Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Well!

Rate this topic


doogie

Recommended Posts

I did recieve dependant acceptance for my wife after 24 months Well that was good

BUT, with the VA there is always a BUT

I am still denied on my heart claim the Va keeps saying it is a congenital bicuspid valve since i started the claim in 1984 ,i have given them evidence from my DR and through QTC that it is normal , i don't get it

I asked for a increase of 30% PTSD comp ,they also stated i did not get 50 +% because they said i had PTSD when i enlisted ,i was not diagnosed until 2010 with PTSD ,and they write me a letter asking me was i asking for IU that they were confused.I don't know what to do now [should i ask for 100% IU and a increase for PTSD both or PTSD and 100% IU???? I do not get it

I also have multiple forms from the navy hospital stating the diagnosis as DNEPE or [did not exist prior to enlistment] [can they not read the diagnosis] I sure am frustrated and confused

OK! i do not have any more hair to pull out

And i have gritted my teeth so much that now i have upper and lower falsies

Maybe i will just contact a VA lawyer on MONDAY and see what he says????

Any suggestions???

Edited by doogie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I did recieve dependant acceptance for my wife after 24 months

doogie,

Please update your profile at hadit, to show your current level of SC as is shown as

zero percent. If you need help doing this just let me or a Moderator know.

BUT

I am still denied on my heart claim the Va keeps saying it is a congenital bicuspid valve since i started the claim in 1984 ,i have given them evidence from my DR and through QTC that it is normal , i don't get it

Members can provide the best guidance if you will post exactly and completely word for word

(minus personal info like name, claim #, address, etc...) what the decision states

in their words.

I asked for a increase of 30% PTSD comp ,they also stated i did not get 50 +% because they said i had PTSD when i enlisted ,

In reading this part I am understanding it as, when they originally granted you SC for

your PTSD, they supported the grant under "aggravation"which would not be a reason

to prevent an increase. If you can post the VA's info on this just like above.

and they write me a letter asking me was i asking for IU that they were confused.

Did you submit a completed and signed 21-8940 or communication expressing

you felt you were unemployable due to an increase in the severity of your SC'd conditions ?

I don't know what to do now [should i ask for 100% IU on 30% increase for PTSD both or PTSD and 100% IU????

I do not get it I sure am frustrated and confused

Can't provide good guidance without the answers to the above.

Maybe i will just contact a VA lawyer on MONDAY and see what he says????

Any suggestions???

I'd get some answers here first prior to calling a lawyer.

JMHO - carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Doggie

Did you actually tell the military or VA that you had PTSD prior to service or did they just decide you had it based on something you told them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did recieve dependant acceptance for my wife after 24 months Well that was good

BUT, with the VA there is always a BUT

I am still denied on my heart claim the Va keeps saying it is a congenital bicuspid valve since i started the claim in 1984 ,i have given them evidence from my DR and through QTC that it is normal , i don't get it

doggie,

This is in reply to your questions with consideration of the info you

provided attachments for.

What have you submitted from a doctor to VA

that states you have a cardiac condition of ______________

and that they have either

1) reviewed your SMR's and it is their medical opinion that

your cardiac condition( diagnosis) is a result

__________________, as evidenced in SMR's and

and provided their medical rationale by stating how and and why there is a relationship ?

OR

2) your cardiac condition is secondary to an already SC'd condition,

and provided their medical rationale by stating how and and why there is a relationship ?

I asked for a increase of 30% PTSD comp ,they also stated i did not get 50 +% because they said i had PTSD when i enlisted ,i was not diagnosed until 2010 with PTSD ,

From the decision you posted, I do not read where that the vba adjudicated your SC for PTSD

as anything other than "direct" SC - so that would not matter whether you had any mental health

problems prior to enlistment or not. Either way - this is not even a factor for consideration with

a claim for increase for your PTSD.

PTSD was not a condition listed for recognition in 1966.

How about posting the decision that granted SC for your PTSD at 30 percent.

and they write me a letter asking me was i asking for IU that they were confused.

I DO see in your NOD that you requested an increase of comp for PTSD

from 30 percent to at least 50 percent but no more than 70 percent.

I Do Not see where you submitted any evidence to support an increase in disability.

Your attachment shows that you referred vba to SSA benefits.

Do you receive SSA benefits?

If yes - did SSA adjudicated in your favor, due solely to conditions that are SC

or solely to PTSD ?

If yes, did you submit a copy of the decision to vba or provide vba with a signed ROI

to obtain a copy of the SSA evidence and decision ?

I don't know what to do now [should i ask for 100% IU and a increase for PTSD both or PTSD and 100% IU????

I do not get it

I also have multiple forms from the navy hospital stating the diagnosis as DNEPE or [did not exist prior to enlistment] [can they not read the diagnosis] I sure am frustrated and confused

The sentence above has no relevance unless your PTSD was adjudicated, to be SC as pre-existing

prior to service. Please post the entire decision that granted your SC for PTSD at 30 percent.

carlie

OK! i do not have any more hair to pull out

And i have gritted my teeth so much that now i have upper and lower falsies

Maybe i will just contact a VA lawyer on MONDAY and see what he says????

Any suggestions???

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use