Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

How To Handle This?

Rate this question


lbrady

Question

The VA denied claim for depression/anxiety again, saying that I had submitted medical evidence in support of my claim, but that it was not material evidence. I noticed that they are still not giving me credit for much of my military service. I had sent in a chronological dates of service/medical history chart as well as the form showing cumulative duty and retirement points. This was not listed as used when considering my claim on letter by VA. I'd be interested in your suggestions on next moves. Is it in my best interest to send in all my dd 214s as new evidence? Or file nod? Also, the medical evidence was letter from phychologist determining that My 'personality disorder' was mst as based on her experience. Do I need to file for mst since it was submitted as new evidence for anxiety? TIA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I can only address the DD 214 aspect of your claim. Didn't you submit ALL your DD 214s with your original claim? I have five DD 214s due to prior service and reenlistments. The DAV ensured that all were submitted with my original claim. If you haven't submitted them, you should.

Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA denied Claim for depression/anxiety (again), saying that I did not show material evidence. The medical evidence was a new letter from a psychologist determining that my 'personality disorder' was MST, based on her professional opinion. Do I need to file for MST since it was submitted as new evidence for anxiety?

*Under §3.156 New and material evidence [provides] ... A claimant may reopen a finally adjudicated claim by submitting new and material evidence. New evidence means existing evidence not previously submitted to agency decisionmakers. Material evidence means existing evidence that, by itself or when considered with previous evidence of record, relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim. New and material evidence can be neither cumulative nor redundant of the evidence of record at the time of the last prior final denial of the claim sought to be reopened, and must raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 5103A(f), 5108)

*In my opinion, you did provide evidence that is New but not Material to your original claim. HOWEVER, the new evidence you provided shows an IMPLIED claim for MST. This would be your date of claim. Do you feel confident about proving an MST claim or do you feel more confident about proving your original claim?

I noticed that they are still not giving me credit for much of my military service. I had sent in chronological dates of service/medical history chart as well as the form showing cumulative duty and retirement points. This was not listed or used when considering my claim.

TIA

*If I were you, I would think about filing a new claim for MST. Your original claim has already been denied twice and if you appeal now, it's going to go to the BVA. If you can prove an MST Claim, you can use all the same evidence you've already sent - to your advantage, to prove symptoms of MST. Othewise, you've got to get the psychologist to opine that YES you do have Anxiety and Depression related to military service . . . You have options. Just thinking out loud, others will follow. Keep fighting. ~Wings

Edited by Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

lbrady,

I was diagnosed with a personality disorder and discharged. The diagnosis was based on superficial investigations and bogus. I was almost killed during an aggravated assault that occured while I was sleeping in a barracks. A psychological history was shown in my SMR of one and a half years of somatization, anxiety and problems sleeping in the barracks which caused me to move off base. No other sources of stress were claimed even though the doctors tried to get me to say that other things were causing the stress. I had no problem getting the diagnosis changed to PTSD 25 years after discharge (PTSD was not a diagnosis in 1970). The VA did not accept the diagnosis as being due to military service because there was no police report or record of any witnesses to the assault. In other words I could not prove the stressor.

Although the histories taken by military shrinks were superficial there was enough information for me to convince several VA shrinks that the record supported a diagnosis of chronic anxiety disorder at the time of discharge. The VA changed the diagnosis and service connected me. It really depends on the reports you have from the military and how the doctors write the current reports in suport of your claim.

If it were my claim I would seek a very specific opinion based on the DSM IV. Having a shrink say that the record supports a diagnosis of MST based on their experience may not be sufficient. I got a copy of my SMR and listed all the symptoms noted and cross referenced them to specific requirements of a diagnosis of anxiety disorder shown in the DSM IV. Then I got the VA shrink to write a report showing the exact relationship between the DSM IV and my SMR. In other words I did their work for them and had them agree or diagree with me.

I was 20 years old at the time of my discharge. I sought a rediagnosis 25 years later. Adjudication offered no support and their denials were written in such a way as not to tip me off as to how to fight them. They were just blowing smoke with vague comments that I did not prove my claim. Their denials could have been much more specific. One thing I knew for sure is that I had a reaction to almost being killed by some idiots in the barracks and that the personailty disoder was a bogus diagnosis. Fortunately, there was a significant amount of reports written by my CO, dispensory doctors and three psychiatrist in my SMR for me to use to win my claim. I was denied three times before I figured out what type of statements I need to get from the doctors. Most of my SO's were useless. I went through 3 SO's.

I was able to get all the reports I needed from VA shrinks and it did not cost me a penny. It can be done.

Edited by Hoppy

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Do I need to file for mst since it was submitted as new evidence for anxiety?

lbrady,

You really need to get a good service officer to help you with this claim. Whether or not you have the diagnosis of mst may not be the issue. It could be more important to show that the mst is connected to PTSD or an anxiety disorder. You will have to get the personality disorder diagnosis changed to a service connectable diagnosis. Sometimes they will service connect if the symptoms noted in service are shown to be early symptoms of more severe symptoms that developed later. There are many psych conditions that develop differently over time. I have found some links between mst and PTSD. A shrink would need to develop such links and write a good report based on the DSM IV. I am not sure that mst is in and of itself a diagnosis listed in the DSM. It could just be a name used to describe events that occur in the military. If you need to research this, ley me know.

To establish PTSD due to events in the military a stressor needs to be developed. If you do not have police reports and or other types of evidence of traumatic events in the military then there are guidelines in the M-21 manual to show secondary evidence of a stressor. I think it is in chapter 3. Like I said in the beginning, a good service officer should know this stuff.

If the PTSD does not go through because of the lack of evidence of a stressor then the diagnosis of an anxiety disorder could work. I got the shrinks to give me a dual diagnosis of PTSD and anxiety disorder and the let the DRO try to figure it out.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have a copy of your C-file? If not, get one. Do you have documentation of the MST? If so, I'd say refile for PTSD due to MST. I don't know if you would be able to ask for an earlier effective date or not. Someone might address that on this post if they can. Hang in there and know that hadit is here for you and will help in any way. I am 50% PTSD due to MST. I started at 10% and went to 30% and now I am at 50%. If there is documentation of the MST you should have no trouble, but if not, the VA will fight you on it. I hope this helps, just remember we are here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use