Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tdiu

Rate this question


vet2010

Question

I am awarded 100% Sc however if VA for some reason reduce my claim to say 70%, can I immediatly file for TDIU? if so how long and what are the critieriasto file?

vet2010

August 1990 - October 2010... 20 yrs, 2 months and 2 days exact....

Mathew 18:20 KJV

For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I'd like to address why you believe your rating will be reduced ...

Do you have reason to believe that the VA will propose to reduce one or more of evaluations sometime in the future? Do some of your issues on your Rating Decision have a statement similar to: ... as this condition may improve, a future examination has been ordered ?

Is there a statement somewhere on your Rating Decision or notification letter to the effect of his rating is permanent and total ? Note: despite this statement, permanence really doesn't exist until that magic 20 year point (other than amputations, LOU, etc). ref: 38 CFR 3.951(b) http://www.benefits....ART3/S3_950.DOC

FYI, the rule on reexaminations is 38 CFR 3.327 http://www.benefits....ART3/S3_327.DOC .

The rule on Revision of Decisions for compensation is at 38 CFR 3.105(e) http://www.benefits....ART3/S3_105.DOC .

The rule on Reductions and DIscontinuances (Veteran) is at 38 CFR 3.501(g)(2) http://www.benefits....ART3/S3_501.DOC

Note: I cannot provide a citation at the moment to support the following, but ... an evaluation based on a re-examination if the reexamination findings are the same as were used to assign the original rating. (yeah, I know, that was really badly written). What I'm trying to say, I guess, is that if a particular medical finding(s) was/were used to support a particular evaluation (even if over-generously), and that the same finding(s) existed on re-examination, I can't propose a reduction. (that wasn't much better, but I hope you get my drift).

I am awarded 100% Sc however if VA for some reason reduce my claim to say 70%, can I immediatly file for TDIU? if so how long and what are the critieriasto file?

vet2010

Interested

causalobserver8@aol.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am worried about two ratings that were awarded to me and you're exactly right it states " as this condition may improve, a future examination has been ordered ". I retired 31 Oct 2010 and I cannot work however I don't want VA to reduce my claim for any reason. The two I am worried about is, a) Depression, and b) Prostatis, both of these conditions have worsened since my retirment and I was never prescribed meds for either condition while on active duty. Since retireing I am now prescribed Zoloft for depression and a host of other meds for my Prostate. What should I expect, how soon and basically what do yall think?

thanks

vet2010

August 1990 - October 2010... 20 yrs, 2 months and 2 days exact....

Mathew 18:20 KJV

For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's still early in the game but, keep taking your meds, keep all appointments especially for depression and prostate treatments, and if you feel the depression has not gotten better or worse, always express that at your appointments. Even if the appointment is for a blood test, Ya never know what will get written down - when & where.

Try and relax and enjoy your retirement, you have certainly earned it. I like playing video games sometime. They are really cool now and helps keep my mind off of my chronic pain conditions and depression too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for time frame .... if the VA Regional Office with your claims file intends for you to have a re-examination, actions to schedule them usually begin about 3 1/2 - 4 years after service connection or evaluation award.

Others have made good suggestions about continuing treatment. However, AND I DO NOT RECOMMEND THIS, you may choose to do nothing. Interesting question isn't it, cure or comp?

If you do have a reexamination, make sure that the VARO knows where you've had treatments, whether at a VAMC, a Military Treatment Facility or from a civilian practitioner.

Following is some general (and brief) information about future examinations, preservation of service connection, and preservation of evaluations.

There are three time frames of importance:

1. Five years of service connection and/or award of a particular evaluation. Before the five year point, I may propose to reduce an evaluation based on only one reexamination. However, after 5 years of service connection or a particular evaluation, a disability is generally considered static and I generally must have another re-examination to propose to reduce. Note: I can even propose to sever service connection up to the 10 year point.

2. Ten years of service connection. After ten years of service connection, service connection cannot be withdrawn (subject to fraud, etc). However, I can propose a reduction based on medical evidence or reexamination.

3. Twenty years after award of a particular evaluation. After 20 years, a particular rating evaluation becomes "set", that is, if you have had a 30% for a particular disability for 20 years, the evaluation cannot be reduced lower than 30%. However, if you had that 30% rating for twenty years and get an increase to 50% at the 20 year point, the 50% would not be protected for another 20 years. However, the 30% level is protected. Simple, isn't it?

Please don't obsess. No matter what anyone says, it really is time-consuming and moderately to very difficult to reduce an evaluation and particularly to sever service connection.

I am worried about two ratings that were awarded to me and you're exactly right it states " as this condition may improve, a future examination has been ordered ". I retired 31 Oct 2010 and I cannot work however I don't want VA to reduce my claim for any reason. The two I am worried about is, a) Depression, and b) Prostatis, both of these conditions have worsened since my retirment and I was never prescribed meds for either condition while on active duty. Since retireing I am now prescribed Zoloft for depression and a host of other meds for my Prostate. What should I expect, how soon and basically what do yall think?

thanks

vet2010

Interested

causalobserver8@aol.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use