Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Very Depressed, And Was Wondering If There Is A Time To Throw In The Towel.

Rate this question


Papa

Question

I have been waiting for over 820 days for a claim that is still in gathering evidence. Appeals that no one knows about. P&C exams that I'm suppose to take, but the VA and QTC have no clue about this. The 1-800# were you make an appointment for them to call you back, but they do not. You can not get your Law Firm to call you back. My Parkinson's, DMII, PN, PTSD, etc. are taking its toll on me, and was wondering if there? What the crap am I talking about? Quit? My ass!! Never Never Never!! Just want to choke someone at the Houston RO.

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Something very strange happened early this morning. My wife came into our bedroom and said the VA was on the line. I thought it may have been Washington DC, but it was the 1-800 Peggy number. So, after waiting for about 5 minutes, Peggy comes on the line and says how may I help you!! Told her that they called me, silence. So I told them what I wanted, and she said the average waiting time for claims to be in the "Development Stage" is a little over 310 days. Told her mine was almost triple that, and she said that was just an average. Mine must be playing hell with their averages.

Ask her about the PTSD claim for an increase that is almost 24 months old.

Response to both were the Houston RO will be calling me. Told the lady that the Houston office has never and most likely never respond to mine and/or the call center's inquiries.

You would think the Houston RO would want to get rid of claims like mine to get their timeline averages down. Like most government agencies you are graded on timelines for bonuses and promotions. But, now a days that does not seem to matter. JMHO

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Papa, That is the one! I knew you would hear something! Mine still says Pending Decision Approval. Do you remember how long some of the others claims stayed in Pending Decision Approval?

Why arrive at the grave relatively unscaithed, rather than to skid in sideways yelling "Holy Crap! What a Ride!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Papa, That is the one! I knew you would hear something! Mine still says Pending Decision Approval. Do you remember how long some of the others claims stayed in Pending Decision Approval?

This older claim was in "preparing decision" for about 20 days, and it went back to "gathering evidence". I did receive a letter from the VA stating that that would set up an exam for me with QTC. 1800 Peggy told ne that all she sees is the letter, and QTC has no clue. JMHO, but if the VA can not find a way to deny a Veteran within one year, they need to award.

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's kinda like back in the old days when you got short you knew that last day would come,,and like most things it did come!..cheers pops ..have faith..that day will come

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

I agree with Papa. Entitlement to VA benefits is a RIGHT we earned by our service. The VA employees are charged with administering our earned benefits fairly. So, yes, if the VA cant think of a valid reason in a year as to "why to deny", then yes, they should award our benefits.

Social Security promises a decision in 120 days. My daughter worked for them, and, beleive me, they better have an extremely compelling reason as to why the claimants claim was not decided in 120 days. If an exam was not scheduled until day 100, then why? If the doc didnt send the exam, why didnt you call his office? If more evidence is needed, then why did you not call to find out why that evidence is not on file.

I never understood why civilians at social security get better treatment than Veterans. Its bull.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Autumn , something you stuck a cord with me personally:

"and they inform the local VA medical personnel in indirect ways on how to conduct their business."

Indeed they do.

When the VA began to malpractice on my husband (by misdiagnosing a heart attack as a sinus infection)

my husband was employed at the same VAMC and rushed from his station to the VAMC ER

When I discovered the malpractice I also seemed determined to try to find out why it even happened.It had a snowball affect and I know the exact hour and the day it began because the VA ER certificate was my first piece o evidence for my FTCA and 1151cases, dated August 13,1988.

In those days Internet was VERY limited and I used to go to Corning College law library to try to find M21- and any other regs that I didnt have.

I found something at one point that startled me and it also became part of my evidence.

M21- in their VA Physiciam's Guideline Manual dated early 1988 , actually stated that, when an employee is ill or injured or whatever and treated at the ER, the doctor must take steps to have them be able to return to work as soon as possible.

Bingo- no wonder they treated Rod inappropriately!

A few years ago they told a civilian employee who slipped on a piece of pie in the MC hallway that she had simply sprained her ankle and told her ice packs and aspirin would help and then she was presured to return to work 3 days later (as my husband was in 1988) ----but she could hardly walk. She had in fact broken her ankle and VA paid her a settlement when she got a lawyer (FTCA).

They almost killed a friend of ours, another Vietnam vet too, who was also a VA employee,same hospital.

In his case they told him he had hemorroids but it was cancer, that rapidly advanced I got him his money for that. 100% plus SMC.

The very fact that a good IMO can totally overcome a negative C & P ,in many cases, tells me that these C & P doctors are not adequately doing C & P s and worse yet, what kind of care do they give to VA patients in a non C & P situation?

Then again how many C & Ps are done by non MDs these days at VA. Something is wrong with the whole picture and things started to get bad ,or some reason , in my opinion, when the VA became a Cabinet post.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use