Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Award Letter

Rate this question


sparkle

Question

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes but you should ask SS to give you a copy of the Medical Report. Usually you can go to the office nearest you and get it.

Good Luck

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If an SSA disability award is for solely SC conditions then it is great evidence for a TDIU claim.

NSC conditions ,if part of a SSA award, become problematic for TDIU.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

A veteran I was helping was denied service connection and at the same time awarded a non service connected pension. During the process the VA was informed that he was recieving SSI for a disability. When he appealed the denial of service connection the VA held up his claim until they got the SSA records. As Pete stated, the social security medical records will show the specific qualifying disability. Keep in mind that the SSA does not always evaluate all your disabilities. Once they find a qualifying disability the might drop any further workup on other claimed disabilities. If it were me I would make sure the SSA used your service connected condition as the qualifying disability before notifying the VA of the SSDI award. This would eliminate any delays while the VA obtains SSA records. An exception to this would be a situation where the medical reports were developed enough by the SSA for the service connected condition that submitting them would be beneficial to your VA claim.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Keep in mind that the SSA does not always evaluate all your disabilities. Once they find a qualifying disability the might drop any further workup on other claimed disabilities. If it were me I would make sure the SSA used your service connected condition as the qualifying disability before notifying the VA of the SSDI award."

You are profoundly correct Hoppy.

That is why I fought SSA when they awarded for a NSC CVA, yet had ample med recs on my husband's PTSD.

Actually it wasnt a fight-= just a reconsideration request with one of SSA own regs as evidence.They changed their initial award for NSC CVA to PTSD with a far better effective date.

The CVA my husband had was determined "as if" SC due to Sec 1151 in 1998 and then 18 years after the CVA and his death they granted the CVA and his IHD as service connected due to misdiagnosed DMII last year.

I am hoping to finally get a rating on his DMII and IHD under Nehmer for accrued SMC ( VA has Never rated these conditions)

and a proper rating on his CVA.They rated it as 80% but it should have been 100%.

Even though a reconsideration request can bring about a different disability award and EED, the original award can often become probative for other VA claims.

You are right- the VA disability should be listed as the main disability for SSA purposes, if possible.

My husband's medical records for PTSD went back to 1983 with continuous care ,and his CVA

med recs showed only 2 months of hospitalized care (one month of which the VA had wasted by completely misdiagnosing the CVA.)

Yet the CVA was catastrophic so they awarded solely on that until we filed the reconsideration request for an award solely for his PTSD.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SSDI awarded but didn't state conditions would this still be great evidence for VATDIU?

It will be good if SSDI was fully favorable due to SC'd disabilities.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use