Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Section C. Decision Review Officer (dro) Review Process

Rate this question


Guest allan

Question

This is the html version of the file http://www.warms.vba.va.gov/admin21/m21_1/mr/part1/ch05/ch05_secc.doc.

G o o g l e automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web.

To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:3nC0w...t=clnk&cd=1

Google is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.These search terms have been highlighted: decision review These terms only appear in links pointing to this page: officers <H3 align=right> Section C. Decision Review Officer (DRO) Review Process</H3>

Overview

    • In this Section
      This section contains the following topics:


    • TopicTopic NameSee Page10Overview of the DRO Review Process5-C-211DRO Duties and Responsibilities5-C-312DRO Jurisdiction and Authority5-C-713De Novo Review</B>5-C-1114Informal Conferences5-C-1515Making the Decision</B>5-C-1816Exhibit 1: Informal Conference Report5-C-2217Exhibit 2: Appeal Response Form5-C-23





10. Overview of the DRO Review Process

    • Introduction
      This topic contains an overview of the DRO review process.


    • Change Date
      December 9, 2004


    • a. DRO Review Process
      The table below describes the stages of the Decision Review Officer (DRO) review process.


    • StageDescription1The appellant elects the DRO review process.2The DRO conducts a de novo review of the prior decision.
      Reference: For more information on de novo review, see M21-1MR, Part I, 5.C.13.

      3Based on a review of the evidence of record, is there enough evidence to make a new decision?
      • If yes, the DRO makes a new decision.
      • If no, the DRO
      • pursues additional evidence considered necessary to resolve the claim, and/or
      • conducts an informal conference to obtain additional evidence from the appellant and his/her representative.
        • upholds or overturns the original decision
        • works with the appellant and his/her representative to
        • focus the issue, and
        • fully explain the decision in an effort to resolve the appellant’s disagreement, and
        • begins to prepare the appeal for BVA review by sending an SOC, unless there is a full grant of benefits.

          Reference: For more information on sending an SOC, see M21-1MR, Part I, 5.D.





          11. DRO Duties and Responsibilities

            • Introduction
              The DRO performs an array of duties with the purpose of resolving issues raised by the appellant and his/her representative. This topic contains a definition of DRO and information on
              • the DRO duties
              • the Veterans Service Center Manager (VSCM) duties
              • the DRO work measurement responsibilities
              • which work measurement codes to take, and
              • the acting DRO.



                  • Change Date
                    August 19, 2005


                  • a. Definition: Decision Review Officer
                    The Decision Review Officer (DRO) is a senior technical expert who is responsible for holding post-decisional hearings and processing appeals. The DRO may have jurisdiction of any appeal.


                  • b. DRO Duties
                    The table below lists the duties of a DRO.
                    Notes:
                    • The DRO is a member of the Appeals Team but is under the direct supervision of the Veterans Service Center Manager (VSCM) or assistant VSCM. The Appeals Team Coach may assign work to the DRO.
                    • The composition of the local appeals team may vary. At some ROs, the team may consist of only DROs, while at others, it may include
                    • DROs
                    • RVSRs
                    • VSRs, and
                    • Claims Assistants.



                        • DutyDescription1Hold informal conferences and formal hearings.2Evaluate the evidence of record including the need for additional evidence as a result of information obtained during the hearing.3Make a decision.4Make direct contact with appellants and their representatives.

                      Continued on next page





                      11. DRO Duties and Responsibilities, Continued


                        • b. DRO Duties (continued)


                    • 10
                    • 9Play a central role in employee development, including
                    • 7Work together with station and service center management and staff to develop consistency and accuracy in first-line decision making.8Perform Master Rating Specialist duties, including
                    • 6Provide feedback to local management about
                        • DutyDescription5Provide feedback to each Rating Veterans Service Representative (RVSR) as to the cases handled and appealed without regard to whether the decision was
                          • upheld
                          • reversed, or
                          • modified.
                            • trends
                            • general quality, and
                            • areas in need of training.
                              • acting as a resource for other employees, and
                              • directing management of the appellate workload.
                                • mentoring new rating specialists
                                • participating in the training of RVSRs
                                • coordinating training opportunities with BVA and local medical centers, and
                                • providing feedback to Compensation and Pension (C&P) managers at all levels.
                                  • Certify appeals prior to transfer to BVA, and
                                  • coordinate the transfer of appeals to BVA.


                                    Continued on next page





                                    11. DRO Duties and Responsibilities, Continued


                                      • c. VSCM Duties
                                        The VSCM (or assistant VSCM)

                                        d. DRO Work Measurement Responsibilities

                                        e. Which Work Measurement Codes to Take

                                        If the DRO or VSR …Then he/she takes EP code …prepares an SOC only172.holds an informal conference which results in the withdrawal of the appeal173.

                                        Note: Annotate the informal conference report when taking the EP.

                                        [*]conducts a de novo review and issues a decision

                                        [*]prepares a clear and unmistakable error (CUE) decision, and/or

                                        [*]holds a traditional hearing

                                        174.

                                        f. Acting DRO

                                        When the DRO is temporarily absent or disqualified because he/she participated in the decision under review, the VSCM of the RO where the hearing is scheduled appoints an acting DRO.

                                        The acting DRO

                                        [*]shall have considerable understanding of the issue that is the subject of the hearing

                                        [*]shall not be less than a GS-12, except in extraordinary circumstances, and

                                        [*]cannot have participated in the decision being reviewed.

                                        12. DRO Jurisdiction and Authority

                                        Introduction

                                        The DRO has jurisdiction over several appellant issues. This topic contains information on

                                        [*]the DRO’s jurisdiction over

                                        [*]appellant issues, and

                                        [*]subordinate issues

                                        [*]issues not under the jurisdiction of the DRO

                                        [*]the jurisdiction of the visiting DRO

                                        [*]the DRO’s decisional authority

                                        [*]the DRO’s lack of authority in subsequent hearing requests

                                        [*]how the DRO is bound by a BVA decision, and

                                        [*]how DRO bargaining is prohibited.

                                        Change Date

                                        June 19, 2006

                                        a. DRO Jurisdiction over Appellant Issues

                                        Once the DRO assumes jurisdiction of a case, he/she works in partnership with the appellant and representative to resolve all issues covered by the NOD in accordance with the laws and facts in that particular case. The appeal remains with the DRO until it is forwarded to BVA.

                                        The DRO has jurisdiction over a rating issue that the appellant raises during the hearing provided the issue was part of the rating decision being appealed that is the subject of the formal hearing or informal conference.

                                        Notes: The DRO has

                                        [*]de novo review jurisdiction only over appeals for benefits governed by

                                        [*]38 CFR 3, and

                                        [*]38 CFR 4

                                        [*]limited jurisdiction over a rating issue raised during an informal conference or formal hearing, provided the issue was part of the rating decision that is the subject of the hearing, and

                                        [*]no jurisdiction over an appeal on a rating decision made by the DRO him/herself.

                                        Continued on next page

                                        12. DRO Jurisdiction and Authority, Continued

                                        b. DRO Jurisdiction Over Subordinate Issues

                                        When an issue is favorably decided, the DRO assumes jurisdiction over any subordinate issues, including

                                        [*]evaluation and effective date, and

                                        [*]any inferred or ancillary issues that are encompassed by that favorable decision.

                                        Reference: For more information on inferred or ancillary issues, see

                                        [*]M21-1MR, Part III, Subpart iv, 6.B.3, and

                                        [*]M21-1MR, Part IX, Subpart i.

                                        c. Issues Not Under the Jurisdiction of the DRO

                                        The DRO does not have jurisdiction over

                                        [*]Committee on Waivers and Compromises (COWC) issues

                                        [*]loan guaranty

                                        [*]insurance, and

                                        [*]hearing requests concerning a denial of benefits from a medical determination rendered by a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical activity for

                                        [*]clothing allowance

                                        [*]automobile and adaptive equipment, and

                                        [*]specially adapted housing.

                                        d. Jurisdiction of the Visiting DRO

                                        If the DRO at the host office participated in the decision being reviewed, a visiting DRO may be requested to hold hearings or conduct de novo review. The visiting DRO will render a decision in such claims, but not maintain jurisdiction of the appeal.

                                        However, the VSCM at each RO has the authority to grant the issue on appeal based on a de novo review or CUE without referral to the visiting DRO. The VSCM is not permitted to delegate this authority to anyone else.

                                        Note: Submit a written request to C&P Service when a specific delegation of this authority is necessary.

                                        Continued on next page

                                        12. DRO Jurisdiction and Authority, Continued

                                        e. DRO Decisional Authority

                                        The DRO may

                                        [*]amend, reverse, or modify a decision based on de novo review

                                        [*]amend, reverse, or modify a decision based upon new evidence, or

                                        [*]exercise single signature CUE authority.

                                        Exceptions:

                                        [*]Unless a CUE exists, the DRO cannot revise the decision in a manner that is less advantageous to the appellant than the decision under review.

                                        [*]A decision in which CUE is cited requires the signature of the VSCM if the decision would

                                        [*]reduce a service-connected evaluation(s), or

                                        [*]sever service connection for a disability(ies).

                                        Note: The VSCM’s signature is required on the rating even if the reduction or severance based on a CUE would not cause a reduction or termination of total benefits paid.

                                        Reference: For more information on DRO decisional authority, see 38 CFR 3.2600.

                                        The DRO has no authority to participate in a formal hearing if he/she participated in the decision under appeal.

                                        Example: If the DRO makes a new decision based on de novo review and the appellant subsequently requests a formal hearing, the DRO does not have authority to conduct the formal hearing.

                                        f. No DRO Authority in Subsequent Hearing Request
supervises the DRO
may exercise all duties and authorities of the DRO
assigns duties that are appropriate to the DRO’s grade level and position, as time allows, provided such duties do not conflict with the DRO’s status as an impartial and independent decision-maker
appoints acting DROs during the temporary absence or disqualification of the DRO, and
assigns a rating or authorization panel, whose members did not participate in the decision, to hold a personal hearing in
cases where the traditional appellate review process has been elected by the appellant, and
unusual or emergency circumstances.

The DRO

[*]maintains an accurate record of the actual hours spent performing DRO duties at different regional offices (ROs), should the need arise, and

[*]prepares a report for the VSCM or Appeals Team coach at the RO where the service was performed.

Note: ROs borrow or loan the corresponding amount of time. Charge the DRO’s time against the cost center for the rating activity.

Continued on next page

11. DRO Duties and Responsibilities, Continued

Use the table below to determine which work measurement codes to take.

Note: Complete EP credit continues to be recorded by the RO having jurisdiction of the claim. Maintain these reports under RCS VB-1, Part 1, Item 13-005.000.

Reference: For more information on which EP credit to take, see M21-4, Appendix C.

4Based on evidence gathered, the DRO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use