Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

One Condition = 60%= 100% Tdiu

Rate this question


Guest jangrin

Question

Guest jangrin

If a veteran has a condition with multiple SC ratings but the VA combines them for the purpose of TDIU and they equal 60% disabling --will that then qualify the veteran to the TDIU? For example,

PN (feet) bilateral 21%

Heart (CAD) 30%

DMII 20%

HTN/HBP 10%

________

60% - Does this then mean that because all the individual disabling processes are combined under DMII for TDIU thus making this veteran eligible for TDIU at 100%.

But then also if these disabling processes continue to worsen they also are rated serately in the event the verteran asks for an increase in the rating for any of these SC conditions.

Please correct me if my thinking is wrong on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
If a veteran has a condition with multiple SC ratings but the VA combines them for the purpose of TDIU and they equal 60% disabling --will that then qualify the veteran to the TDIU? For example,

PN (feet) bilateral 21%

Heart (CAD) 30%

DMII 20%

HTN/HBP 10%

________

60% - Does this then mean that because all the individual disabling processes are combined under DMII for TDIU thus making this veteran eligible for TDIU at 100%.

But then also if these disabling processes continue to worsen they also are rated serately in the event the verteran asks for an increase in the rating for any of these SC conditions.

Please correct me if my thinking is wrong on this.

jangrin, read 38 CFR 4.16b for your answer.

pr

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jangrin

Aren't all of the SC'd listed in this post related to a condition of one etiology?

Wouldn't that qualify as 60% (one etiology) =TDIU I would think that one could ask for a reconsideration if denied TDIU because of DMII and complications of secondarys.

§4.16 Total disability ratings for compensation based on unemployability of the individual.

(a) Total disability ratings for compensation may be assigned, where the schedular rating is less than total, when the disabled person is, in the judgment of the rating agency, unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation as a result of service-connected disabilities: Provided, That, if there is only one such disability, this disability shall be ratable at 60 percent or more, and that, if there are two or more disabilities, there shall be at least one disability ratable at 40 percent or more, and sufficient additional disability to bring the combined rating to 70 percent or more. For the above purpose of one 60 percent disability, or one 40 percent disability in combination, the following will be considered as one disability:

(1) Disabilities of one or both upper extremities, or of one or both lower extremities, including the bilateral factor, if applicable,

(2) Disabilities resulting from common etiology or a single accident,

(3) Disabilities affecting a single body system, e.g. orthopedic, digestive, respiratory, cardiovascular-renal, neuropsychiatric,

(4) Multiple injuries incurred in action, or

(5) Multiple disabilities incurred as a prisoner of war.

he SC'd disabilities related to DMII (one common etiology)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

jangrin, what is the ejection fraction on the last heart cath. Was it less than 50.

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jangrin

according to the nuclear perfusion 59. The VA in Cal would not do a heart cath. The new doctor here in TEX has chuckles scheduled for new EKG and then she will address the heart cath. She has also increased HBP meds, DMII meds, mental health MEDS, and HTN meds. also took new blood and a second urine sample. Also has scheduled him for a doppler for his leg and feet circulation this next week.

Obviously things have gotton worse sense he was last examined but it took five months to get into the VA here because he is not SC'd yet. He finally got in during the last two weeks. But now the claim is suppose to have been rated and they did not get all this new information.

I think he will be low-balled on this rating. So I am planning on a reconsideration and I will send in all the new medical evidense from the new VA doctor here in TEX.

It is frustrating because if he had his appointments 30 days sooner the rating board woud have had all this new information.

Oh well, it won't be long just wondering about if they rate him as 60% I really think that is what is going to happen.

Jangrin

Edited by jangrin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest RickB54
If a veteran has a condition with multiple SC ratings but the VA combines them for the purpose of TDIU and they equal 60% disabling --will that then qualify the veteran to the TDIU? For example,

PN (feet) bilateral 21%

Heart (CAD) 30%

DMII 20%

HTN/HBP 10%

________

60% - Does this then mean that because all the individual disabling processes are combined under DMII for TDIU thus making this veteran eligible for TDIU at 100%.

But then also if these disabling processes continue to worsen they also are rated serately in the event the verteran asks for an increase in the rating for any of these SC conditions.

Please correct me if my thinking is wrong on this.

No.... this is wrong.

a veteran must be rated 40% for one disability with a combined rating of 70%

or

a veteran must be rated 60% for one disability (not a combination of disabilities)

It is possible but unlikely that a veteran who does not meet the requirements listed above could get TDIU, but for that to happen a decisions would have to be made in Wash DC. It does not happen very often.

In one of your post you indicated you think he will be given a low-ball rating. Why do you feel this way? I am always bewildered when someone makes a statement like this, like there is some conspiracy against veterans. Such nonsense. VA employees are good hard working people, some make mistakes but we all do. Help the veteran with his claim, and give the system a chance to work, because most of the time the system works well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use