Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Reasons for BVA to Grant and Deny single issue?

Rate this question


Confusedvet1

Question

Hello,

Years ago I filed a claim for a scar from surgery while in service. They granted the scar at 0% . I appealed it saying it was painful and should be rated at 10%. RO denied it so it went to the BVA who remanded it back to RO because the original exam wasn't proper and the VA didn't review records it had that were pertinent to claim. The BVA remand instructions were to review specific records and do a new exam.

I had a new exam and later received a letter from RO saying they granted me 10% but the effective date was the date of new exam. They said that is the first diagnosis of scar pain even though my records going back years show me complaining of pain which is why I suspect BVA told them to review those records. The RO decision letter stated the only used the new exam as evidence for their decision.

So it went back to the BVA and it seems they made a decision. I'm waiting on the letter but website said they granted my claim and also denied it? 

 

Any ideas on how this is possible?

 

I'm hoping it's a grant for earlier effective date and denial of an increase in excess of 10%? Anyone have any ideas on what they would grant and deny same claim?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Confusedvet1 It is what  the VA does. You have to wait to receive the decision letter. You can check VA.gov for recent payments and see if you got back pay. You can also check the "Letters" section and see if you are now rated 10%. But basically, we have to get the letter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Some of us Vet advocates dont want to speculate on "when ebenefits means when they say....", and Im one.  You will have to wait for the letter.  

However, its possible this could both be sort of granted and denied.  (sort of).  

They may have denied an effective date (back as early as you sought) but could have awarded an earlier effective date for a different date. 

At least 2 reasons this "could" happen:

1.  Remember, your effective date is the later of the "date of claim" or facts found (the date the doc said you were disabled).  We dont know "what" date you first reported to the doctor that your scar was "painfull".  It could have been before, during or after the date of your initial claim.  So, check when the doc said you reported a painful scar.  

2.  Often overlooked is the following regulation, which could render you an EED for up to one year:

Quote

(3)

The effective date of an award of increased compensation shall be the earliest date as of which it is ascertainable that an increase in disability had occurred, if application is received within one year from such date.

Source:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/5110

     There could be other reasons for a different effective date.  If you still dispute the effective date, after you get the decision, you can appeal it to CAVC (if you appeal a board decision within 120 days).  Or, if a varo decision, you can appeal it to the BVA> 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks all. I'll just have to wait. I read the guidelines for RO on scar pain and they aren't supposed to award it until the veteran says it hurts at exam. They say that is objective evidence even though examiner can't know for sure and goes by what veteran says. But if veteran complains not to examiner then it's subjective evidence which makes no sense. 

 

There are plenty of complaints of pain prior to me filing original claim so hopefully my assumption is right. 

The RO didn't even complete remand instructions specifically reviewing and considering evidence the judge told them to review. I base this on the letter that said what evidence they considered. 

So I guess I'm still hopeful that it's moot if they gave me earlier effective date.

 

Like you all have said, I guess I just have to wait and see. 

 

My effective date hasn't changed for the scar issue online but I'm assuming that would take weeks or months to happen anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Interesting side note for others. According to VA policy if you call them and tell them you received the letter and have questions then they can talk about the decision letter with you. If you say you haven't received it yet then you have to wait 10 mailing days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Ok so I finally got my letter in the mail today. The judge denied in excess of 10% for scar which is what I expected and thought should happen and granted the issue that I should be entitled to an earlier effective date.

However they didn't give a specific effective date. He didn't remand it either and nothing on VA.gov is open for claims or appeals and effective date hasn't changed. 

 

Does that mean RO is working on new effective date or did they forget to do something and I need to talk to someone to make it happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use