Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

100% P&T and a question...

Rate this topic


drago

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
21 minutes ago, cwatson said:

I would not take the time trying to pursue another condition that was not related as a secondary or otherwise because I am experiencing the VA trying to reduce my ratings, but they cannot succeed because I have too many sources and proof. 

There are some VA employees, VSOs and others say that once a veteran reaches 100% there is nothing else, but it really depends on that veterans' medical health and records. SMC payments are normally granted after a veteran reaches 100% or TDIU so there are more benefits. It still would be very hard for the VA to prove a veteran's disability (IES) has improved once the veteran has been rated.

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Everyone,

Thanks for the replies to this. I wanted to do a follow-up and ask yet another question.

The background on my ischemic heart claim is I was experiencing shortness of breath and some chest discomfort.  I went to the cardiologist who recommended a stress test.  I failed the stress test, was diagnosed with ischemic heart disease and was sent for a cathertization for most likely a stent.  Following the cathertization, the doc (who was always in a hurry), said I didn't need a stent and "everything went fine".   So, I thought I had ischemic heart disease, but didn't need a stent.  I had a yearly follow-up today with a different doctor in the practice who took some time and talked me through what had actually happened.  Turns out I had a false positive on the stress test showing a blockage when there in fact wasn't one.  The cathertization showed no blockages, and therefore I am not currently diagnosed with ischemic heart disease.  So "yay" on that... at least one part of me is ok.  But that's why part of the documentation I have shows ischemic heart disease and another part of it says I don't have it.

Question then... do I just call up the VA and stop the eval process for ischemic heart since I literally do not have it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Drago..

    You are somewhat new, but we suggest a new topic when you have a rather unrelated question.  You can get more answers that way, because people familiar with IHD, may well not be as familiar with 100 percent P and T, etc.  But, I will answer anyway, but, in the future, I recommend starting a new topic.  

     I "almost never" suggest withdrawal of a claim.  I would not in your case.  While a current diagnosis "is required", different doctors could diagnose stuff differently.

     Even worse:  The doc who said you dont have IHD could be wrong..and that could be a tragedy for your family..by withdrawal of that claim.  You see, if you die from a SC condition, your spouse can get DIC, and IHD can easily become fatal.  Another doc may well dispute that doc's opinion who says you dont have it.  There was likely a reason why doc number one diagnosed you..and you probably dont know all those reasons, either.  

      As an example, doc 1 could say "you dont have IHD", but you have (insert another heart condition diagnosis, instead).  But if you withdraw it, you would likely be withdrawing that one also.  

     My advice is simply to continue the claim, wait for a decision, and THEN, if denied, decide if you want to persue an appeal.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 2/26/2022 at 5:25 PM, pacmanx1 said:

There are some VA employees, VSOs and others say that once a veteran reaches 100% there is nothing else, but it really depends on that veterans' medical health and records. SMC payments are normally granted after a veteran reaches 100% or TDIU so there are more benefits. It still would be very hard for the VA to prove a veteran's disability (IES) has improved once the veteran has been rated.

I would definitely pursue the ischemic heart disease.  A friend received it as an "s" SMC award and the that put him over 160%,which currently is about $300+/- monthly, in addition to your monthly 100% or TDIU pay.  I won mine for housebound, retro 31yrs, because I didn't give up.  Go for it!!!  It'll help pay for that new electric car the gov't is trying to make us all buy. jmo  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Anything that might kill you should probably be pursued.   Where is my electic car by the way?  I got an extra 60% for the heart.   If you have a serious disability even if are 100% pursue it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use