Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What does it mean when a claim is reopened

Rate this question


jfrei

Question

Getting nervous and anxious but ever time it's near they call to reschedule. I understand the reasoning just sucks because the first was they failed to contact my lawyer before scheduling on a date he couldn't do. This time the pope. I know I need new and material evidence just want to know what happens next after it reopens?

Edited by jfrei
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

The biggest thing is that you preserve the effective date.  See 38 CFR 3.156.  

When you are asking for a "reopening" it means your claim was denied, and you have new evidence for them to consider.  If they like that evidence, and its considered probative, you can get an earlier effective date, if/when benefits are actually awarded.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Ok so I've been told by my attorney that the DRO looked at my file and hinted he was to deny the CUE but possibly reopen the claim based on new evidence just curious on what that means if it does reopen does that mean they can still deny the claim based on new evidence or just that you get more time to show why the evidence is in your favor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Can you give more detail on your claim?  the exact timeline and what happened, doesnt have to be every detail just

June 2014 filed claim for ___,____

Sep 2014 Decision issued for __,___, Denied

October 2014, filed NOD and sent in new evidence, request DRO Hearing

May 2015, Sent in new and compelling evidence.

 

 

Reason being that I cant help out like i would like to because i dont know the details or the important dates.

There are 3 (really 4) ways to deal with a denial

 

Oh well - let it stand and dont do anything

NOD - You are saying I dont agree, and I want to keep my original retro filing date. NOD preserves your initial filing date for retro, you fight it and win you get the retro date back to when you first filed for it.  You have 1 year from the decision date (on the letter) to file.

Reopen - I have agreed that you were right to deny me, but now i believe i am right and am filing again.  Your retro only goes back to the date you actually reopened it. Can be done anytime after a denial

Reconsideration - This is a newer way to go, however i dont see any reason to do it.  it basically says i dont agree and i want you to relook at the old evidence and any new stuff i have.  They may or MAY NOT recognize the old retro date. 

 

I dont see any reason to use a reconsideration.  however if you are talking about reopening i would like to know when your denial was so i can say if you should just file a NOD, etc.

Edited by USMC_VET

70% - PTSD

->50% - OSA (Secondary to PTSD)

30% - Bilateral Pes Planus w/Plantar Fasciitis

30% - Migraines

10% - Tinnitus

20% - Back

0% - bilateral shin splints

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Can some tell me what form do you use to reopen claim.   I was denied by BVA but now have Imo which I should have sent the first time from VA doctors????????????

You can do it on line @ VA.gov, eBenefits, just like filing an initial claim, you can file to reopen, or reconsider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use