Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

The BEST for your Claim

Rate this question


USemperMC

Question

I found out with my claim that the best way to get a more satisfying experience with a new claim or an appeal/reconsideration is to have a medical expert review your records. I used Valor Compensation Consulting for my appeal. I submitted my records to the company and apparently the examiner is a former Compensation and Pension examiner for the VA. After I received the results and finding I took it to my VSO for the appeal. It was much faster and easier since the Medical Professional had the experience and new what to look for in my records for my  appeal and connection ability. Also it took much less time for the raters at the VA to review because they had substantiated credible medical opinion. I won my appeal and cant thank Valor Compensation Consulting enough!!! Also they are veteran owned and unlike law firms they don't seek a percentage of the benefit awarded. Look them up I know they helped me they can probably help you too. www.valorcompensationconsulting.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I did have a DRO instead of a hearing officer. My process for the NOD and Appeal I want to say about 14 months. Having the IMO really helped. I used Mrs.Spangenberg before the company was started and since she knew my VSO in Ohio he asked her to look at my claim. Once I heard that the company had actually been started I had to let people know. I know that when I was helped it was a free consultation, a quote for the service and time to completion for the opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You requested a DRO Review, not a DRO Hearing, right?  Could you share anything else about your initial Denial and what condition the IMO helped reverse, as New & Material Evidence?

Your reversal was made by a DRO as a result of the official DRO Review Request, not the Automatic RO  Denial Review, triggered by Receipt of New & Material Evidence that was not available for review by the original rater; right? The Auto Review is done by a SVR or actual DRO, giving deference to the original rater's decision.

14 months from NOD to DRO Review, is not to shabby. Keep in mind, none of the original raters or for that matter, any raters are involved with your DRO Review. It's all on the DRO, he does his old "DE Novo" review and makes a decision giving no deference to the original Denial.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Correct it a DRO review. And I was initially denied connectivity for a torn rotator cuff with arthritis that was the big one. The evidence that the IMO provided was that the exam was done incorrectly with improper range of motion testing and provider did the report on the wrong shoulder. So even though the imaging results showed the tear and she reviewed the left instead of the right. Also my Jaw was broken in service and even with documentation and titanium plates and screws I was denied TMJ. On the grounds that it was likely than not a condition of grinding my teeth. That was reversed and I am able to receive dental care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

For info only, did YOU ever pick up on the WRONG shoulder Exam, either from the C & P DBQ or the actual Denial Letter?

How long after your Denial, before you submitted your NOD? Did you initially include New & Material Evidence, other than your IMO?

Did you use a VSO-Rep for your initial claim? How much of a help or hindrance was he/she?

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I have to put in a good word here for Valor as well. I, after reading some other posts, decided to check them out as well, and so far I am impressed. They even pay for you to ship your records to them for review. Husband/wife team, wife was the former c&p examiner, i spoke with her and she was very knowledgeable, in fact after filling out the new client application online she was able to view some of my prior c&ps. They are also willing to work with vets on payments and have a referral program, but by no means am i posting to try to get the referral bonus, i feel they truly want to help vets. I just sent my packet off to them, and will post the IMO's when received so everyone who needs a reasonably priced IMO can see if this might be an option for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I am also obtaining an IME from Dr Ellis in Oklahoma City, my appointment is in April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use