Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Inferred Tdiu

Rate this question


Berta

Question

I just found in the VBM (2007) NVLSP some unusual information-

Page 1480-

Their point is that some vets who 'inferred' TDIU in some way and if VA ignored the TDIU inference, might be eligible for better EEDs.

"Essentially,when evidence is received that indicates the veteran may be entitled to TDIU,the VA is obligated to develop that claim.If the TDIU claim is pending the VA must adjudicate it like any other claim.If,hwever,it is determined that the TDIU claim was finally adjudicated as part of a claim for increase,even though the issue of TDIU was not specifically discussed,then the only recourse is to attack the decision on the basis of clear and unmistakable error."

I think they are saying- say a vet files for PTSD and DMII in 2002.

Then- only until 2005 does the VA rate him at 70% SC and send him the TDIU form and then they grant TDIU back to the date they get the form back.

But say this vet "inferred" in his original 2002 claim that he had lots of on the job problems and believed he is unable to work due to his PTSD as it made him unable to deal with superiors and he was presently unemployed.

This would be an inferred claim of TDIU that the VA should have adjudicated-as I understand NVLSP- or -if the decision on his claim is final-even if he was granted TDIU but with the 21-8940 form date as the EED- a CUE claim could be prepared to get back the 3 years of retro that-if the CUE is successful-the VA still owes him.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

According to the VBM just the fact that you have any SC condition that could make you unemployable is an inferred claim. They used an example of a vet with a smelly foot problem. How much more of a good claim is it to be on SSD? If the VA knows the vet is on SSD for an SC condition that should be an inferred claim for TDIU with an effective date of the time they found out about the SSD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

OK the last question I have on this matter. Say the VA did not know a Vet was on SSD although I find it hard to believe that. Can a Vet ask the VA to pay back to SSD award anyway?

Edited by Pete53

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK the last question I have on this matter. Say the VA did not know a Vet was on SSD although I find it hard to believe that. Can a Vet ask the VA to pay back to SSD award anyway?

Pete,

Isn't there a rule or reg concerning VA and SSA sharing information without the claimant even having to sign and submit a release?

Anyone out there know where it is?

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the one from Social Security:

http://www.socialsecurity.gov/OP_Home/cfr20/401/401-0120.htm

§401.120 Disclosures required by law.

We disclose information when a law specifically requires it. The Social Security Act requires us to disclose information for certain program purposes. These include disclosures to the SSA Office of Inspector General, the Federal Parent Locator Service, and to States pursuant to an arrangement regarding use of the Blood Donor Locator Service. Also, there are other laws which require that we furnish other agencies information which they need for their programs. These agencies include the Department of Veterans Affairs for its benefit programs, the Immigration and Naturalization Service to carry out its duties regarding aliens, the Railroad Retirement Board for its benefit programs, and to Federal, State, and local agencies administering Aid to Families with Dependent Children, Medicaid, unemployment compensation, food stamps, and other programs.

It is kind of odd - my husband was the disabled person - but I don't see any Social Security records about him in his C-file. However, there is a one page transmittal on ME - checking to see if I had applied for and / or been approved for Social Security benefits. It was just a one page trasmittal sheet. I did not sign any consent - and I did not use the joint application for VA / Social Security that they use for Survivors ( we CAN file a joint application for both benefits) I informed them that I was filing separately, but they still pulled up a sheet on me.

If they can pull up info from Social Security to see if you are NOT eligible - they SHOULD be able to pull it up to see if you ARE eligible.

I read a case for a child survivor - and the BVA remanded it because the VA had not requested the child's Social Security records to see if the child was disabled.

Free

Pete,

Isn't there a rule or reg concerning VA and SSA sharing information without the claimant even having to sign and submit a release?

Anyone out there know where it is?

carlie

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"OK the last question I have on this matter. Say the VA did not know a Vet was on SSD although I find it hard to believe that. Can a Vet ask the VA to pay back to SSD award anyway? "

I dont see how-

What bothers me is that I have met a few vet reps (even the one I had from the DAV) who did not see the significance of having an SSA award solely for service connected conditions and sending it to the VA as evidence of TDIU or 100%.

SSA disabilities awards are, in essense, independent medical opinions.

The VA can only address the evidence they have.

If the veteran states they are on SSA the VA is obligated to send them an authorization and to obtain the SSA records.

Washington V Derwinski

I went round and round with VA on this years ago when they refused to obtain my husband's SSA records.They told my COngressman and my 2 state Senators that SSA refused to reales the records.

It simply wasnt true.

I called SSA in Baltimore, determined to find out what was what-only to find that-although the VA had the authorization forms signed-they had never even attempted to get these records.

This is one reason my husband never saw his 100% award in his lifetime.

But my point is a veteran cannot say the VA failed to address any SSA evidence-if the VA had no knowledge the vet was on SSA for disability.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need to add Bell V Derwinksi-

this case defined what the VA ,after July 1992, needs to have for CUE claims.

Basically the VA must have "construction possession" as of July 1992 of any evidence that is involved in a CUE Motion.

If a veteran attempted to file CUE claim on SSA records that VA did not consider as to their disability- the VA must have had "constructive possession" of those records after July 1992.

I have discussed Bell here before.

I raised Bell in my CUE claims presently at the VA-

since the situation involved claims that dated back to 1997-1998-decision-and evidence up to and after 1992 was a factor in those awards-

I raised Bell in my CUES and reminded VA that all of the evidence had been in the veteran's C File and medical records after July 1992 and thus VA had "constructive possession" of it all.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use