Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (als)

Rate this question


ZenArcher

Question

I am a Gulf War vet '92 - '00 with service in the Gulf for the Operation Southern Watch, Deliberate Force, Allied Force and Noble Anvil. I was diagnosed with ALS '07 at the ripe old age of 38. I do not have documented symptoms in my medical records but have supplied personal testimony, a corroborating buddy letter, letter from my wife and sister in law stating that I had cramping, twitching and fasciculations during the last two years of active duty service. I also provided a letter from the Director of Neurology and head of the ALS clinic in Hershey stating that the symptoms "most likely represent the initial stage of the illness."

I have also included multiple studies and exposures showing increased risk of developing ALS and studies showing that the time from disease onset to diagnosis can exceed 10 years. I then provided appeals cases showing connection with contradictory symptoms, no symptoms, exposure to unknown substance and diagnosis after 35 years.

I received my denail which states, "In the absence of evidence to show that this condition was incurred in service or aggravated by service or manifest to a degree of 10 percent or more within one year of discharge from service, service connection is not established." The did not address I am working with the PVA but in all honesty they have done little more than act as a mail courier to date. I have open files with both my congressman and senator as well as letters of inquiry from the White House.

I have contacted Dr. Barson concerning an IMO but have not heard back yet. I would appreciate any suggestions. I would also like to know does the one year to submit additional evidence before the claim is closed change following another denial? What I mean by that is my initial claim was place in May 2007 and denied in June 2007 so I had until June 2008 to submit additional evidence. I did so and was the awarded for tinnitus and a thumb fracture but again denied ALS this May 2008. Does that mean that I have until May 2009 now to submit new evidence for ALS and the claim remain open?

Jeff

If you think you're too small to make a difference try going to bed with a mosquito.

SMC R2 due to ALS

Vice Chairman ALS Association Veterans Issue Team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Zen Archer, I hope you understand what these folks are trying to tell you.

ALS and other neuromuscular diseases sych as Huntingtons, Spinal Muscular Atrophy are similar.

Keep in mind the Neuro. Dr Bash is a Neuro Radiologist. He is the Expert on Putting the results of your illness on paper and make you a difinitive timeline. He will sumarize the records. That means he will put the claim in order and place the EMG's, Scans, Xrays, Mri's in your favor.

When dealing with claims for illnesses of this magnitude, You need a sound opinion from an expert.

A Neurologist is a good one but It takes an expert to decipher the tests involveds and thats where Bash Comes in.

Ask him if he will work with you.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand and appreciate the push. Based on what I've been told here I intend to speak with Dr. Bash again.

Jeff

If you think you're too small to make a difference try going to bed with a mosquito.

SMC R2 due to ALS

Vice Chairman ALS Association Veterans Issue Team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the initial initial denial was June 18, 2007 - does he have to file an NOD by June 18,2008 (like kind of quick)regardless of whether he submitted more evidence?

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thurday ( June 12th) HR 5454 is being discussed at the H VAC hearing available via PC at

http://veterans.house.gov

This bill would provide service connection for veterans with ALS presumptions- also included in this bill is Project SHAD.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

free_spirit

I received another decision which connected me for tinnitus yet denied me for ALS and it states on there that I have until May 2009 to submit additional evidence.

Berta

I'm the guy testifying so wish me luck. This is a horrible disease. Of the 2,091 vets that joined the VA ALS registry over a 4 year period only 900 remain.

Jeff

If you think you're too small to make a difference try going to bed with a mosquito.

SMC R2 due to ALS

Vice Chairman ALS Association Veterans Issue Team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
My original ALS claim was submitted, May 2007, and denied in June 2007, so I had until June 2008 to submit additional evidence.

I did so, and was the awarded for tinnitus and a thumb fracture but again denied ALS this May 2008.

Does that mean that I have until May 2009 now to submit new evidence for ALS and the claim remain open?

It means you must file a VA Form 9, and appeal to the BVA. It means you have about 30 days to file that Form 9!!

It also means that, in that Form 9, you can ask for a reconsideration at the DRO Level, at that Regional Office; and you can ask for a personal hearing before the claim is certified to the BVA.

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use