Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Top 10 claim mistakes not to fall for. Dont take bad advice!

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Lead Moderator

We are often given bad advice on our VA disability claims, by VA employees, VSO's, or even well meaning hadit members.  However, if a hadit member posts bad advice, mostly others challenge it, and even correct it.  This rarely happens with VA employees or VSO's advice.  

Here are my top 10 bad advice statements: (Dont make these mistakes)

1.  If you apply for an increase, you will be decreased instead.  Its actually difficult for VA to reduce you, especially if you refuse to roll over and allow them to do it. 

Source: 38 CFR 3.344

2.  "Wait" until issue "A" is completed until you apply for "issue B".  This costs Veterans retro.  Your effective date cant be earlier than the date you applied.  (Exception:  If you apply for benefits within a year of discharge, you can get an effective date back to your date of discharge)

3.  Ignore letters VA sends you.  They often contain deadlines for additional evidence, or other deadlines.  Keep VA up to date on your address, you may not get letters you need to have!  

4.  Solely relying upon information a VA employee or VSO tells you, especially if it smells fishy.  If you smell fish, chances are good there is a dead fish nearby.  Give the advice the "smell test".  

5.  Solely relying upon information "you were told".  I cringe whenever I hear "I was told...."  Usually, this precedes bad information.  Check this information on hadit, review the CFR's to see if its consistent, or check the VBM (Veterans Benefit Manual) instead.  Remember, neither VA employees (nor  VSOs)  nor politicians keep promises 100 percent of the time.  VA will not hold accountable an employee who gives you bad advice.  

6.  Not reading your decision.  Bad idea.  How do you know whether or not to appeal it?  

7.  Not reading or knowing whats in your cfile, and guessing instead.  What did your doctor say?  Did he WRITE DOWN what he said in his office?  Find out and read it.  Its your claim. 

8.  "NOT" enlisting the services of a professional (lawyer or claims agent) when necessary.  For example if the retro potential is large, or your claim is complex.  Your bias against attorneys can often cost you money.   Hiring an attorney "does not" always cost you money.  In fact, it should never cost you money...you should get more, much more, with an attorney than without him.  While there are many circumstances when an attorney is not necessary, such as your initial claim, when you dispute the decision you got, its a great time to consider your options as far as a representative goes.  Not all Veterans have the resources or skills to do their own claim.  Did you know that some law firms will "up front" the costs of an IMO in order to win your claim (especially when the Vet can not afford an IMO).  Incredibly, there are many "Pro Bono" law firms (such as NVLSP) which do not charge Veterans for their services.  Also, EAJA (Equal access to Justice Act) pays many/most Vets attorney fees at the CAVC level). 

9.  Poor reasearch/no research.  Chances are great other Vets have had a similar issue before, and its already been decided by the BVA or CAVC.  You can check to see what happened to them so that you either dont make the same mistake as they did, or you can do it the way they did and succeed.  

10.   Giving up too soon.  If you truly feel that you deserve the benefit sought, there is a great time to give up:  NEVER!  Persistence often pays off when giving up does not.   

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
14 minutes ago, GBArmy said:

Squanto In no particular order a short list I would start with is CC&K, Hill and Ponton, Woods and Woods, The Veterans Law Group and Perkins. The issue is often they have a lot of work and they tend to specialize in certain area more than others and sometimes that leads to better representation in certain areas, such as MH and PTSD. Google your disability and see if any of the more reputable lawyer groups have a video or on-line article on it. Certainly ask more than one and ask about their success rate and especially your disability.

Currently I have asthma at 30% (which I think should be higher) and some others at 0%.  But I currently suffer from depression and I'm having difficulty convincing the VA it started on active duty.  Are there any recommendations for lawyers for this?  I'm in the San Antonio area if that matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Squanto Don't get too tied up in geography; a lot of this stuff can be resolved without going in person to the lawyer. You need an IMO from a psych doc that can diagnose a MH condition and tie it into your in service event. If they can do a dbq, much better than depending on the VA to provide for you. If you get a lawyer, they will suggest going to a doc that they have referrals to to provide those things. Do you have anything in the service that shows mood changes etc, as evidence while in service? STR's and other medical records that will support you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Squanto Don't get too tied up in geography; a lot of this stuff can be resolved without going in person to the lawyer. You need an IMO from a psych doc that can diagnose a MH condition and tie it into your in service event. If they can do a dbq, much better than depending on the VA to provide for you. If you get a lawyer, they will suggest going to a doc that they have referrals to to provide those things. Do you have anything in the service that shows mood changes etc, as evidence while in service? STR's and other medical records that will support you? As for the asthma, look up diagnostic code 6602; it is based on how your symptom rate against the criteria. See https://cck-law.com/blog/va-disability-ratings-for-asthma/ Never request an increase for a service connected disability if your symptoms don't match up with the symptoms of the next higher rating. So, compare what your conditions are and decide if they really do add up to a higher rating. You can also get a specialist to do a qbq for those symptoms. You would google dbq for asthma or whatever you are trying to increase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

My advice is there "is a line in the sand" where you need a lawyer.  For me, this line is very clear:  After a bva denial.  

I can understand, however, there are circumstances when you should have an attorney "at the Board".  Ask youself these questions:

1.  Do you have the resources to appeal?  You need an internet connection, some skills such as internet searches. You should be able to write a concise letter.  

2.  Are you well enough to appeal?  If you are sick,or have mental disorders where you dont accomplish necessary tasks, then you should consider an attorney.   Rememeber appeals last a long time, so you have to be able to "finsih" your appeal.  

3.  Are you committed enough to invest the time and money (yes money) to appeal?  Yes, it often costs money.   Money for postage, envelopes, and often copies.  A VBM is around $240, and is a worthwhile investment for pro se claimants.  You may have to attend hearings, and have the resources to travel to the hearing location.   And, importantly, you may need an IMO/IME to win.  If you dont have the money to pay for an IMO/IME, sometimes attorneys will upfront the costs for you.  Hill and Ponton has been known to do this.  

4.  Are you organized?  Can you keep copies of decisions, medical exams and be able to find them when needed?  Not everyone can do this.  You may need help here, if you know you are weak here.  

5.  Are you persistent?  Appeals are a marathon, not a sprint..more like running from Seattle to Florida.  You cant give up and expect to win.  

     If you lack one or more of the above, consider representation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I wanna add to the list.

1. Filing claim without C-File or medical records.

2. Failure to know rating criteria for disabilities.

3. Not knowing benefit of a medical specialist vs general medicine doctor or nurse practitioner.

4. Failure to have a reliable VSO to ask questions

5. Non adherence to CALUZA standard.

6. Being stubborn.  Trying to make a square peg fit into a round hole.

7. People stating the process is easy.

 

Lastly, there is no magic pill for securing VA benefits.

Medical facts are the key.

You need supporting medical documentation (current diagnosis) and documentation regarding the effects of the disability.

You can't effectively claim a disability unless you have information.

Medical facts are the key.

Your energy and concentration is paramount to success. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Don't forget the extremely important "Intent to File" process. It is crucial to preserving a potential effective date while wading through VA red tape and attempting to collect medical records, buddy letters, and other correspondence before actually initiating a new claim, including survivors pension and DIC.

https://benefits.va.gov/BENEFITS/factsheets/general/intenttofile.pdf

 

If filing a claim for increase, simply go through your medical evidence over the past 12 months and see if you can find proof that you qualify for the next higher level of disability. It's a good idea to do your homework on these up front, if possible, so you have hard evidence for them to verify. If your condition or the next higher level of disability is deemed temporary and expected to improve, I recommend you ask around or check with a VSO for advice before doing this. 

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use