Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C-File Law Suit

Rate this question


RBrogen

Question

Curious if anyone here has gone through the FOIA and had to ultimately sue the VA in Federal District Court to force them to provide their C-File in a more timely manner?  FOIA's are required to be fulfilled in 20 business days by law assuming no special circumstances.  Obviously the VA isn't going to respond to anything in 20 days but when it goes on for 6 months or longer that is ridiculous and slows our ability to address claim denials/issues quickly.  I just filed a FOIA appeal and was sent a letter from the Office of General Counsel, Veterans Administration that my FOIA request was DENIED under FOIA Exemption 6 but remanded to be provided via the Privacy Act.  The issue is that the Privacy Act process has no deadline so they can take as long as they want, while the FOIA actually has deadlines and a process for relief when they don't do what they are supposed to.  From my understanding, this is a tact the VA uses to confuse people into thinking it is a Privacy Act request and not a FOIA request.

Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

 

rackamall.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

FOIAAppealDenial.pdf

10 hours ago, GeekySquid said:

your post brings up an interesting situation. I have to admit you are the first veteran I have heard of being denied their C-File under FOIA Exemption 6. I am sure you are not alone, just my limited exposure to that event.

I did a little quick research and Justice.Gov provides some illuminating points on FOIA and Exemption 6...information you may have or want.

https://www.justice.gov/oip/foia-guide-2004-edition-exemption-6

Second, the Court articulated the general rule that the identity of a FOIA requester cannot be taken into consideration in determining what should be released under the Act. With the single exception that of course an agency will not invoke an exemption when the particular interest to be protected is the requester's own interest, the Court declared, "the identity of the requesting party has no bearing on the merits of his or her FOIA request." (24)

 

further the link reads:

It also is important to remember that while the government may voluntarily or involuntarily waive its right to an exemption when its own interests are at stake, it cannot waive an individual's privacy interests under the FOIA by unilaterally publicizing information about that person. (100) The privacy interest inherent in Exemption 6 "belongs to the individual, not the agency holding the information," and "the fact that otherwise private information at one time or in some way may have been placed in the public domain does not mean that a person irretrievably loses his or her privacy interest in the information."

Essentially what you are saying happened, assuming it is your own c-file, is a violation of the Law and in clear contradiction to SCOTUS several appeals court rulings.

You might just have a legal case if you have the funds to fight it.

Here is the actual denial letter.

Edited by RBrogen

rackamall.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Yes, you are correct that FOIA should garner a response within  20 days.

The VA Central FOIA officer responded to me very fast, but it was just a response- acknowledging the FOIA.

The FOIA info I requested came in about 3 weeks.

I had a fast response to a FOIA I have at the OGC.

The response wanted me to be more specific as to where they could find the info.

I named a specific OGC lawyer, the name of the veteran involved, the name of the private lawyer he had, and a few more specifics as to the dates and what the issue was about, and where they could find the documentation.

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 minute ago, Berta said:

Yes, you are correct that FOIA should garner a response within  20 days.

The VA Central FOIA officer responded to me very fast, but it was just a response- acknowledging the FOIA.

The FOIA info I requested came in about 3 weeks.

I had a fast response to a FOIA I have at the OGC.

The response wanted me to be more specific as to where they could find the info.

I named a specific OGC lawyer, the name of the veteran involved, the name of the private lawyer he had, and a few more specifics as to the dates and what the issue was about, and where they could find the documentation.

 

 

So you were requesting information not directly related to you which is why they wanted to be specific about the exact info so they could protect the privacy.  In my case, I'm requesting MY information that has nothing to do with anyone else.  As per GeekySquids info, I went to the Justice Department website and read exactly what exemption 6 covers.  Conveniently enough, the one piece that is missing from the VA denial letter is the last part of the sentence in the first paragraph of the explanation.  This is literally the first paragraph on the page and check out the bolded part I highlighted which is EXACTLY what the VA is doing.  Denying me my own information.  Full info here:  https://www.justice.gov/oip/foia-guide-2004-edition-exemption-6

Exemption 6

Personal privacy interests are protected by two provisions of the FOIA, Exemptions 6 and 7(C). While the application of Exemption 7(C), discussed below, is limited to information compiled for law enforcement purposes, Exemption 6 permits the government to withhold all information about individuals in "personnel and medical files and similar files" when the disclosure of such information "would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy." (1) These exemptions are a vitally important part of the FOIA's statutory scheme, (2) but of course they cannot be invoked to withhold from a requester information pertaining only to himself. (3)

FOIAAppealDenial.pdf

rackamall.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Just to add- a recent VHA FOIA I sent got the same response very fast- they needed more specific info to search for the info- meantime I found some specific areas of VA ,that might have what I requested..... I have until 8-24th 2019 or they will close that FOIA. 

I dont think the VA might even have documentation of what I seek, but it is worth a shot.

The Local VAMC responed to a FOIA I sent to the some time ago- I was shocked at what I got-

I only asked for redacted copies of any applications for employment for a specific job , within a specific time frame.

They sent me 12 applications, for the specific job ,with the SSA numbers, and full names, contact info on those applicants.

They violated these applicants rights.The info revealed the evidence I was seeking but I burned the applications after I told VA what they did.They showed limited concern.

They violated many disabled veterans rights too because these veterans were part time seeking full time in a VA job they already had done well, yet they hired a non disabled civilian with No VA experience at all - because she knew someone who worked in the same department. All the vets there knew him too.

 

 

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I just downloaded the letter-remanded to the RMC- if they do not react to it timely ( I dont know how to define 'timely' when it comes to the VA,by all means sue them in a District court- you  very seem well versed  in handling that without a lawyer- but please request from the district court , the state where the RMC is, a copy of their Rules and Procedures.

It is a lot to read but a good guideline to this type of action. You will probably get the Prisoner guidelines as well. More prisoners probably file more Pro Se  District Court cases than many non incarcerated people do.:blush:

They have more access to a law library at most prisons then I did when I sued the VA.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
22 minutes ago, Berta said:

Just to add- a recent VHA FOIA I sent got the same response very fast- they needed more specific info to search for the info- meantime I found some specific areas of VA ,that might have what I requested..... I have until 8-24th 2019 or they will close that FOIA. 

I dont think the VA might even have documentation of what I seek, but it is worth a shot.

The Local VAMC responed to a FOIA I sent to the some time ago- I was shocked at what I got-

I only asked for redacted copies of any applications for employment for a specific job , within a specific time frame.

They sent me 12 applications, for the specific job ,with the SSA numbers, and full names, contact info on those applicants.

They violated these applicants rights.The info revealed the evidence I was seeking but I burned the applications after I told VA what they did.They showed limited concern.

They violated many disabled veterans rights too because these veterans were part time seeking full time in a VA job they already had done well, yet they hired a non disabled civilian with No VA experience at all - because she knew someone who worked in the same department. All the vets there knew him too.

 

 

 

 

 

As you mentioned the VA doesn't have a specific time frame unless.  This is the main reason to use FOIA.  The violation should be reported to the appropriate authorities for sure.

Edited by RBrogen

rackamall.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use