Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Chronicity And Continuity Of Symptomatology

Rate this question


Fat

Question

Can anybody state in layman terms the meaning of these two words as it pertains to the VA and being service connected.

1. Chronicity

2. Continuity of Symptomatology

All help is appreciated especially from the elders on the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I would think it means the degree of the disability/condition and how its related to military service!

Chronicity- - Record of Events as being Constant!

Continuity-- Ties-- Continuous Whole'' Script''

jmo

..................Buck!

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

There are 133,067 claims decisions at the BVA web site that show how the VA applies and defines those terms.




"Where the evidence shows a "chronic disease" in service or "continuity of symptoms" after service, the disease shall be presumed to have been incurred in service. For the showing of "chronic" disease in service, there is required a combination of manifestations sufficient to identify the disease entity, and sufficient observation to establish chronicity at the time. With chronic disease as such in service, subsequent manifestations of the same chronic disease at any later date, however remote, are service-connected, unless clearly attributable to intercurrent causes. If a condition noted during service is not shown to be chronic, then generally, a showing of "continuity of symptoms" after service is required for service connection. 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(b). "

http://www.va.gov/vetapp14/Files7/1456889.txt

Some conditions fall under the Chronic Presumptives, a different regulation ,explained in this decision..

This is an important point from the above regulation.

" If a condition noted during service is not shown to be chronic, then generally, a showing of "continuity of symptoms" after service is required for service connection. 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(b). "

There are over 100,000 decisions with the word continuity in them.
It is often the cause of many denials.

The veteran must prove that an inservice injury,disease, event etc, caused th current diagnosed disability the have now, and that there are treatment reocrds that reveal continuous treatment for the same disabiltiy.

Example..I had a vet whose condition was deemed as not Sced by VA.
we proved it had to be SCed.
Part of the award involed the extensive evidence I found that
not only was the condition misdiagnosed by the Mil,
the veteran had ,since leaving service been continuously treated for this condition.

His private doc agreed with what I found in his SMRs, and the VA awarded, after about 12 years, 2-3 trips to BVA, and twice at the CAVC, before I met him.

A lack of documented continuous treatment, after getting an award for a disability the VA has already SCed, can cause them to propose a reduction in the rating..

We have done radio shows on the Chronic presumptives but I will talk to Jerrel about doing one on chronicity and continuity in the future.

.



GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Berta as usual breaks down the Policies and wording of the VA, so that we can start picking up the trail, without being on standby!!!

100% PTSD

100% Back

60% Bladder Issues

50% Migraines 
30% Crohn's Disease

30% R Shoulder

20% Radiculopathy, Left lower    10% Radiculopathy, Right lower 
10% L Knee  10% R Knee Surgery 2005&2007
10% Asthma
10% Tinnitus
10% Damage of Cranial Nerve II

10% Scars

SMC S

SMC K

OEF/OIF VET     100% VA P&T, Post 911 Caregiver, SSDI

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Basically chronic means long standing and continuity is continued chronic symptoms of the malady. Sometimes va uses the lack of treatment to try to overcome or rebut this rule but recent fed.circle.rulings overturned that theory. If your malady was chronic in service and it's still treated for today its chronic. Read 38cfr 3.303 (b) it explains in detail how to use this against the va. I used this after being out of service for over 30 years with no service treatment records on record and I won. If used correctly you can box va in where they have no choice but to award. Pay close attention to paragraph (3) of this rule. Also read Davidson v. Shinseki (fed.cir.Sept.14, 2009). This validates 38cfr 3.303 (b) Good Luck...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

If you have a SC condition and the rating is not permanent as in 20 year SC I would at least get treated for it at the VA to show continuity and chronicity of your SC symptoms. This is also a good way to show that your condition is getting worse or at least static as in P&T ratings. You can get treated for it outside the VA as well, but show up for some sort of treatment at the VA. I see a VA shrink even though I get my real care from private doctor. The same goes for all my SC conditions. VA recently said I had had a heart attack. I hot footed it to my private cardiologist and had a stress test. He told me I had not had a heart attack and it was a false positive. I am not telling the VA that I did not have a heart attack. Let them believe their own bad medical science. I wonder if I am already rated 60% for CAD and the VA says I have had a heart attack as indicated by their own testing if I should ask for an increase? I am not that greedy since I already get "S" unless I could get a higher rate of SMC. I am sitting at about total plus 80% now. If my P&T becomes real P&T that would be just fine in about 6 more years.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use