Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Why Is the VA Requesting That I get a new C&P exam after I appealed their effective date of my disability decision?

Rate this question


Rambo123

Question

Here is my Va dilemma. First of all, I have been fighting the VA since 1994!  I have since been granted small disability increases until I finally was granted an increase from 90% to 100%.  During this long arduous and challenging struggle,  I have filed disagreements and a Form 9 to Veteran Board of Appeals (VBA).  Next,  VBA  has remanded my claim back to my local VARO because there was so many disparities the VARO raters either deliberately missed, or missed because of being overwhelmed by so much work they are facing. Personally it appears to be both. Here is my question: After finally being granted the 100%, the VARO raters decided the make my disability effective date  the date of my most recent C&P exam, which was just a few month earlier.  While I was elated about the award, they were a few years off for the effective date!  They changed my diagnosis from that recent exam, and said that was the first time I got this diagnosis, and based their effective date on the apparent new diagnosis.  However, what they failed to recognized, was I already had that new diagnosis for several years prior. Therefore, I again disagreed and filed the proper form stating my disagreement with the effective date.  I made it specific that I ONLY want to appeal the effective date,  So after several months of not doing anything with my claim, they are trying to request that I get a new C&P exam for an "Increase disability"  They have all of the evidence, such as progress notes, medical treatment and even other C&P doctors  stating that I had that new diagnosis.  I don't feel that I need a new C&P exam!  What do you think about all this?  I am so sorry for all this writing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Rambo 123 Sorry that you have been getting the run a round but as you realize, it is confusing trying to deal with the VA. The short answer is that they feel that there is clarification to be had by having a review at a new C&P. It is further development. Maybe, it has something to do with the conflict between the diagnosis/effective dates? You didn't say when you are scheduled, but I assume it is fairly soon. You should know that it is important to be sure you attend; otherwise you could be denied. You could try to contact the director at the RO who schedules the C&P's and state your reasoning for it not being necessary, but short of that go to the exam and see how it falls out. If it is bad, you can always appeal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Actually this new C & P exam may not be a bad thing. It could have a result in you getting an earlier effective date for your 100% rating. It could also get you a P & T rating which could generate a retro payment and or extra benefits like CH 35, DEA Dependent Education, waiver of life insurance and other benefits that come along with being rated P & T. So It is not necessary a bad thing to have a new C & P exam.  We all have to go through it. As you stated that your progress notes are up to date, just keep going and it should go well.  Now if for any reason VA tries to reduce any of your ratings make sure you appeal. If VA grants you the wrong effective date, you can still appeal to.   

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

I agree with the answers above.  Think of it this way.  You go to a c and p exam, say March 1, 2019.  The doc says you are totally disabled but does not give a date.  (often).  So, the va uses the exam date.  

    Understand what this means.  On Feb. 28, 2019, you are fine..no disabilities.  You go to an exam, and poof, you are 100 percent disaled.  Gee what did that doc do to you to make you disabled?  

    Instead, your doc should have said, "records show" you have been disabled since mm-dd-yy.  For example, that effective date may have been when you sought,

     You will need a new exam, but I recommend its worth it for this exam to be done by a doc on YOUR payroll, not the VA's .  

     I fought my (100 percent) effective date, and won, eventually, but only with lawyers fighting for me, and, yep, IMO's.  

     Its my opinion if you dont want to spend the money on imo's you wont get it.  HINT:  Some lawyers will up front IMO cost if they think you will win with an IMO.  My lawyer did.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Make no mistake.  

The va will fight you harder on the effective date than they did granting your disablities.  This is due to MONEY> 

    Most raters dont have the authority to cut you a 100,000 check.  So they just deny them.  You are gonna have to go before a judge, and he has the authority to cut you a six figure check.  But, that judge was a lawyer, and he wants you to hire a lawyer too.  

    In short, if you want your full retro (eed), get a lawyer.  I have been on this board over 10 plus years, and, never once did anyone ever win six figure retro represented by self or vso.  You need big guns, so get a lawyer.  Or, go home and settle with what you have.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
42 minutes ago, broncovet said:

Make no mistake.  

The va will fight you harder on the effective date than they did granting your disablities.  This is due to MONEY> 

    Most raters dont have the authority to cut you a 100,000 check.  So they just deny them.  You are gonna have to go before a judge, and he has the authority to cut you a six figure check.  But, that judge was a lawyer, and he wants you to hire a lawyer too.  

    In short, if you want your full retro (eed), get a lawyer.  I have been on this board over 10 plus years, and, never once did anyone ever win six figure retro represented by self or vso.  You need big guns, so get a lawyer.  Or, go home and settle with what you have.  

i am about to win retro pay for OSA back to 2008 with bva and i used VSO. but i used my states VSO that provided me a free lawyer! this is sound advice, @broncovet. most VSO's out there i have tried were junk. i am currently using Virginia Department of Veteran Services! they are incredible. have been johny on the spot with everything. if you live in Virginia and you are using another VSO you are waisting your time and your tax dollars on poor help with the VFW and DAV, imho.....

Edited by blahsaysme2u
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use