in retro under the Nehmer Court Order.(In our AO forum)

I am a Nehmer Footnote one widow and expect retro as well for AO conditions I did not even know my husband had when I filed for accrued benefits (and VA didnt tell him or me what he had)

Nehmer has many facets that can involve additional awards particularily for the 3 new AO presumptives.

Any vet rep should be well versed in AO and Nehmer by now to see if she should re open this claim.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is example what I meant about any side affects of his meds:

"New research raises the possibility that long-term treatment with rosiglitazone, as Avandia is also called, could lead to osteoporosis. The diabetes drug is used to improved response to insulin.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22066522/ns/health-diabetes/t/diabetes-drug-may-hike-osteoporosis-risk/"

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use