Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

AGENT ORANGE

Rate this question


BUZZ

Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Probably not unless he has proof that the prostate problems occurred on active duty. He should keep an eye on his PSA levels. I was diagnosed with PC and my PSA was a 2.8. If his PSA goes up a half a point in a six month period he should have a biopsy done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Prostate problems for AO are presumptive. There is no need to show direct causation or evidence of it in the STRs. The earlier you put down your marker, the sooner you get a rating-even if it's just a 0% for the moment. That's often half the battle. 

7527Prostate gland injuries, infections, hypertrophy, postoperative residuals: 

Rate as voiding dysfunction or urinary tract infection, whichever is predominant.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Asknod

 

        You say all prostate problems are presumptive for AO?   I thought it was just cancer.  I got such poor treatment for the infections I had a low grade urinary tract infection  for months.  I also had diarrhea all the time.   The little pills were my constant companions.   What is the difference between dysentery and severe diarrhea with it coming out both ends to where you cannot get out of your rack except to puke or #2.     My SMR's just show one bout after another for my whole tour.   I was so run down that as soon as I got back to the states I got some lung infection and was out for almost a month in an Army hospital.  Records missing, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

John, I too feel the AO regs cover only prostate cancer and not other forms of prostate problems.

I checked at BVA but could not find anything to the contrary there.

This is a good claim:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp15/Files2/1517997.txt

The vet, a Korean War vet with DMZ proximity service, in the timeline in the AO Korea regs, available here ,

was granted 3 AO conditions, to include Prostate cancer by the BVA.

This Crap gets me SO angry.  Korean War,  thus a very elderly vet , proven AO exposure in Korea, and the f---ing ROs cannot read and properly apply the Korea AO regs to him????

For all the countless great VA employees who DO work hard every day, under VBA or VHA, they also work side by side with incompetent idiots and this is how the ROs have caused the backlog.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

 I stand corrected. I'll check Westlaw for cites. I believe it is, or can be, the predicate, especially if cancer develops down the road. Better to be safe than sorry. AO claims are payable to the day you filed regardless of outcome (win or loss) at the time. I'm fond of the 12 ga. technique on AO. You stand a good chance of hitting something.  Remember all the Vets who filed for DM2 (and those who didn't). When VA changed the rules in 2001, any who had filed previously were awarded a date commensurate with it and paid retro comp. Don't be afraid to climb out of the CFR box and blaze a new trail.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

What about the veterans that are registered with the AO Registry ? does the EED go by that date? in-case something comes up on the veteran years later...like Prostate Cancer?

OR should he go ahead file a AO Claim  win or lose?  just to get in the books  so to speak!

 

 

...................Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use