Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Hbp Cauing Retinopathy Granted Seconday To Diabetes Mellitus

Rate this question


Guest Berta

Question

Vets often fail to realise how many secondary conditions they can get secondary SC for due to DM II.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp05/files2/0509997.txt

I have a vet who is in same criteria as this claimant- the VA did award him 40% months back- they forgot the rest of the award- it should be 100%-

They are working on that. He has cataracts from the diabetes and has had two heart stints.And an SSA award for the SC diabetes.

This above decision shows the steps needed to medically associate HBP to DMII:

no other known NSC etiology for HBP

and direct medical nexus of the HBP to the DMII---

dont forget -HBP is well known to the VA to be potentially secondary to DMII as their DMII Training letter

(posted at the old hadit) reveals.

ratable skin disorders, ED, vision problems, PN, heart and brain trauma if vascular disease, etc etc-

numerous conditions are able to be service connected on secondary basis to DMII.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Vets often fail to realise how many secondary conditions they can get secondary SC for due to DM II.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp05/files2/0509997.txt

I have a vet who is in same criteria as this claimant- the VA did award him 40% months back- they forgot the rest of the award- it should be 100%-

They are working on that. He has cataracts from the diabetes and has had two heart stints.And an SSA award for the SC diabetes.

This above decision shows the steps needed to medically associate HBP to DMII:

no other known NSC etiology for HBP

and direct medical nexus of the HBP to the DMII---

dont forget -HBP is well known to the VA to be potentially secondary to DMII as their DMII Training letter

(posted at the old hadit) reveals.

ratable skin disorders, ED, vision problems, PN, heart and brain trauma if vascular disease, etc etc-

numerous conditions are able to be service connected on secondary basis to DMII.

B) I was diagnosed with diabetes type II at the time I had a silent heart attack, my eyes are blurry 40% of the time I have cataracts on both eyes they said small and beginning?? I was rated 60% 10% for each limb neouropthy tingling in legs, feet, arms and hands. 20% for diabetes 10% ptsd. Each time I call to check on clain they tell me it is at review board. Their question has been which came first the diabetes or

the heart disease. I have researched for over a year and everything I have sent them says that diabetes is (IS) the leading cause of eye troubles, feet troubles and heart disease and attacks (silent ones like mine.)

I think they are waiting on my death----OPPS we don't have to worry about MikeG anymore.. Good Luck and

GOD BLESS MikeG>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike- you are right and as you said- silent ischemia (a heart attack without much pain due to diabetic neutopathy) is often the first major symptom of diabetes-

There is a wealth of info on the net regarding this condition as symptomatic of diabetes-

also any candidia, (thrush), foot problems, and certainly cataracts are most likely due to long standing diabetes-

All in VA's DMII training letter-they know it -but the claimant has to list all their conditions in the claim for anything secondary to DMII.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use