Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Claim Denied...retro?

Rate this question


walt

Question

I am starting to work on getting service connected again.This time I intend to be as informed I can and

submit a solid claim.I am getting a pension from va.

I have three Questions please. 1)Can I re-open this claim if I have new and convincing evidence,or since I did not appeal will I have to re-file? 2)Will I have the date of protection they speak of or no because I did not appeal? 3) Is there anyway I can find out if in fact the va ever did get my records?I HAVE CONTACTED ST. LOUIS AND THEY TELL ME THEY HAVE MY RECORDS SO I SHALL SEE.

I filed a claim in Feb 2000 and it was denied in March 2001.This is what the denial shows. Evidence---Notice from NPRC that they fowarded veterans service medical records to regional office on Aug 4 2000. These records have not been received. Medical evidence submitted by the veteran--Treatment records from va medical for periodMay 1992-May2000.

The reason for decision states..The veteran has verified service from March 7,1966-Dec 1968 and Aug 10 1971-Aug 29 1975.He reported service from 1976-1981and from May 1983-Oct.1983 however there is no

evidense this was honorable active service.

The veterans service medical records were requested from NPRC March 3 2000. NPRC advised they mailed records Aug.4 2000 but they have not been received.If they aresubsequently received.the claim will be reconsidered with date of claim protection.

The veteran has submitted evidence showing he was examined on July 1 1998 and shown to have hypertension well controlled.Hospital summary from va medical center for period June 6-11 1999 shows the veteran has hypertension.

I have a letter from NPRC saying they had loaned records to va and one from va saying they had not received them.

They denied three other conditions besides the one above. On two of them they They clearly said, veteran has submitted evidence showing I was diagnosedwith the condition and on what date. The dates were periods of active duty.Could it be because of not having verification of the two periods of active service?In the analysis para pertaining to hypertension it states ..Service connection may be granted for a disability which began in military servicr or was caused by some event or experience in service. service connection for hypertension is drnied since this condition neither occurred in nor was caused by service. although service connection may be presumed for hypertension if this condition is manifested to a compensable with a certain peorid after discharge.Service connectionon this basis cannot be favorably considered because there was no evidence showing hypertension was manifested to to a compensable degree within one year following discharge.

Walter A. Brazelton SR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

MT-

Maybe they meant "deferred" meaning they are still working on this claim-

You said he was retired from the military- I dont know how this will affect his CRDP-

Have you checked into the CRDP regs?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use