Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question about retro

Rate this question


MCCFR97

Question

I thought I read this somewhere the other day but I can't seem to find it. I have a speculative question so I'm looking for opinions obviously for my own knowledge. if you make a claim, then get denied, you do a NOD and submit further evidence. If you did the initial claim and you were diagnosed about 9 months earlier, can the DRO choose to make your retro pay from the day you were diagnosed?

Every claim is different but this is a cancer claim with a 100% rating if service connected, so in the medical world it's kinda cut and dry, you either have cancer or you don't and it's either service connected or it's not.

Also this Dr. Did the IMO and is a specialist in the field.

With this info and your opinion, would you humbly ask for this additional retro at the DRO? I read here someone said "it's not about the money, it's about the medical coverage", although true, an extra 9 months of retro, if it's in the power of the DRO, would....pay off a car? Or any number of other things that must be dealt with when this kind of diagnosis happens. To make this happen, Bring it to his/her attention? They don't have to give it to you and I would not fight it.

What's your opinion? I thought I read on here that a DRO can elect to give retro from the day of diagnosis but it could not be longer than 12 months. Or did I wish I read that....

thanks in advance for all opinions or thoughts both for and against....

Edited by MCCFR97
Spelling and punctuation
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

There are some conditions that, if claimed within a year of leaving service, are presumptive of service in certain areas or under certain conditions (http://www.benefits.va.gov/warms/docs/regs/38CFR/BOOKB/PART3/S3_309.doc). Generally anything that you file for within a  year out can be considered service connected if evidence can be found for it in your SMRs. 

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I'm on there, (on the list of illnesses) but, I was diagnosed 20 years after leaving the service. Which is still no problem since medical evidence states the cancer may not manifest until 15-20 years after exposure.

so according to your pdf, I don't qualify since it was not a year since I left service.

thanks again....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Retro is usually the File date of the new claim but can be granted on a facts found basis up to 12 months before the file date.

Any condition Medically DX'd within the 12 months after discharge, regardless of anything being in your SMR's, is considered a SC condition. I thought I read a yr or so back, I & A Vets are currently getting a 5 yr window after discharge for DX's, not sure.

Is your cancer on a VA Presumptive list, maybe AO? Many a Nam Vet, stricken with Prostate Cancer, was shocked when their 100% Temp SC was reduced to 30% about 3 or so months after surgery.

Semper Fi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
16 minutes ago, Gastone said:

 

Is your cancer on a VA Presumptive list, maybe AO? Many a Nam Vet, stricken with Prostate Cancer, was shocked when their 100% Temp SC was reduced to 30% about 3 or so months after surgery.

Semper F

Yes, my cancer is on the presumptive list (Miltiple Myeloma Stage 3), I actually knew nothing. Completely out of left field. No cancer in my family, and I'm way out of the demographics for this (like for my race and age group, I'm like less than .1% a year). It was a buddy from high school, who is an ICU nurse at UCLA who told me I should google "USMC and Multiple Myeloma" when I first go diagnosed last year. That's what started this journey. As I said, its just a question. For the VA I am not in one of the groups covered (that would be Vietnam Vets w/exposure to agent orange, or a marine who was at Lejune between '54-'84?) Somewhere in there, but I'm not one of them, which is why I fall in the boat of proving the nexus.

Yut...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

What rational did the Dr use linking your Cancer DX, to the Crotch?

What exactly are you claiming exposure to, while on active duty? Which presumptive list are you referring to, AO? Your MOS was?

Any chance you could post a redacted copy of your VA Denial Letter?

How's your Hearing?

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use