Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Long story, Advice Please! EED or Nothing?

Rate this question


taylor99be9

Question

My claims have been incredibly jacked up since 2012, when I was medically retired for Ptsd/Tbi from the military for injuries that awarded me a purple heart.  
 
Granted (50) Percent PTSD from  VA when i was medically retired which is grossly underrated back then, I mean at (50) Percent for PTSD, if those were my symptoms, I would have never even been recommended for a medboard.
Keep in mind that i was AWARDED Social Security Benefits based only my military medical records and the SSDI granted the Disabilities of : TBI With Migraines,PTSD,Adjustment Disorder with Effective Date : 02/22/2010 the so SSDI made the my Effective Date the same day as my Purple Heart date! 


So  “Effective Date”

(June 27,2012) awarded (50) Percent  PTSD,  (10) Percent Tinnitus,(10) Migraines, (10) Gerd.  
Total combined disability rating (60) percent combined rating upon medical retirement date of 
(june 27,2012)


I appealed the rating decision by IDES of the (50) Percent : (PTSD/Post Concussion Syndrome), then on (October 23,2013) awarded (TDIU P&T) on my appeal  from
 (June 27,2012), the  (50) Percent PTSD/TBI Rating  to (70) Percent based “solely” on the (PTSD/Post concussion syndrome) rating that was originally (50) percent from IDES Medical Evaluation Board up medical retirement.  

So in (11/10/2017) migraines and gerd went from (10) Percent each to (30) Percent increase separates , so now with the TDIU P&T based solely on the (70) Percent PTSD/Post Concussion Syndrome so from 
Effective Date : (SMC -S) =
 (11/20/2017 - 03/23/2018) 
(SMC-S) stopped due to me going from (S)  to (SMC-L) based on aid and attendance “solely” due to (PTSD/TBI) Residuals,  and now my (TDIU P&T) 
for (PTSD/TBI) Residuals would from (70)Percent to (100) Percent Scheduler with Effective Date : (March 24,2018) and awarded (SMC-L) that same day as well, with effective date : 
(March 24,2018)

Then granted (SMC-K) effective date : (02/13/2018).

Then with the extra combined rating a side from the PTSD/TBI which 
is (100) Percent rating now and having a now (50) Percent:  Migraines, 
(30) Percent : Gerd, (10) Tinnitus, I go to (SMC-P1) or (SMC-L 1/2) effective date : (March 24,2018) 

Would the (SMC-L1/2) go back to the “Effective Date,”  I was awarded the VA Caregiver for mental health, ie : (PTSD/TBI Residuals was exactly what i was approved for the grant of the VA Caregiver from (July 26,2012) - (03/17/2014) my wife who is also a RN and my VA assigned caregiver, she left me and divorced me, in (2014), then I never followed up with trying to get a replacement caregiver, so i was TDIU P&T 70% PTSD/TBI Residuals : Effective Date : (June 27,2012) and now now im 100 Percent scheduler, PTSD/TBI Residuals P&T  with Effective Date : (March 24,2018)

Ive had or currently have been awarded :

SSDI Effective Date : (02/22/2010)

TDIU P&T Effective Date : (06/27/2012)

VA Caregiver Effective Date : (07/23/2012)- (03/2014)

SMC -S Effective Date : 11/28/2017-04/2018)

SMC-L Effective Date : (03/24/2018)

(70) Percent TDIU P&T to (100) Percent Scheduler based on “same” rating of the PTSD/TBI Residuals that i was given a P&T status for in 2012 anyways 

(100) PERCENT Scheduler
 “Effective Date” : (03/24/2018)

(SMC - P) Effective Date : (03/24/2018)
Based on having the extra (50) Percent a side from the PTSD/TBI.

So basically (SMC-L 1/2) is my current rating. 

And for the record I’ve, tried going the Supplemental Claim route i was denied the  appealed to Higher level review and was denied everything and now went to the Board of Veterans Appeals in Washington they received it on (OCTOBER 17,2019) and already on (January 09,2020) my appeal case is in ( Front of a Veterans Law Judge) I filed a expedited claim based on my file being jacked up since (2012) with ratings and was told by the VA they did grant the Claim  from me for expedited claim.  Is that a good or bad sign or means nothing at all,that the board of veterans appeals granted me expedited/priority, based on my claims being screwed up? 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Hi Taylor; welcome to Hadit. EED's can be totally confusing. You can be denied, receive an amended amount on appeal and yet still have an incorrect amount awarded, etc. Some my disagree, but with your complex situation and with all the variables, I would talk to a good lawyer who specializes in that part of law. IMO. It might cost you 20%, but 80% to you can be a lot more than you trying and getting short changed again. IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Adminstrator

Hi taylor, The BVA will take a closer look at your claim and it will probably take them some time.  I somewhat agree with GBArmy, but I would wait until after the BVA renders a decision as it could all go your way.  Now if it does not and you want to appeal you get to take it to the CAVC in which the VA will pick up the tab for the lawyer at the CAVC level.  This in turn can save you a bunch of retro.  Now if they do Remand back to the BVA you would be on the hook for that portion, but at that time is good to have someone who does this everyday there to fight for you!  

Also the BVA can remand it back to an RO and this part can take a year by itself.  I am sorry this takes so long, but make sure you keep up on appeals as the back pay if far worth it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hello Taylor,

I agree with Shrek, wait until after you go to the BVA for they may grant you everything you are looking for. If not as stated by GB and Shrek then get a lawyer. The main thing is don't miss your deadlines for appeals. Good luck!

I am not an attorney or an a credited VA rep. These are my personal opinions and experiences, always remember what worked for me may not work for you.

You as the veteran are your own best advocate and no one knows your disabilities better than you. It is highly recommended that you as the veteran research and verify that any opinion given meets your specific situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

I agree with Shrek and Paul.  The effective date(s) for smc is always the "facts found".  I cant tell what the "facts found are", that is the date you first met the applicable criteria, but you are probably right, that its consistent with the caregiver.  

Remember, tho, for issues "other than SMC" your effective date SHOULD be "the date of your exit from service" but only if you applied within a year or exit from service.  If you applied within a year of exit from service and the VA did not grant you that effective date, this "could" be CUE.  

Remember, tho, the "limitiations" of effective dates.  They are:

1.  The date you applied.  (Exception:  When you apply within a year of exit from military service).  

2.  Facts found.  This means the date the doc said you were disabled.  

    There are many exceptions to the effective date rules, at least some of which can be in your favor, such as when you apply for an increase.  

     Effective dates are complex.  Right now, my advice is that you wait until your BVA decision arrives.  At that point, if you dispute the decision, consider hiring a lawyer to represent you at the CAVC.  (You need to do that right away after a board denial or if the Board award is at an incorrect effective date..both grants and denials are appealable, but a remand is not appealable until it becomes finalized.  

     It may not be too early to be planning to appeal your board decision.  Remember, eaja pays your attorney fees when you appeal a board decision in most cases, so you pay nothing to appeal.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Broncovet,

Good Morning and I appreciate this forum and the information I'm receiving, but I wanted to respond to applied for disability within a year of service, yes sir, I was medically retired thru the VA IDES medboard, so basically I medically retired from the Army on (June 26,2012) and the next day on (June 27,2012) I had my ratings which is the 60 Percent and being underrated that I speak of.

My (permanent & Total) "Effective Date" says (June 27,2012) for TDIU P&T but they have twice denied it through the higher level review and supplemental claim and leaving the Effective Date the (March 24,2018)

Thanks

Edited by taylor88be8
Adding photos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

You need to appeal the denials of the earlier effective date appeals, if those decisions were within a year.  

HINT:  HLR or supllemental claim "rarely" result in large retro on effective dates.  Reason?  GS11's are not authorized to cut you a 5 or 6 figure check.  This is done by a judge, so appeal to the BVA.  Yes, it takes longer than HLR, but, if you want your money you have to go the distancc.  If you are within a year of the decision(s), then appeal.  If its longer than a year, you can try "prying open" the claims with a previous new evidence submission under 38 cfr 3.156  OR you can try cue.  

You have 2 additional options:

1.  Work your claim yourself or with a VSO.  

2.  Hire a law firm to fight for an EED.  

If you are even considering option 2, contact a firm, give them your cfile and ask them.  If they offer to represent you, you know you likely have a viable winnable claim.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use