Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

[Update] Va Nod Letter

Rate this question


11cvolley

Question

I contacted a va lawyer and told him about my case and to see if he can help me. Its been over a year since I filed my nod and my nod is only with the review officer which someone told me means that're about to start the long process but others have told me it means my nod is about done and I'll get a decision soon. IDK which is true. The lawyer asked me if I am on SSDI for the ptsd and when the last time I worked was. I told him yes on the SSDI and I haven't worked since mid 2010. He then asked if my va doctor and "va therapist" (social worker) support me getting 100%. I told def my therapist does and she told me the doctor agrees with her. The lawyer then tells me he can def win my case and hurry it up. All I pay is 20% gross amount awarded and 10% of the money awarded to me, equalling 30% and no out of pocket fees. Should I retain the lawyer?

Edited by 11cvolley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Gee ,I realized ,re reading this that in my husband's case it was the same as yours.

"I never saw a SSDI doctor. SSDI went off my VA medical records."

First they (SSA) awarded for a CVA (stroke) (now 1151 CVA) and after we asked for reconsideration then SSA awarded solely for PTSD,and both awards were based only on his VA medical, and psychiatric records.

The SSA PTSD award had a EED more favorable then the CVA award,which it trumped -sort of , but this became problematic when VA awarded both of these claims,100% P & T for the PTSD and then 100% P & T for the 1151 stroke.

If anyone else here is in similar situation, they can and should use both SSDI awards for 2 independent disabilities the best way they can for proper VA SC awards.

So do you think the VA will award me some form of 100% or what are my chances?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just checked my statues on e-ben. The prep for decision on them reducing my asthma from 30 to 0 has went make to pending decision approval. It was at the prep for note stage. This really irritates me because the senator's office said he made some phone calls and was told that the VSO isn't going to work on my NOD for 70% ptsd until they finish up the claim to take away my asthma rating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't think you need a lawyer. Your case is pretty simple. If you are on SSDI for SC reasons your TDIU is almost a given. You need to keep track of your paperwork or get someone to help you do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you need a lawyer. Your case is pretty simple. If you are on SSDI for SC reasons your TDIU is almost a given. You need to keep track of your paperwork or get someone to help you do that.

I hope so. I just hate this waiting game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you need a lawyer. Your case is pretty simple. If you are on SSDI for SC reasons your TDIU is almost a given. You need to keep track of your paperwork or get someone to help you do that.

Should the fact that I am on SSDI be enough for the VSO or what more should I do? Do I need to send them the SSDI letter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If VA is aware of the SSDI award and has obtained those SSA records, they should award TDIU or 100%.

It is the disability question (# 18 I think) on the TDIU form 21-8940.

I always advise vets to expand on checking Yes to that question and refer ,in Remarks part, to separate page telling the VA you get SSDI solely for the SC condition you are claiming..if that is the case.

“Should the fact that I am on SSDI be enough for the VSO or what more should I do? Do I need to send them the SSDI letter?”

“This really irritates me because the senator's office said he made some phone calls and was told that the VSO isn't going to work on my NOD for 70% ptsd until they finish up the claim to take away my asthma rating. “

That might well be the way it should be done.

I had to get the AO people (Phila RO) to address my pending CUE claim before addressing my AO IHD claim. The CUE had been in progress for 8 years at that point.(Buffalo RO).I filed the AO IOHD claim in 2010. They did address the CUE as well as the AO claim.

This concerns me:

“the VSO isn't going to work on my NOD for 70% ptsd “

and

“be enough for the VSO “

You can prepare the NOD yourself by focusing on why the VA didnt award TDIU,when they awarded the 70%. They gave you a reason you need to overcome by evidence.

I think too much dependence on any VSO is a BIG mistake.

When I called the DAV NSO long ago (who repped my husband) to tell him my husband had just gotten SSDI award solely for PTSD (his claim was for higher rating of his 30% PTSD) the DAV rep told me SSDI awards aren't binding on the VA and he didnt think it would help but it maybe might help. He was very negative.

I then asked him if he ever had heard of Washington V Derwinski and he of course said No.I took the same training course he had taken from NVLSP and he said he never heard of Washington V Derwinski !!!!!! How many vets had similar SSDI awards that he saw no merit in??????

The only reason I called him was to let the DAV know that we were submitting this evidence to the VARO.What a dope.

John said :

"You need to keep track of your paperwork or get someone to help you do that. “

He is SO RIGHT!

I have stacks of files related to VA here dated back to 1988. If I didn't file and tab this stuff in manila olders as it all transpired (I even needed stuff from decades ago for my current claim) I would definitely be in the crapper by now.

You stated:

“I do remember the reason given was basically an increase isn't warranted. “

If the VA was aware of the SSDI award, and did not consider it nor follow up on getting the SSA records, they have violated 38 CFR 4.6 and that decision contained a CUE.

The SSDI award could also determine the proper EED and additional retro ,if that award preceded the TDIU claim date by one year or less.

I posted the M21 regs here the other day on that.

And personal example.

Husband filed 21-8940 in Fall 1992. (August I think)

SSDI award was solely for PTSD with EED of Nov 1, 1991.

His retro VA EED (posthumous award) was Nov 1, 1991.

This was before the laws changed on accrued benefits.

VA only paid me 2 years accrued. Under the new law they would have paid me 3 years accrued based on the EED due to the SSDI award.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use