Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Lawyers & Ro.

Rate this question


Guest fla_viking

Question

Guest fla_viking

Dear Fellow Veterans & Friends

It will be interesting to see lawyers who are use to going into a court of law to enforce laws that are being violated. To have those same lawyers see the corrupton they have to navigate through in the RO system and not beabel to get anyone to do anythig about it. Maybe the right to hire lawyers at the VA level wont be such a threat because no lawyer would want to pratice in such a one sided system. I also presume lawyers will have complet cases when they go forward and will try for the ajudicators to spell things out as clear as possibel. I wonder if the VA will take perfectly preparied cases that should be SC from the start and drag them out for years.

I saw on Fox 28 this morning where in those who worked at the collapse of the world trade center towers have very serious health problems. THey have been awarded money by the courts but workmans comp will not pay. The wife of one said they were waiting for her husband to die so the claim would not have to be paid. It was reported that many injuried workds just gave up because they made the process so hard to go through. These people are represented by lawyers to and getting a royal screw. They even have acess to courts and have orders for payment yet the payer doesnt have to pay. The Wife talked about all the econimic stress they go through having to beg for money to pay bills. This naton does that to so many military, veterans, workers that it is a common pratice. They should out law the systems that allow those pratices to happen agianst the disabled.

Terry Higgins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Terry- I am thrilled that vets will finally have this choice to get a lawyer but I also am concerned about things that you have brought up here too----

Next month I am going to start checking out lawyers in NY to see if any are even interested in representing vets---or able time wise-

my personal lawyer is so overwhelmed I don't think he could do this-but will check-

I am hoping the fee will be 20% of any award- and that the fee is on contingency-and only due upon award-

Lawyers will have to wait for their money if it is contingency-

meaning lawyers will make sure the claims do not take forever-

I have it all doped out in my mind-----what a dream!

Lawyers- Having a combo of the methods and ability of Nancy Grace, Johnnie Cochran, and Ron Kubee---- dancing circles around the VAR0s-

spouting VA legalise like it is their second language, whipping out evidence like it is the Holy Grail and

high fiving the veteran---- in less than a year after filing the claim-----

then again---

I couldnt find one to help me in 1997-with my FTCA-and they sure missed out on a lot of cash.

Maybe this time when I call them -they might change their tune if they know there is money in VA claims.

Again though -I worked for lawyers a long time-

No doilies and no files that they have to put in order-

And they can say No too- if they assess that there is no possible approach that would work.

I personally believe that 95-98 % of all valid claims can succeed.

Another thing-I was talking to regional counsel the other day (we BS about claims a lot) and he said in his mind a denied claim is not a valid claim-

I reminded him-a denied claim is either one that just hasn't succeeded yet-

or its evidence hasn't been handled right by the VARO as most claims seem to get granted anyhow-

It is odd-RC knows FTCA and Sec 1151 in and out , and 38 CFR-but the other regular claims process-what we go through under 38 CFR- is not really part his background.

My point is that lawyers are smart but we cannot expect them to be omniscient-they will need our help on our claims.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terry has a good point and I disucssed it on another thread about lawyers. No matter who represents you the RO is going to be the RO. They will continue to violate title 38, the US Code and regulations no matter what. After all who is going to impose the law upon them? The Kangroo Court of Veterans Claims - hahahahhahahahahahahhahahahaha. You can't even use one of their rulings to force the RO to abide by the law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The thing about hiring lawyers to help with claims is that in complex claims you hand the stress of arguing the case over to the lawyer. There is nothing harder than trying to argue your own claim in front of a hostile Review Officer. I have gone pro se on other things and it is hard when you own ass is on the line to remain objective about the facts. You know you cannot let emotion get involved in your argument with the opponent. Getting a good lawyer who really knows his stuff may take a while since this will be a new area of law and the attorneys have to get up to speed, but if there is money to be made I think they will be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Fellow Veterans & Friends

It will be interesting to see lawyers who are use to going into a court of law to enforce laws that are being violated. To have those same lawyers see the corrupton they have to navigate through in the RO system and not beabel to get anyone to do anythig about it. Maybe the right to hire lawyers at the VA level wont be such a threat because no lawyer would want to pratice in such a one sided system. I also presume lawyers will have complet cases when they go forward and will try for the ajudicators to spell things out as clear as possibel. I wonder if the VA will take perfectly preparied cases that should be SC from the start and drag them out for years.

I saw on Fox 28 this morning where in those who worked at the collapse of the world trade center towers have very serious health problems. THey have been awarded money by the courts but workmans comp will not pay. The wife of one said they were waiting for her husband to die so the claim would not have to be paid. It was reported that many injuried workds just gave up because they made the process so hard to go through. These people are represented by lawyers to and getting a royal screw. They even have acess to courts and have orders for payment yet the payer doesnt have to pay. The Wife talked about all the econimic stress they go through having to beg for money to pay bills. This naton does that to so many military, veterans, workers that it is a common pratice. They should out law the systems that allow those pratices to happen agianst the disabled.

Terry Higgins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

There are some attorneys that are licensed medical Doctors who have changed their occupation to assist Social Security claimants. These persons having the Medical Knowledge would greatly benefit any vet overexisting the services of any representative either attorney, or Veterans representative.

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use