Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Medical Coverage For Service Connection

Rate this question


Roger Louis

Question

First my intent with this posting is to ask a question concerning medical or dental care so if I started the topic in the wrong place please tell me how to start in the correct place. Today I received a letter from the VA Regional Office that said they decided that I have a service connection of 0% for Temporomandibular Disorder (Claimed As bruxism) which is associated with post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) . My rating remained at 40% where it was prior to this claim and the decision. Of course I will submit a Notice of Disagreement for the entire claim. However the goal of my claim was not to increase the percentage it was to attempt to gain dental care from the VA.

I am not sure that this decision provides for that care so if anyone has any suggestion I would welcome hearing them. This was a two part claim the first as mention was for Bruxism and the second was for Meniere's disease associated with sensorineural hearing loss. While I am rated at 0% for hearing loss and the VA has provided hearing aids the denied this portion of the claim stating the was not in my record to support the claim.

I did receive a C&P examination for Bruxism however a decision was made concerning the claim for Meniere's disease base on a review of my file apparently since I did not receive a C&P. Both issues show up in the Ebenefits report of the review by the examiner even though I did not receive a C&P examination for Meniere's. One point of interest is the during the examination and in the written report if was evident that the dentist did not think that Bruxism would result from PTSD. Apparently the Regional VA office thought otherwise to some degree.

I want to thank everyone for their service and support to this web site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I have tried 3 times to upload a copy of my award letter from the VA and have not been able to accomplish that. I am in the process of deterring what to say in the NOD and would like opinions based on the letter. Is there specific procedure for cutting an pasting or attaching a file to the forum. I have received a lot of excellent information from the forum and would like to find out the best way to quote the various laws and regulations based on everthing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Roger,

I typically scan the document with my printer into a PDF. My printer does OCR, which allows the PDF to include readable text that can be copied/pasted. If you try to attach an entire document, be sure that you redact any personal info like name, SSN, DOB, etc... before you scan the document in. I personally prefer the previous method because you can get to the meat of the details.

Regarding quoting and assembling documents, check the FAQ on the main Hadit page. Also, the below links can help you out too.

Here on Hadit, there is a self help guide:

http://www.hadit.com/veterans_self_help_guide.html

Another Hadit contributor, FanaticBooks, has a great site dedicated to assembling claims.
http://www.howtoassemblevaclaims.com

There is a wealth of great information here. The search feature is great.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Vync

I had the "Toothache Blues" after the Army dentist got done with me. There is an old Lonnie Johnson blues number called "Toothache Blues" and it is so dirty I don't know how it ever made it onto a record back in the old days. Lonnie Johnson is singing the part of the dentist and Victoria Spivey is in the chair. "Now baby, I told you I was going to have to grind." "Doctor, Doctor grind a little slower" heh, heh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Class IIa does not apply to bruxism. Service Trauma is defined as a line of duty related injury to teeth by an external force. Combat or training injury, getting hit by a tool, even a car accident while on AD all qualify. Bruxism, or just biting on something hard are not considered service trauma.

It would be a mistake if VBA rated the OP for bruxism. The VBA classifies bruxism as a neuromuscular symptom of stress, not a separate disease. Bruxism has no disease diagnosis code, no rating criteria. Contrary to what the dentist told the OP, it is now widely accepted that PTSD may cause or worsen bruxism. Most likely, during the course of completing the TMJ DBQ, there was evidence of a disorder in the joint. Since bruxism may cause a TMJ disorder, the OP was granted TMJ secondary to the PTSD, at 0%, based on the ROM measurements.

Class III and VI eligibility rules are clear: The dental treatment must have an evidenced based, direct impact on the medical condition. Examples include removing infected teeth before joint surgery or heart valve replacement. There is substantial evidence in the medical literature that a dental abscess can seed a prosthesis with bacteria, having potentially catastrophic consequences. Providing dental to a PTSD patient may improve overall health, but the same can be said about providing needed dental care to anyone with any disease.

it seems logical and fair that the VA provide dental care to correct problems caused by a service connected disease or its management. But, that is going to take a change in the CFRs, which means complaining to your elected representative, not VA Eligibility or the dental clinic. Besides bruxism, a whole lot of damage to teeth is caused by the dry mouth people get from many different drugs. For the VA to absorb this potentially huge new workload, it is going to take more dentists, more clinics, more money. Again, all of this has to happen in Congress.

There is absolutely nothing in the VADIP programs that exclude service connected conditions from coverage. The OP was given bad info. By the way, I think Metlife has a better program, since its high option has a $3000 yearly cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The following quote from the Veterans Affairs participation Guidelines for (VADip), Nov 1, 2013 "The VA Dental Insurance program (VADip) will offer veterans who are not eligible for VA Dental Care....." suggest that the insurance does no cover service connected issues. While 3K coverage for MetLife is a significant amount it will not begin to address the issues that Bruxism over a period of time can cause. The award was for Temporomandibular disorder (claimed as bruxism) at 0% which is not compensable. The dentist during the C&P said that I did not qualify for TMJ and that he did not think that I had a service connected dental condition or disability resulting from combat wounds or service trauma. Apparently based on recent VA guidance or the US Court of Veterans Appeals recent decisions which there are some the VA regional office disagreed with the Dentist and his staff or possible they thought that the condition further aggravated a medical condition. Not sure what an OP is but I am sure that I will learn, however I realize my limits as a layman. Depending on who interprets the CFR for the VA, and others. When the intent is to care for the veteran in my opinion the law is sufficient to allow the VA to cover as I understand has happen in the past veterans with many issues. In any even I want to again thank everyone for all of the excellent information posted which I am sure make my NOD and subsequent appear stronger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

OP = Original Poster

No need to convince me. But, you should know what you up against. I wrote exactly what I would tell you if we were meeting to discuss your dental eligibility.

VADIP came about primarily to provide an option for Veterans not eligible for VA out-patient dental care. However, any Veteran, dental eligible or not, can enroll. Same premium, same benefits.

It is going to take a strong grass-roots push for elected officials to vote to extend dental eligibility to cover all Veterans for dental problems secondary to service connected diseases. Senator Bernie Sanders, has introduced a bill that would provide dental care to all Veterans. People should write their Senator and request they support the bill. At this point, it has no chance of passing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use