Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

BVA Appeal / Lawyer Needed or Not?

Rate this question


Vetrequest

Question

Is it recommended that I hire a lawyer for a BVA appeal?  This will be my first time appealing to the BVA.  What occurrs at this hearing?  Who asks me questions?  Is there a role for an attorney at this hearing?  Wanting to know what to expect and how difficult it was for those who've been down this road. 

Thanks..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Adminstrator

Personally I would not recommend one at the BVA.  I went at it with the VFW and had some good results.  I am now at the CAVC with a Lawyer as the attorney fees are covered at this part.

With that being said I have the energy still to fight them, and I understand not everyone does.  It is your call do hire a lawyer, but the help from this site is amazing!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

If you are appealing a Board decision (to the CAVC) dont even think of doing so without a lawyer.  

Reasons:

1.  CAVC awards eaja (lawyer fees) so it wont cost you anything.  

2.  CAVC is NOT "Claimant friendly" like BVA, they expect you to know the rules, and to abide.  The CAVC does not do benefit of the doubt, you have to show the preponderance of evidence supports your position.  

3.  CAVC is not a "trier of fact", they correct legal errors made by the board.  So, if you dispute the Boards judement call (rating percentage, etc), the CAVC does not overturn that UNLESS a "fact finding" made by the board is "arbritrary and capricious".  

4.  You will be expected to prepare a "brief" (at a minimum) and, well, its just unnecessary for you to try to be your own lawyer at CAVC when eaja pays the fees.  This said, you "can" file a NOA (not a nod) at the CAVC level, and then retain an attorney if the 120 day deadline is very close, and not enough time to obtain legal representation.  

 

      IF you are appealing "TO the BVA" then you can self represent.  But if you are appealing a BVA decision, get a lawyer.  I agree with Shrek in that you can appeal TO the board yourself, but its unclear in your post whether you are appealing "to" the Board, or appealing a BVA decision TO the CAVC.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I would say its the individual personal decision. I had filed a claim and I use VFW as my rep. Bless my VA rep heart, she did a great job. But for some reason, I kept getting denied. My VFW rep filed the NOD for me which she would not do if its not a strong claim and again denied. It take a long time to do research  for an individual claim which she service ample amounts of vets on a daily basis which only limit the time for maybe 10 minutes per person.

So of course the SOC had come in and being that she was swamped, I had made that decision to lawyer up which is at the BVA level. Yes you do have to pay attorney fee's but this particular attorney does not accept a fee until the claim is awarded which is 20 Percent.

Just like anything else with the VA, you have to spend a little money to get your deserved proper rating. I had made a decision to go this route instead of going and paying thousands of dollars to get an IMO/IME with a possibility of still getting denied.

Do not get me wrong, our VFW's/DAV's (which I am a life time member of both) etc are doing a great job but I think that they are over worked and can not keep up with the workload as far as claims and other things.  But its pretty much a crap shoot. You may have good support from your rep, maybe not. So what do you do? Fire that rep and get a new one? That might delay time being that the new rep has to get familiar with your claim.

Thats why I made the decision to lawyer up at the BVA level and yes its a crap shoot for me as well but I will never quit. Once I do have my hearing, they BVA may look at that yes I have an attorney as my rep so hopefully the BVA will pay more attention to detail to my claim instead of RO's looking at it briefly. Just my opinion though.

I am sure that there are other members on the board like Broncovet and Berta have different insight. They are much more experienced than I am and we can all learn lots from them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I went to the BVA the first time and won with the help of the NCOA.  Ten years later I went to the BVA again and decided to hire a lawyer because the VA was playing fast and loose with the laws and CFR's in my case.  Only you can make this decision but know that the service organizations are usually busy and can not always give you the time a lawyer can, it just costs you 20% of your award usually.

I do not believe we should have to hire a lawyer or get expensive IMO's but sometimes that is what it takes.  It's a lot better than the old days when we could not hire a lawyer by law.  Those were some dark days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I would hire a lawyer. Just some background info in my claims process. I got denied on several contentions when I first filed my claim except for one - 20% combined rating for both knees. 

It was the least documented disability in my SMRs - only two instances of one complaint to sick call and my separation physical exam where the physician diagnosed me with PFS on both knees.

My migraine headaches and severe depression are the most documented disabilities on my SMRs and VA treatment records but I was denied. Filed a NOD and sent in new and material evidence of an IME w/IMO from a board-certified specialist, and got denied once again. My lawyer immediately faxed VA Form 9 to intake to appeal to the BVA.

At the BVA hearing, my lawyer will present a letter citing VA rules, regulations, and other similar cases about how my claim has been unfairly rated by the RO given all of the favorable evidence and how the RO does not apply VA’s own CFR’s.

The above is powerful because you have someone competent presenting your claim before a BVA hearing judge. I would think the BVA hearing judge would take your claim more seriously compared if you went with a VSO.

Edited by Hucast21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, vetquest said:

I went to the BVA the first time and won with the help of the NCOA.  Ten years later I went to the BVA again and decided to hire a lawyer because the VA was playing fast and loose with the laws and CFR's in my case.  Only you can make this decision but know that the service organizations are usually busy and can not always give you the time a lawyer can, it just costs you 20% of your award usually.

I do not believe we should have to hire a lawyer or get expensive IMO's but sometimes that is what it takes.  It's a lot better than the old days when we could not hire a lawyer by law.  Those were some dark days.

It seems a lawyer and an IMO are the only winning chance a veteran has in most cases.

The only claim I know of personally that was granted on initial file was my friend’s. He filed his claim right when he was separating from service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use