Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Proposed Reduction

Rate this question


texboyer

Question

I recently attended a C&P Exam after requesting an increase for Post Lumbar Laminectomy rating of 40%. The examiner could not access my records due to a computer glitch, and refused to review any information I brought with me. I could not perform the forward flexion exam and so she simply wrote it up as 70* (which is impossible for me to achieve). She also answered "No Response" for the question regarding whether I walk with an assistive device (I walk with a VA issued cane) and whether I had debilitating episodes (I was bed ridden for 3 months last year and not allowed to drive or go to work). This triggered a Proposal for Reduction from 40% to 10% for my lumbar condition. They tell me that I must request a hearing to prevent this reduction. I have NO idea how to respond or how to prepare for a Proposed Reduction Hearing. I assume I must request a Hearing, but how do I fight this as it is an obvious issue of a problem with the examiner. She was an NP, by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Did the C&P doctor use a goinometer (see image below) to measure your ROM or did they just "eyeball" it?

GRF-12-1000.jpg

If the doctor did not use one, be sure to include that in your response. Far too many CA C&P examiners feel overconfident in their ability to measure ROM degrees. What they do not realize is the fact that just a one degree difference can mean being assigned an incorrect rating percentage tier.

Keep in mind the VA's C&P doctor is not the final decision here. If you can get evidence from your doctor, preferably a specialist, showing you meet criteria to help maintain your 40% rating, get and submit it.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 2/26/2016 at 12:20 PM, SemperFiGeek said:

If you are still within the 60 days from the date of the proposed reduction letter then file a new claim for increase for that issue. It will trigger a new exam.

you know what Material Improvemet mean? not going to VA hospital or Clinic in the 5 years would mean improvement? I'm 100 P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 2/26/2016 at 12:20 PM, SemperFiGeek said:

If you are still within the 60 days from the date of the proposed reduction letter then file a new claim for increase for that issue. It will trigger a new exam.

you know what Material Improvemet mean? not going to VA hospital or Clinic in the 5 years would mean improvement? I'm 100 P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

ndy856 You are adding onto a 2016 posting. If you have a question, start a new original post. If you are P&T, you should not be going to a new exam. Start a new post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

GB is correct, you should move this to a new topic, so you get more answers.  Since Ndy856 is new, I will answer it just this once, but GB may want to split this in a new topic.  

    NDY856  Great question.  No, material improvement is not proven by the Veteran simply not seeking treatment at the VA any more.  There can be many other reasons that the Veteran is no longer seeking treatment any more "other than" material improvement:

1.  The Veteran may have moved, and its no longer practical for the Veteran to go to the VA for his treatment.  

2.  The Veteran my have discontinued VA treatment and sought treatment instead in the private sector.  

3.  The VAMC may change its policies and not longer offer that treatment at that VAMC site.  An example of this is the Va lose a doctor, and no longer be able to offer care, "at least" until a physician replacement is found.  This could take years!  

       The important thing is this.  Its material improvement in symptoms, not material improvement in treatment.  Treatments vary over time.  The doc may try pills, he may try counseling, or many different treatments..this does not mean the Veteran "materially improved", it means either the Veteran or his doctor altered their treatment plan.  

        It is true that it looks kind of bad, when a Veteran goes to the VA, gets his benefits, then stops treatment.  But, its just not that simple.  The Veteran could easily have decided that VAMC treatment was not helping so he chose alternatives, instead.  There are many alternatives, such as holostic therapy, nutrition therapy, chiropractic, and a host of others.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use