Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Heart Attack Secondary to Depression, Should I appeal?

Rate this question


dbgrace1970

Question

Forgive me if this has been asked previously.  I am trying to navigate the site and did not find anything searching for it.  I am currently service connected at 50 percent for depression, listed as MDD and Anxiety.  Had a heart attack last year. STEMI.  CAD diagnosis.  In discussing lifestyle changes, I was asked what my stress level was as far as job, home life, leisure, prior health, etc.  Stress is high and depression is thick and real.  Was told that the depression and anxiety COULD be a contributing factor and Id want to be as stress free as possible.  Applied for secondary heart attack, due to depression and anxiety with VA.  had C&P exam.  Saw doctor (contractor, QCV or something) for five minutes in which he said nothing to me.  looked at computer screen, typed some things up, and excused me.  Was later denied..."It is less likely than not that the veteran has a  diagnosis of CAD with MI requiring stent placement that was proximately due to to MDD, anxiety, or OCD.  There is no medical evidence that MDD, anxiety, or OCD cause CAD".  

There are numerous studies performed by the VA, Mayo, and universities and agencies worldwide that connect CAD with depression as a cause and a symptom.  Several rulings have already stated as much.  I have requested the records from the C&P ( a month or more ago) and have yet to receive them.  Deadline for appeal is coming up quickly.  This new system sucks.  I used to just go to the regional office in Lincoln and theyd let me walk out with any copies I needed.  Question, Is it worth appealing on the grounds I have listed in this paragraph?  And is there a way to get a doctor to look at my records on my own and see if they agree that its AT LEAST AS LIKELY that the two area linked?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
12 minutes ago, broncovet said:

I agree, BUT:

Whoa, Hoss!  In some circumstances CAD is presumptive!!!  READ this to see if its a presumptive for YOU!  

https://cck-law.com/types-of-va-disabilities/ischemic-coronary-artery-disease/

If you were exposed to Agent Orange, and have been diagnosed with CAD, you should be able to get benefits for it.  See the link above.  

Thanks Bronc.  Wouldnt be presumptive for me, I discharged in 1990 with no AO exposure.  That being said, did spend time on Chanute Air Force Base, which is now a superfund area, I believe, and was designated one shortly after I left there. But I just received a phone call from my cardiologists office.  He has received the request to look at the records and determine if it is AT LEAST AS LIKELY or better.  They'll get back to me tomorrow.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Berta may have a list of places for presumptives.  Im not sure, as I said, Vietnam is one.   I think there is another list of presumptives for asbestos, for camp lejune, and probably more.  

https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/publications/agent-orange/agent-orange-2020/presumptive.asp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Make sure the doctor follows the IMO /IME criteria here at hadit:

Basically the doctor should use those key words, "at least as likely " as due to the SC MH issue, ,and give a full medical rationale which they can support with any strong internet treatises  or abstracts.

Also hopefully they will have a copy of that C & P exam and can point out how inaccurate it is.

Also what kind of Doctor did the C & P exam?

Your Cardiologist should be willing to give the VA a 'curriculum vitae' or a strong description of their cardio expertise.

I was remanded for a Cardio opinion by the BVA many years ago (am widow of Vietnam vet)

and I got a C & P by a PA. I knocked it down medically myself and the BVA gave it no weight and 

awarded on my 3 IMOs ( and additional extensive evidence)

There is nothing wrong with PAs or nurses but they are not qualified to opine on cardiac issues.

Vets have proven their exposure to AO in many places outside of Vietnam. to include CONUS, and by being on ships within the 12 mile limit of the coast of Vietnam during the war, as well as certain crew members of C 123s, who were exposed to the contaminated planes.

 

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

UPDATE:  Got a letter from my private doctor, a cardiologist.  Letter stated that connections between depression and heart attacks are well known and well documented and it was  AT LEAST AS LIKELY AS NOT that my heart attack was caused by service connected depression and anxiety.  I filed the appeal on October 15.  I am set for ANOTHER C&P for this Friday, but already received the enclosed letter.  I cant believe they already adjudicated the IU and the P&T. before I even have the next C&P.  And how have they gotten that far before I even get the results of my previous C&P, which I requested in Late August?  My original claim in 2011 only took four months to approve and close.   

 

IMG-8655.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Another UPDATE:  Appeal was filed, second C&P exam was performed.  That nurse told me that she thought I should be checked for COPD due to smoking for years.  I told her that was fine and all, but not what I was here for, and I've never been told COPD might be a problem.  Had a quick exam, and a couple of weeks later received a letter from VA stating they service connected the heart attack at 10 percent, with the mandatory 100 percent rating for 3 months following myocardial infarction.  But weren't done adjudicating because the C&P notes " are not clear and have been returned to the provider for clarity".  The letter went on to say the rating may go up once the notes are cleared up.  I'm assuming its because she included notes about COPD.  So waiting to hear the final decision.  All in all, im pretty impressed, as always, with Nebraska's RO, regarding the minimal amount of time they take to reach decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use