Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Got A Rating!

Rate this topic


usmcman001

Recommended Posts

I found out that I was awarded 30% PTSD. I found this out by going to ebenefits and checking my profile. I am a total of 40% now. I am happy but haven't received paper in mail yet. I am going to fight it. I fall in the 50-70% range I feel like. I had a gag of 58 but we all know that doesn't matter sometimes.

I am going to appeal this and need as much help from you guys as possible. My dav sponsor is dragging his feet with everything from calls to getting paperwork I needed. Should I get a lawyer involved or do this myself. I want to shoot for 70 as I have alot of the symptoms for this rating and some fall in 50 mark. Always gonna go for what I feel I deserve. Thanks for the info and help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

Now that the VA has established you have PTSD I would get an IMO to show that it is worse than 30% disabling. I think you have got your foot in the door which is the hardest part. Now you have to gather evidence to show your condition is severe and chronic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

file an nod. the va will order a c and p exam. the them about your worst day symptoms.i was 50% for ptsd. filed for unemployability va ordered a c and p , went straight to 100% p and t.cheif.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found out that I was awarded 30% PTSD. I found this out by going to ebenefits and checking my profile. I am a total of 40% now. I am happy but haven't received paper in mail yet. I am going to fight it. I fall in the 50-70% range I feel like. I had a gag of 58 but we all know that doesn't matter sometimes.

I am going to appeal this and need as much help from you guys as possible. My dav sponsor is dragging his feet with everything from calls to getting paperwork I needed. Should I get a lawyer involved or do this myself. I want to shoot for 70 as I have alot of the symptoms for this rating and some fall in 50 mark. Always gonna go for what I feel I deserve. Thanks for the info and help.

usmcman,

Congrats on getting it SC'd even at the 30% level, which is a much better

evaluation than getting zero or 10%.

No - you do not need a lawyer.

IMO, you don't really even need a VSO - but if you are comfortable with having a VSO

then stick with them.

You posted,

"I want to shoot for 70 as I have alot of the symptoms for this rating and some fall in 50 mark."

Personally - at this time I would NOT file a NOD (and get myself wrapped up into the appeal level),

nor would I submit a request for reconsideration on the percentage level assigned, unless there

was hard core medical evidence that completely supported a higher level, of record at the time

this decision was adjudicated - and this specific medical evidence was not listed or factored into

the percentage evaluation assigned.

If you look over the rating decision real good, it will point out specifically why the VA decision maker

felt that a 30% evaluation is warranted, versus a higher percentage level.

We all realize the VBA disability system is backlogged and the VBA process is slow.

Once you go into appeals you then realize, you really did not have a full understanding of what slow was : -)

I feel you would receive better (not a rubber stamped agreement with the 30% or quick denial for a higher percentage)

and quicker results by letting this decision become final (passing of 1 year), while this time is passing you continue with

your current therapy and speak with your MH professionals regarding how your MH disability effects your daily life,

especially in regards to Occupational and Social functioning.

If you have progress / treatment note or a written opinion from them that FULLY supports a higher level

and the one year mark has passed - you would then file a claim to request an increase in your MH evaluation.

This is only my opinion and many other's will probably post to file a NOD on the percentage evaluation now

inorder to protect your effective date.

The VBA has taught me that this is not necessarily the best way to go - for now at least.

If you were to post ALL OF AND EXACTLY what is stated in the Reasons and Bases Section,

more answers, opinions and suggestions might be posted.

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you are not working 30% is a low ball and you should ask for TDIU thus making VA take another look at your rating. If its less than a year you can roll the appeal of low rating into TDIU and or higher rating you were talking about.

Have you applied for Social Security?

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use