Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Congress Orders Va To Fix It

Rate this question


Berta

Question

“Unanimous Senate Vote Tells VA to Use Texas Model to Speed Processing

This morning we share especially good news for our Veterans and families: On November 29, Senators voted unanimously to order Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) to produce a plan to end the delays processing Veterans’ disability compensation claims. Too many veterans have suffered too long through VBA’s delays and denials.

Here is how this important development unfolded in the past two months. On September 21, under harsh questioning by Representatives, VBA testified before the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee hearing that there is no public, comprehensive plan to end the lengthy delays Veterans face when seeking VBA disability benefits.”

http://vetlawyers.co...a-claim-crisis/

The September backlog hearing they refer to in this blog from Bergmann and Moore is here:

http://veterans.hous...rike-force-team

There are certainly things VA can do to alter the backlog. TheTexas Model has been viable but I have some suggestions to the Texas model that I hope the Texas Veterans Commission will consider.

In my opinion, no one is minding the store at many ROs, when a denied claim is certified to the BVA.Many BVA transfers need not even occur,if probative evidence has been ignored.

Denials that totally ignore probative evidence in the decision and Evidence list are not being challenged right away by vet reps and VSO or by the claimants themselves.

But a claim that lacks the evidence the specific evidence that the VCAA letter calls for, will still languish in the long appellate process, although the denials might come faster, if the backlog is reduced.

I am anxious to see the "plan" VA comes up with and wonder how long that will take to prepare.

We, as claimants, need to realize the VA cannot handle a lot of rhetoric in a claim or a response to a SOC.

State things as briefly as possible and refer to enclosed evidence to support your point.

And by all means challenge a decision that contains a legal error by asking them to call a CUE their decision.

This wont stop the NOD clock but this tactic saved me probably a 3 year wait when I used it last year and it produced my award letter very fast.

I used it again, as well, a few weeks ago.

I canvased some vet reps who never thought of doing this but I found that it can work.

In my experience the VA will call a CUE on themselves if they are requested to do that by a claimant if the VA has committed a legal error in a decision during the appellate process that would manifestly change the outcome and the decision , if the error had not been made.

As with a traditional CUE claim filed on a denied and unappealed decision, the medical evidence must be clearly established as this tactic relies solely on legal error in a decision with appeal period still pending.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I could tell you about some useless things at the VA but it looks like you guys are already upset.

Berta is correct: Many claims that go to the BVA need not go if the RO had not ignored what was in there. The BVA will send it to the AMC where it can sit for years, and then a group of 8 year olds will write a denial based on logic from a magic 8 ball.

There are some folks in leadership that I get the sense don't care about the Vets really, but more about how important they are in DC. There are many Vets in my office and we do care, and see what is happening. I would disband VHA and hand everyone a Blue Cross/Shield card with premiums paid.

Denials happen because it saves the VA money. Your first claim has an 85% chance of being denied. A very small % of those ever gets appealed. So from their POV it makes sense to deny the claim. After I won at the CAVC the BVA decision was written like an ass covering document by the BVA judge. They magically found in my favor. All the evidence was suddenly "valid". Hmmm...

Prior to the case going to the CAVC, I had a phone call 2 1/2 years ago with the Board's General Counsel Mr. Campbell who told me that we were in fact enemies. So I am grateful for the EAJA.

Unless Congress writes a law or the President changes the rules: Nothing will change much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Berta, Hopefully, this time something will be done! I just don't understand why the VA's raters all seem to be against the veteran and try to find reasons to deny. So many claims are no brainers and they still deny them like the funds will be coming out of their bank accounts. Are they trained to deny, deny until we die?? Are their bonuses based on denials and not just all of the packages they work?? My experience with every C&P examiner has been that they examine you, ask you questions and act like they are listening and then when you get your decision in the mail, the C&P examiner states that your conditions have nothing to do with your military service. That is what is broken with their system. It seems like they train all their employees to assume that we are liars and trying to cheat the system. Until they completely change their current way of thinking, we will not see any significant change.

And where is that wonderful internet based system that we were supposed to have by now to track our claims???? I sure hope it isn't Myhealthyvet, because I find that system virtually useless!

I honestly think that the RO's actually try to help us out. i do believe that the C&P doctors (mostly all are PA's) are the ones that really screw us. Case in point. My RO sent an exam back to the C&P doc. She asked if ANY previous injury could have aggravated my injury due to a tank rollover accident. he opined that it couldn't. The initial wording should be if the tank accident caused the injury. This RO took it upon himself/herself to assume that there may have been an injury before enlistment that was adversely affected by the tank accident. She/He actually helped me determine how i am going to pursue my NOD. Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

This is not the first time they have been told to fix it.

This may be their response::

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The ONLY things that will Force the VA to change involve penalties of one kind or another, and changes in the laws.

VA regulations that narrow or restrict provisions in the laws should be invalid.

Time limits must apply to the VA, with penalty when they are breached.

The VA must have time limits that are at least as restrictive as those placed on veterans.

CUE must apply to decisions that are clearly and blatantly improper, regardless of why.

If a veterans claim takes years to be decided, the veteran must have a similar time frame to challenge the decision.

Reasonable lawyers fees must be paid by the VA when it's actions forced a veteran to hire a lawyer.

When a blatantly improper VA action is involved, the veteran must be compensated for any costs and loss associated with the entire process.

When VA lawyers admit the process is adversarial, it is, and it's contrary to existing law.

The law must be changed, or past unfavorable decisions set aside.

Subtraction of work credit for denial reversed by appeal or further administrative actions.

Less work credit for denials than approvals.

Awards of additional retroactive compensation due to delays or improper denials.

Subtract the administrative cost of improper denials from Bonus allowances.

Do not pay C&P Examiners for incorrect or incomplete Exams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

My theory about VA. They are doing exactly what our government wants. If Congress wanted VA to be fixed it would of already happened. Congress is the biggest bunch of phonies ever assembled and about all that they are beholding to is leadership in their Party and the people who give them money.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Well said, Pete! If the Koch brothers want something done they send an order to one of their monkies in congress who is on the payroll and it gets done. With vets congress stands around, and says how sorry they are for all the homeless, jobless, legless vets, and then the congressmen looks in their mailbox for checks from Crossroads GPS, Moveon.org, or Mother's for Walmart. Our political system is just a whorehouse. No wonder vets get dirty water thrown in their faces. The masters of the universe think we are fools and suckers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use