Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Lawyer For Dro Review

Rate this question


abean

Question

My husband has a claim in for schizophrenia. We have PLENTY of medical records to document, our fight has been w/ service connection. We have a DAV guy, but I'm not impressed w/ him cause he hasn't even looked at claim. The DRO appeal has been pending for over a year now (Nashville) He was issued SSDI several years ago for same dx with no fight. I went ahead and filed a TDIU claim just to cover my bases...

I've been working/researching this claim myself since DAV is worthless. I try my best to keep hubby as stress free as possible. I have a full-time job and 3 teenagers, so needless to say, I've not been able to dedicate a lot of time to the appeal as I would like to cause his c-file is HUGE!

I'm seriously thinking of handing it over to a lawyer. It's getting a bit stressful for me. Good idea, or no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Yeah, I knew the sc would be the hard part since it took so long for him to get help, and even then it was done by force.

The letter for the dropped claim was for his previous claim of mycoplasma infection, joint pain, miagrane, fatigue, etc. associated with his time in the Gulf. He had a nexus letter for all of this, but was denied and was in process of appealing. The letter he sent the VA was before his dx of schizophrenia. It was very scattered, and paranoid and he apologized for any financial and political hardships he might have caused our country. The letter was dated 12/30/05. He started the house fire 1/6/06 believing the place was bugged. When he was in the VA hospital after the fire, a claim for schizophrenia was started for him by someone. I was unaware of this until we filed a claim for schizophrenia in July 2010 after my husband had been stable, and compliant w/ meds for some time and we no longer had a fear of a relapse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The letter for the dropped claim was for his previous claim of mycoplasma infection, joint pain, miagrane, fatigue, etc. associated with his time in the Gulf. He had a nexus letter for all of this, but was denied and was in process of appealing.

Are the issues above, active claims at this time ?

Does the veteran want to continue a pursuit of SC for the issues listed above ?

If yes, please post the exact reason/s for denial, from the rating decision.

I would probably start this as a new topic, if the veteran has interest in pursuing

these any further.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He still has the rash (just noticed I forgot to mention that one) from time to time, and he still has everything else but the headaches. He's not had one of those in years. He has smrs for all of the above as well as nexus letter from outside doctor who had treated him for many years after service. I'm not sure he still wants to pursue any of it because of his breakdown before while appealing it. He was granted 0% for a scar on his nose, but everything else was denied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

As Carlie says the nexus will be the thing. If you can go over or supply the lawyer will all records both SMR's and personnel records there may be something in their that indicates he was breaking down before he was discharged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've got to request his military file, but I know he had a few write ups for behavior (not respecting authority & wrecking a humvee are two that i can remember)so maybe that'll help.

I did speak to him about refiling the old claims since his knee has been giving him fits. He seems up for it, and we do have plenty of smrs for those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use