Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Routine Future Examinations (RFE) - Compensation and Pension Exam.

Rate this question


rob.ram9593

Question

Hello everyone,

I have not been able to find much information on routine future examinations (RFE). I did not apply for an increase or any new claims. I have a RFE scheduled for bilateral knee instability a little after 5 years of service connection. My understanding is that this is supposed to be an evaluation of the current severity of symptoms and if the disability continues to be a problem and to what extent. I asked the person on the phone making the appointment and she said to be prepared to discuss my event in service and why I think it is service connected. I don't understand why veterans would have to discuss the event in service again and why they think it is related to their current disability if the nexus has been established.  

My experience has always been that the C&P examiner will not look at any of my records during the examination and if I insist, the rest of the exam does not go very well. I had to appeal a denial due to a bad C&P the first time around and it took a while for them to service connected.  

My plan was to let him know from the start that this is a re-evaluation, but the moment you try to manage the situation, it can go very wrong for you. All I'm looking for is a fair chance to explain what is going on with me currently and fully comply with VA requirements. The problem is we barely have any time with the examiners and you must make every minute count. 

Does anyone know what happens during these re-evaluations?

Is it appropriate to go back to event in service and how it is related to your disability?

Should the C&P examiners at the VA know that this is a RFE and not a new claim?

Should I bring anything with me since they almost never look at documents? 

I appreciate any feedback anyone may be able to provide on this. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Adminstrator

It is like a new C&P.  They will go over how you have been and what issues you have had.  They will do ROM and you need to tell them when it hurts.  Not when you are at the point you can't take it anymore.  They are looking to see where the pain is at, but if you don't tell them they might miss it.  

They may or may not know if it is  new exame or not and it really does not matter as they will be given what to look for and what to ask about.  As for paperwork, if you had a medical probelm with it I would bring that information.  If not you should be ok.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Rob.Ram5953 The clerk on the phone is uninformed. If your s-c for over 5 years it is a RFE Routine Future Exam. They want to see if your condition has gotten any better or worse. It's not necessarily a bad thing at all. If your conditions have gotten worse, then you may get an increase in rating. Don't get into an adversarial situation with examiner about your file. Try asking something like "doc, did you see that ... as reported by my doc shows ...; that's on a doctor visit I had and should have been entered in my file? If you didn't see it, I have a copy right here for you." They don't have to take it, but sometimes they do. Just do your best-no arguments. Another thing,if you condition is rated the same by the examiner, ask him or her, "say doc, since it hasn't gotten any better or worse over the last 5 years, can you put in a suggestion for me to make it a static condition? They could. It is a win-win for you. If they do make it static, you shouldn't have any more RFE. If your condition gets worse and you chose to open it up for an increase, you can put in a claim for an increase in your rating. You'll do fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Just answer his questions the best way you can and honestly. 

He may or may not ask you about how you got this disability due to your military service  that's already been proved  so its Illravlant.

You might want to be sure and let the examiner know how you feel on your most bad day  and without pain meds  you could not  get by your daily routine ...let him know you have to take your pain meds to make it through the day, if you feel your disability has got worse  you might want to go see a private Doc  to examine you and ask the Doc for his medical opinion/assessment  if he thinks your disability has got worse ?

just as this C&P Examiner will he will examine you and he is looking for your disability to show an improvement... take your private Dr's report   if this examier is trying to say your disability has improved  the show him your private Dr report  or his medical opinion  on your s.c. Disability.

This may not be as bad s you anticipate just go with the flow.  like GB ARMY  AND SHREKTANK MENTION THIS MAY LEAD TO AN INCREASE IN YOUR DISABILITY  IF YOU CAN SHOW IT HAS GOT WORSE.  IF NOT  THEN TIS EXAMINER MAY SAY IT'S ABOUT THE SAME.

 

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use