Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Bad Rating issue

Rate this question


LadyMC

Question

I filed a claim. Did a session with a private psychologist and was diagnosed with ptsd. Went to a c and p exam and the examiner did not accurately reflect all of my symptoms. Was given a low rating. Went back to the private psychologist who reviewed my c and p exam paperwork and concluded that one part was inconsistent with another part. He said that VSO scheduled another c and p exam. Just did that one. The va is calling it a request for increase rather than a dispute of the original claim. Below is the letter from the private psychologist after reviewing my case decision   

C1D22C34-9369-48F7-821C-EBE2EC07C447.thumb.jpeg.415f6279d94a0f70cf448bf492017fd7.jpeg
my question ....  they already sent me back pay to the date of my claim but at a much lower rating than the psychologist says I should qualify for.  If it is increased with this latest c and p exam, will I still get back pay for the difference back to my original claim date? 

Edited by LadyMC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

"in accurate"

I hate spell check.  The spelling is correct, but the grammar is wrong.  Either that or, when it was transcribed, the transcriptionist lacked proper grammar training.  Should read, "inaccurate".  

I bring this up, not because it has anything to do with your post, but because of my OCD, it sometimes find it hard to continue reading.

Also, my wife was a medical transcriptionist and doctors can and do make up words.  

LOL,

Hamslice

My mother and now my daughter are English teachers.  Poor is me.    

Edited by Hamslice
cause I can

“There is no hook my friend. There's only what we do.”  Doc Holiday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

A "dispute" of an original claim is filed on a nod form.  There are 2:  20-10958

or https://www.va.gov/vaforms/va/pdf/VA10182.pdf

If you did NOT file a nod, then its probably a claim for increase.  However, all is not lost!

There is a special rule that will give you up to another year when you apply for an increase.  The regulation is here:

Quote

 

(3)

The effective date of an award of increased compensation shall be the earliest date as of which it is ascertainable that an increase in disability had occurred, if application is received within one year from such date.

Its found here:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/5110#:~:text=4688.]&text=The effective date of the award of any benefit or,marriage%2C birth%2C or adoption.

 

And:  Its not to late to file a nod preserving the effective date if your decision was within a year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

''the psychologist says I should qualify for.  If it is increased with this latest c and p exam, will I still get back pay for the difference back to my original claim''

Yes you should get retro from when you first filed or when they first recieved your claim.

I agree with broncovet  read up on those regulation he put up.

.  There are 2:  20-10958-59  These are the NOD  Notice of Disagreement

They should have  mention this to you if you were denied?  remember   you only have 1 year to disagree withem. from the date you received your denial

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

What rating did you actually get? However you appeal it I would try and get as much new evidence as possible.  You could get another IMO for instance.  Your original psychologist probably knows other shrinks in the business that he/she could refer you to.  When I got my TDIU way back in 2001 I had three IMO's.  It did not cost me that much and the IMO's just got better and better.  I would just surround the VA with evidence so there is no way they can shoot down all your contentions. Overkill is not a bad word when dealing with the VA.  Did your claim involve statements from your significant others? I remember I had to appeal my first lowball rating and then the TDIU denial and finally a denial of P&T.  I would have hired ten shrinks to win my case I was so pissed off.  Way back yonder before the Afghan and Iraq war it was much harder to win PTSD and mental health claims. If you even get 30% for PTSD you have your foot in the VA's door and then it is just a matter of gaining evidence to get where you want to go.  I went from 10% to 100% but I got there and so will you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use