Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Help With C&p Results Regarding My Spine...

Rate this question


Quaymar

Question

I finally got a copy of my C&P exam and I am trying to interpret the results. I'm hoping to get some help understanding what I'm looking at so any and all feedback is appreciated. The ROM results are as follows;

Cervical Spine ROM

Flexion: 0 to 30 degrees.

Extension: 0 to 39 degrees.

Left Lateral Flexion: 0 to 30 degrees.

Left Lateral Rotation: 0 to 60 degrees.

Right Lateral Flexion: 0 to 30 degrees.

Right Lateral Rotation: 0 to 60 degrees.

Is there objective evidence of pain on active ROM? No.

Additional limitation with repetitive motion; Is there objective evidence of pain following repetitive motion? No. Are there additional limitations after three repetitions of range of motion? No.

Thoracolumbar Spine ROM

Flexion: 0 to 60 degrees.

Extension: 0 to 20 degrees.

Left Lateral Flexion: 0 to 20 degrees.

Left Lateral Rotation: 0 to 20 degrees.

Right Lateral Flexion: 0 to 25 degrees.

Right Lateral Rotation: 0 to 20 degrees.

Is there objective evidence of pain on active ROM? Yes.

Additional limitation with repetitive motion; Is there objective evidence of pain following repetitive motion? Yes. Are there additional limitations after three repetitions of range of motion? Yes.

What is the most important factor? Pain.

ROM After Repetitive Motion

Flexion: 0 to 55 degrees.

Extension: 0 to 25 degrees.

Left Lateral Flexion: 0 to 15 degrees.

Left Lateral Rotation: 0 to 5 degrees.

Right Lateral Flexion: 0 to 20 degrees.

Right Lateral Rotation: 0 to 5 degrees.

Time lost from work during last 12-month period: 8 weeks.

Cause: Con leave from back surgery.

I didn't type every last word, I just wrote what I think matters. If I missed something or you have a question, please ask.

The information regarding my cervical spine seems correct as I haven't had any issues with that part of my back until just recently. I'm getting epidural shots now and may need another surgery but that occurred after the C&P exam.

If I'm reading the Thoracolumbar part correct, it seems that I should get a rating of 20% based on the Flexion ROM of 55 degrees or would it be; "Unfavorable ankylosis of the entire thoracolumbar spine......50?" But, since I had spinal fusion of T7-T8, I should get 60% because I missed 8 weeks of work and the VASRD states; "With incapacitating episodes having a total duration of at least 6 weeks during the past 12 months ..... 60"

It seems quite confusing to me, I hope someone can clear things up for me...thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I finally got a copy of my C&P exam and I am trying to interpret the results. I'm hoping to get some help understanding what I'm looking at so any and all feedback is appreciated. The ROM results are as follows;

Cervical Spine ROM

Flexion: 0 to 30 degrees.

Extension: 0 to 39 degrees.

Left Lateral Flexion: 0 to 30 degrees.

Left Lateral Rotation: 0 to 60 degrees.

Right Lateral Flexion: 0 to 30 degrees.

Right Lateral Rotation: 0 to 60 degrees.

Is there objective evidence of pain on active ROM? No.

Additional limitation with repetitive motion; Is there objective evidence of pain following repetitive motion? No. Are there additional limitations after three repetitions of range of motion? No.

Thoracolumbar Spine ROM

Flexion: 0 to 60 degrees.

Extension: 0 to 20 degrees.

Left Lateral Flexion: 0 to 20 degrees.

Left Lateral Rotation: 0 to 20 degrees.

Right Lateral Flexion: 0 to 25 degrees.

Right Lateral Rotation: 0 to 20 degrees.

Is there objective evidence of pain on active ROM? Yes.

Additional limitation with repetitive motion; Is there objective evidence of pain following repetitive motion? Yes. Are there additional limitations after three repetitions of range of motion? Yes.

What is the most important factor? Pain.

ROM After Repetitive Motion

Flexion: 0 to 55 degrees.

Extension: 0 to 25 degrees.

Left Lateral Flexion: 0 to 15 degrees.

Left Lateral Rotation: 0 to 5 degrees.

Right Lateral Flexion: 0 to 20 degrees.

Right Lateral Rotation: 0 to 5 degrees.

Time lost from work during last 12-month period: 8 weeks.

Cause: Con leave from back surgery.

I didn't type every last word, I just wrote what I think matters. If I missed something or you have a question, please ask.

The information regarding my cervical spine seems correct as I haven't had any issues with that part of my back until just recently. I'm getting epidural shots now and may need another surgery but that occurred after the C&P exam.

If I'm reading the Thoracolumbar part correct, it seems that I should get a rating of 20% based on the Flexion ROM of 55 degrees or would it be; "Unfavorable ankylosis of the entire thoracolumbar spine......50?" But, since I had spinal fusion of T7-T8, I should get 60% because I missed 8 weeks of work and the VASRD states; "With incapacitating episodes having a total duration of at least 6 weeks during the past 12 months ..... 60"

It seems quite confusing to me, I hope someone can clear things up for me...thanks.

What stands out to me is the Convalescent leave for 8 weeks.... which usually calls for a temporary 100% rate for a specific period then a lower rating based on ROM. But I see no basis for a 50 or 60% rating in these notes......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"What stands out to me is the Convalescent leave for 8 weeks.... which usually calls for a temporary 100% rate for a specific period then a lower rating based on ROM. But I see no basis for a 50 or 60% rating in these notes......"

He would not get this unless he gets SC. Then he could.

James A. Bunker

Executive Director

National Gulf War Resource Center

Phone: 785-925-9887

Email: Do not post your email address.

Join us on Facebook

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"What stands out to me is the Convalescent leave for 8 weeks.... which usually calls for a temporary 100% rate for a specific period then a lower rating based on ROM. But I see no basis for a 50 or 60% rating in these notes......"

He would not get this unless he gets SC. Then he could.

Really? I thought that went without saying.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What stands out to me is the Convalescent leave for 8 weeks.... which usually calls for a temporary 100% rate for a specific period then a lower rating based on ROM. But I see no basis for a 50 or 60% rating in these notes......

The definition is what makes me think con leave counts. I was unable to work and under the care of a doctor and therapist for over the 6 weeks that you need to get the 60% rating.

"What stands out to me is the Convalescent leave for 8 weeks.... which usually calls for a temporary 100% rate for a specific period then a lower rating based on ROM. But I see no basis for a 50 or 60% rating in these notes......"

He would not get this unless he gets SC. Then he could.

What is SC? Service connection? If so, then yes, I do have that for certain.

Edited by Quaymar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an update...

I just had the last of a series of 3 bilateral epidural injections in my lower back due to lower back pain. If those don't work, I will be facing yet another surgery on my lower back this time. This would be in addition to the fusion I already had on my upper spine. I have missed another 7 days of work due to these injections as well.

If I should need the surgery, should I put it off until I get out or have it done while I am still on active duty?

Edited by Quaymar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are on active duty then you should get it done on active duty. I wouldn't trust the Va. on my back surgery, now that's just my opinion.

Rediit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • alexpainter earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • catyvaz1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      First Post
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use