Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in What is the DIC timeline?
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Good question.
Maybe I can clear it up.
The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more. (my paraphrase).
More here:
Source:
https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
taylor99be9
My claims have been incredibly jacked up since 2012, when I was medically retired for Ptsd/Tbi from the military for injuries that awarded me a purple heart.
Granted (50) Percent PTSD from VA when i was medically retired which is grossly underrated back then, I mean at (50) Percent for PTSD, if those were my symptoms, I would have never even been recommended for a medboard.
Keep in mind that i was AWARDED Social Security Benefits based only my military medical records and the SSDI granted the Disabilities of : TBI With Migraines,PTSD,Adjustment Disorder with Effective Date : 02/22/2010 the so SSDI made the my Effective Date the same day as my Purple Heart date!
So “Effective Date”
(June 27,2012) awarded (50) Percent PTSD, (10) Percent Tinnitus,(10) Migraines, (10) Gerd.
Total combined disability rating (60) percent combined rating upon medical retirement date of
(june 27,2012)
I appealed the rating decision by IDES of the (50) Percent : (PTSD/Post Concussion Syndrome), then on (October 23,2013) awarded (TDIU P&T) on my appeal from
(June 27,2012), the (50) Percent PTSD/TBI Rating to (70) Percent based “solely” on the (PTSD/Post concussion syndrome) rating that was originally (50) percent from IDES Medical Evaluation Board up medical retirement.
So in (11/10/2017) migraines and gerd went from (10) Percent each to (30) Percent increase separates , so now with the TDIU P&T based solely on the (70) Percent PTSD/Post Concussion Syndrome so from
Effective Date : (SMC -S) =
(11/20/2017 - 03/23/2018)
(SMC-S) stopped due to me going from (S) to (SMC-L) based on aid and attendance “solely” due to (PTSD/TBI) Residuals, and now my (TDIU P&T)
for (PTSD/TBI) Residuals would from (70)Percent to (100) Percent Scheduler with Effective Date : (March 24,2018) and awarded (SMC-L) that same day as well, with effective date :
(March 24,2018)
Then granted (SMC-K) effective date : (02/13/2018).
Then with the extra combined rating a side from the PTSD/TBI which
is (100) Percent rating now and having a now (50) Percent: Migraines,
(30) Percent : Gerd, (10) Tinnitus, I go to (SMC-P1) or (SMC-L 1/2) effective date : (March 24,2018)
Would the (SMC-L1/2) go back to the “Effective Date,” I was awarded the VA Caregiver for mental health, ie : (PTSD/TBI Residuals was exactly what i was approved for the grant of the VA Caregiver from (July 26,2012) - (03/17/2014) my wife who is also a RN and my VA assigned caregiver, she left me and divorced me, in (2014), then I never followed up with trying to get a replacement caregiver, so i was TDIU P&T 70% PTSD/TBI Residuals : Effective Date : (June 27,2012) and now now im 100 Percent scheduler, PTSD/TBI Residuals P&T with Effective Date : (March 24,2018)
Ive had or currently have been awarded :
SSDI Effective Date : (02/22/2010)
TDIU P&T Effective Date : (06/27/2012)
VA Caregiver Effective Date : (07/23/2012)- (03/2014)
SMC -S Effective Date : 11/28/2017-04/2018)
SMC-L Effective Date : (03/24/2018)
(70) Percent TDIU P&T to (100) Percent Scheduler based on “same” rating of the PTSD/TBI Residuals that i was given a P&T status for in 2012 anyways
(100) PERCENT Scheduler
“Effective Date” : (03/24/2018)
(SMC - P) Effective Date : (03/24/2018)
Based on having the extra (50) Percent a side from the PTSD/TBI.
So basically (SMC-L 1/2) is my current rating.
And for the record I’ve, tried going the Supplemental Claim route i was denied the appealed to Higher level review and was denied everything and now went to the Board of Veterans Appeals in Washington they received it on (OCTOBER 17,2019) and already on (January 09,2020) my appeal case is in ( Front of a Veterans Law Judge) I filed a expedited claim based on my file being jacked up since (2012) with ratings and was told by the VA they did grant the Claim from me for expedited claim. Is that a good or bad sign or means nothing at all,that the board of veterans appeals granted me expedited/priority, based on my claims being screwed up?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
2
1
1
Popular Days
Jan 20
11
Jan 21
2
Top Posters For This Question
broncovet 4 posts
Buck52 2 posts
GBArmy 1 post
taylor99be9 1 post
Popular Days
Jan 20 2020
11 posts
Jan 21 2020
2 posts
Popular Posts
GBArmy
Hi Taylor; welcome to Hadit. EED's can be totally confusing. You can be denied, receive an amended amount on appeal and yet still have an incorrect amount awarded, etc. Some my disagree, but with your
ShrekTheTank
Hi taylor, The BVA will take a closer look at your claim and it will probably take them some time. I somewhat agree with GBArmy, but I would wait until after the BVA renders a decision as it could al
paulstrgn
Hello Taylor, I agree with Shrek, wait until after you go to the BVA for they may grant you everything you are looking for. If not as stated by GB and Shrek then get a lawyer. The main thing is d
12 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now