Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Is there a regulation stating BVA remands are required some sort of a quicker VA rating decision?

Rate this question


63Charlie

Question

I don't have any of the rules or regs. 

 

My C&P exams were done on my remands two months ago and there is no movement(rating decision).

Feels like the VA raters put my stuff on a shelf to collect dust.

 

I'd like to kick-start things as my issues are obviously gathering dust waiting on a rater to decide.

Is this only a pipe dream?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Very often in the many many BVA and CAVC court decisions I have read the judge will always say near end of decisions that the VARO is to expediate his/hers remand instructions in a timely manner.  I do not remember the exact wording but can easily find with a good search. 

In actual fact this priority or expediated treatment of remands does not occur. Case in point is like you I have now been waiting many months on VARO to issue a decision on a BVA remand concerning my appeal for IHD heart disease increase. Since I already have everything including SMC-S this is not of great importance to me but still noticeable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Unfortunately, it takes the VARO several months before they make their decision, I would guess about four to six (4 to 6) months. About the only thing you can do is to keep checking with your local VARO 1 (800) 827-1000 number. You can also submit an Ask/Inquiry request to check the status of your claim or appeal.

Ask.VA.gov | Veteran Affairs 

P.S.  I had a BVA remand that went to the VARO and sat for a year and finally it was recertified back to the BVA. At the time I contacted the BVA when their number was still connected, and they made a new order, and my appeal went back to the VARO where it sat for six months, and I finally contacted the White House Hotline number 1-855-948-231 and ask WTH, and they created an inquiry complaint, and my decision was completed, and my award was deposited within thirty (30) days.

P.S.S. Due to the fact that there are many BVA and CAVC remand decisions, there is no real thing as an expedited claim/appeal unless you have some type of hardship, and many veterans do these days or some type of medical emergency.

Edited by pacmanx1

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

See I starting to understand these delay things a little better.

Expidate what does it really mean there no time limit. So the VA has a open door with the time to complete a remand from cavc or bva. Smh.

If you have a cavc ir bva remand and it send back to ro.

It is to be return to bva at the front of the line.

Your Not to start over the appeal back to bva. This add years to some remands. 

They tell veterans they need to do a new VA form 9 or nod to have the appeal return to the board.

This ladies and gentlemen put you at the end of the line with a new docket number.

The bva irt cavc remand docket number they are to expidate has been removed.

You now have a new appeal stream started.

I can't make this up they try it with me an I did a writ.

And they made decision in one month to end my writ before the court could address anything.

Or there games.

But they mess up and never merger the appeals back with the cavc remand docket number.

So the court had to merger 3 appeals back with there cavc remand docket number and order.

Do you think anyone has address any of this. No. Lol.

So I think the short answer is I would call the white house hotline.  An do a complaint.

At least they will have to answer them or maybe get things back rolling.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Here is an example from one of my BVA remands to the VARO from the late 90s:

Quote

This claim must be afforded expeditious treatment by the RO.  
The law requires that all claims that are remanded by the 
Board of Veterans' Appeals or by the United States Court of 
Veterans Appeals for additional development or other 
appropriate action must be handled in an expeditious manner.  
See The Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act of 1994, Pub. L. 
No. 103-446, § 302, 108 Stat. 4645, 4658 (1994), 38 U.S.C.A. 
§ 5101 (West Supp. 1997) (Historical and Statutory Notes).  
In addition, VBA's ADJUDICATION PROCEDURE MANUAL, M21-1, Part 
IV, directs the ROs to provide expeditious handling of all 
cases that have been remanded by the Board and the Court.  
See M21-1, Part IV, paras. 8.44-8.45 and 38.02-38.03.

It describes the instructions to the VARO which are typically do more development (research, C&P, etc...) or take action on it.

I guess if everything is to be handled expeditiously, then every veteran is at the front of the line. However, given the circumstances I truly hope that they place elderly vets, those at risk of hardship, and terminal vets in front of those.

 

 

 

 

 

 

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
3 hours ago, Vync said:

Here is an example from one of my BVA remands to the VARO from the late 90s:

It describes the instructions to the VARO which are typically do more development (research, C&P, etc...) or take action on it.

I guess if everything is to be handled expeditiously, then every veteran is at the front of the line. However, given the circumstances I truly hope that they place elderly vets, those at risk of hardship, and terminal vets in front of those.

 

 

Thanks, Vync.

I thought there was this type of reg. that applied to remands.

 

 

 

 

Edited by 63Charlie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

@63CharlieIt has probably been updated at some point, but that's all that I have ever received both times in the 90s...

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use