Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Is Qtc & Ves Indemnified Against Vet Lawsuits?

Rate this question


rootbeer22

Question

Folks:

Found out that a couple of QTC Doctors seem to be in disagreement about my Cardiac C & P Exam now which is holding up a second phase of my claim ? They can't seem to come to a decision about my Cardiac results and the QTC rep today said they've had may case for review longer than is usual? Further, I have a Echocardiogram report from Madigan Army Hospital that shows that I have heart valve disease from back in 1998. So, say a Vet is in the same circumstances as me, but gets a clean bill of health from the Cardiac CP Exam despite the smr records showing service connected heart valve disease, then a year or so later, he has a significant heart attack and cannot work?

Does or would QTC bear any responsibility for the missed or wrong diagnosis or for giving a clean bill of health when it is later found not to be warranted? Also, does VA indemnify CP Exam Contractors for being wrong with their diagnosis? Sure, I understand that it's a Claims and Pension exam but there is no denying that it's also a medical opinion as well so is that opinion legally binding on the doctor's company that they work for?

Thanks...Rootbeer22

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Rootbeer, I suggest that you determine exactly what type of valve disease you have from your medical records ( Mitral?,Leakage?,of what valve, stenosis ,what type ,etc,etc etc, and google it and then maybe you can determine what the C & P doctors are looking for.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Berta:

Based upon my best intel...the QTC Rep said the are looking at two things IVD and LVT specifically. The 1998 Echo said I have atrophy and

regurgitation in my Left Ventricle Valve and slightly above normal limits on another valve. The heart and lungs x-rays were clear and the heart was 'not" enlarged. EKG was unremarkable? Blood pressure was unable to be sufficiently controlled for numerous years despite trying almost every HBP medication to man and I ended up with 40 MIL of Lisinorpil and a cocktail of other BP Meds that I take on a daily basis. But absolutely cannot tolerate beta blockers...Rootbeer22

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Folks:

Thanks as usual and I know further speculation is probably not warranted at this point? I got an update that QTC Staff today has directed their 3rd reviewing QTC Cardiac Doctor to expedite his review on my case and finish it up.....so we'll get it wrapped soon? I'm thinking about working on a NOD for those areas that were denied sc on the original part of my claim? Then later, I'm thinking about working with Dr. Ellis to address my contentions with an IMO that are denied service connection after the NOD comes in...who knows, maybe I'll get good results anyway with the NOD? That all said, I'm still convinced that a lot of it is the "Luck of the Draw" in terms of the people and doctors that handle a Vet's claims and how they function? Although I have very good (SMR) evidence; how it's read and interpreted is most of it anyway....

Take Care and Godspeed .....Rootbeer22

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use