Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Fully Developed Claim Closed then Correcting an Error

Rate this question


Kuwaitin08

Question

 OK, back on September 3 I received a notice that said my Higher Level Review was closed and to expect a letter regarding the decision. After about a week having not received the letter I contacted the 800 number and they said it should be there any day.

Today is September 18 and I looked on the VA website for the phone number again and I saw my status was changed from closed to the VA is correcting an error.

Does anyone have any clue what that means or if that is a good or a bad thing? I’m just looking for opinions or the off chance that someone else has experienced this.

75B8A2AB-231F-4A34-935F-7C2361B63D88.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Hard to say BUT the HL Reviewer is supposed to seek CUEs ( clear and unmistakable error) prior to providing a vet and their rep with the formal decision. The regulations on that changed because of a letter I wrote to former Secretary Shulkin.

I made a significant legal argument for that as well as, if a vet requests a reconsideration that should stop the NOD clock.Shulkin changed M21-1MR on that as well. 

Sec.Wilkie sent my last letter to him, to my VARO-but my VARO can;t read.

His office probably just sent a copy however. In the letter I asked that HBP be made presumptive to AO as well as any stroke due to brain ischemia, in any AO veterans, to become an AO presumptive too.

Oddly enough the BVa has made a few awards for HBP due to AO based on the same NAS report I used in my letter to Wilkie. 

Then I figured based on the BVA awards, why wait for a presumptive so I filed an accrued claim on 1151 HBP ,rated by VA long ago ,and deemed "  essential" meaning the VA didn't know what caused my husband's HBP and they malpracticed on it ( part of my FTCA/1151 award) HBP,and  his exposure to AO in Vietnam has already been proven, and since " essential" means the VA didn't know the cause, the NAS report clearly reveals the cause of his 1151 HBP...... AO.

EVERYTHING any claimant needs  know about CUE is here in the CUE forum.The CUE regs have not changed since I first  used them in 2004 for a CUE in my daughter's Chapter 35 claim. They fixed that in 3 weeks.

I filed for direct SC accrued for 6 years , as my husband's surviving spouse.

However the VA has decided to start , by April 30th, considering us claimants as unpaid VA 'employees'...what I mean is read the recent Beware post.

We will, after  April 30th, have to seek CUE ourselves before a final decision can be made.

That means they have to contact us with the unfinished potential decision.

The vet orgs,VSOs, and agents are probably getting knots in their underwear over this.

Good- because many of them don't even know what a CUE claim is.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On ‎4‎/‎10‎/‎2020 at 6:18 PM, Bob Mourning said:

My claim did the same thing. Yesterday it showed closed status and the list of issues was now blank. 

Today, it says the made a new decision and they are correcting an error. 

Does the fact that the issues on appeal disappeared, mean anything?

 

Nope. It is a waiting game now. They may want another C&P exam or just want another opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Theopolis Welcome to Hadit. It occurs when the VA finds a procedural error in your previous claim that would result in a CUE situation if they didn't correct it. It's not a bad thing, and could be a good thing for you. So, the VA has to develop your claim more; maybe another C&P exam or an ACE review/exam. You should get a letter in a week or so. If you call Peggy, they won't tell you much prior to you getting the decision letter. Even after, you still won't get much from them. I had one where my original claim went in on a Supplement, but they denied based on it being a direct disability. I issued a HLR and they came back with a decision like you have. The letter will say that you have 30 days to submit NEW evidence; otherwise they will likely issue a decision. If nothing has changed, you shouldn't have to submit new evidence. Of course, if you do, it will delay your corrected decision. Hang in there until you get a new decision letter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use