Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Lawyers Advise

Rate this question


tmoe

Question

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

this is the fee agrement.and if you dont believe me ask a lawyer your self they will tell you the same thing I dont have no reason to lie

8 years of retro for eed or cue claim I need all the lawyers I can get,just glad i have a case at least the lawyers think so.

scan0005.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

forgot this one. If anyone see anything wrong with this please let me know about agreement and whats wrong this is what i sign and talk to

other lawyers about this all say same thing 20% is max if VA deduct it from your pay. Up to 30% but you have to pay.The other part of agreement

scan0006.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Try reading this link. It says that, the VA can review attorneys fees, but a fee of 20% will "presumed to be reasonable".

It would appear that the attorney can "charge" 30%, but the Va could review it and reduce it to 20%. It sounds like the attorney would have to justify to the VA the reason this case would be more than 20%. JMHO.

http://www.vva.org/v...t_benefits.html

It includes a fast letter by Brad Mayes. Whether we like it or not, he's "da man", when it comes to Va benefits, and pretty much no one will over rule him except maybe the courts or congress.

Veterans sometimes use "Fast Letters" signed by Brad Mayes as evidence. They are the official policy of the department of Veterans Affairs.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the 2011 edition of the VBM by NVLSP, in their Appendix on pages 1626 and 1627 with a sample fee agreement-

under 38 C.F.R. 14.686 (h) ,attorneys can only charge 20% of any retro and can add additional costs for copies of medical records, but must absorb in-office copy fees, any phone4 fees generated to the claimant, any computer research the attorney does, and any mailing fees.

I would also assume (I have not read the considerable info in the VBM on attorneys and VA claims)that

in some cases if the attorney advances a cost for an IMO- that could be added to their fee but few attorneys will do that for a VA claim.

A Fee agreement ,sent to any prospective VA claimant does not indicate the attorney thinks the claim will succeed.

It just means if they help you to succeed, they will be paid from the retro.

The above 38 CFR citation is for VA,BVA, and CAVC lawyers.

I suggest anyone considering hiring a lawyer for a VA claim to ask them for the Docket and citations numbers for claims at the BVA they have won, and/or lost.

As well as at the CAVC.

If a claim has probative medical evidence, and the proofs of exposure or any other conditions the VCAA letter asks for and these conditions have been met, by the veteran's evidence -then in my opinion-they don't need a lawyer to succeed.

However there are claims that are so unusual and unique or simply denied at every point with no reasonable rationale from the VA, these are claims that might require a lawyer's help.

Be careful of what you sign.

I considered hiring a lawyer for my 2004 CUE claims.In discussions with the lawyer regarding my claims status I mentioned another claim pending since 2003 that, at that point, had n impact n my 2003 claim.

The lawyer wanted me to sign an Undated fee agreement when they found out the other claim was worth slightly less than $60,000, because it looked like that older claim would be resolved at some prior to the CUE claim.

That claim was solid because of years of work I had done on it already.

I refused to sign an undated agreement that could have potentially given them 20 % of the 60 thousand.They didn't do a single thing at all to support or advance the 2003 claim and I never asked them to represent me on that.

After I dumped them on the fee agreement thing- they called me and emailed me as they still wanted to handle my CUE claim.

They even re worded the fee agreement and dates on it.

No way Jose.

Let the buyer beware.

I think this is a good law firm and wont reveal their names but then again-they had seen my evidence for the older claim and knew it was a winner.

I didn't have to share that almost 60 thousand award with anyone.

When I filed a Mandamus Writ years ago I heard from 12 lawyers wo saw my contact info on the CAVC docket. I asked them for info on their successful VA claims.

We have every right to ask any lawyer who says they can represent us before the VA for some info on their expertise in VA case law.

And if they are fully accredited by the VA to handle veterans claims.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use