Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Sec Puts The Spin

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Recent VA News Releases

http://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel

VA Tightens Protections for Veterans Paperwork

Peake: Lapses "Unacceptable," Procedures and Accountability Tightened

WASHINGTON (Oct. 16, 2008) -- Secretary of Veterans Affairs Dr. James B.

Peake vowed swift action after a handful of documents related to

veterans' applications for financial benefits from the Department of

Veterans Affairs (VA) were found among documents identified for

shredding. The documents, which were not duplicated in government

files, could have affected veterans' eligibility for benefits.

"I insist on the highest possible standards for processing and

safeguarding information in VA's custody," Peake said. "It is

unacceptable that documents important to a veteran's claim for benefits

should be misplaced or destroyed."

Peake said VA's Office of the Inspector General (IG) is investigating

the misplaced documents, and anyone who violated Department policy on

protecting documents will be held accountable.

The documents were discovered by employees of VA's IG office during an

audit at three of VA's 56 regional benefits offices, which process

applications for disability pay, VA pensions, educational assistance,

home loans and similar financial benefits.

IG auditors found a handful of documents waiting to be shredded, which

might have affected the fate of veterans' applications. The documents

were returned to the proper offices for processing.

Retired Rear Adm. Patrick W. Dunne, VA's Under Secretary for Benefits,

immediately directed all of VA's regional offices to suspend all

document shredding while IG and VA officials determine whether the

problem is more widespread. Directors of the regional offices will have

to certify in writing that no original copies of key documents or

records from veterans' cases under consideration are being destroyed.

VA has procedures for determining the disposition of paperwork.

Original copies of discharge papers, marriage certificates and death

certificates are returned to veterans or families when no longer needed.

Duplicate copies of paperwork no longer needed are appropriately

destroyed to protect the privacy of veterans and their families."

A "handful" my butt)

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
Greetings all:

Lets put this "handful" into perspective. I deal with Federal grants everyday. They audit on a sample. If during your audit 5% of your sample has invalid expenses they take back 5% of the total funding your institution received for that same period.

Now a handfull is hard to quantify, Ricky's, Josephine's or Jbasser's files are probably safe since clearly they could not be one handed (handfull) even by Wilt Chamberlain! :rolleyes:

For arguments sake lets say a handfull was 5, if five peoples files hit the shredder bin in detroit every day we would destroy 1,825 files a year or 10.7% of the current total C&P pending (17,037) at Detroit VARO. Lets say Detroit is twice as bad as any other VARO except New York. I think somone mentioned New York was caught doing this in 1987. So that gives us an approximate twenty one year practice.

Claims destroyed per year (1,825*2)+(912*54) = 52,898

Clearly a 21 year practicer 21*52,898 = 1,110,858

Clearly these numbers have some statistical flaws (VA doesn't work 365 a year)!

However, It does demostrate even a handful is serious evidence of the injustice that veterans have been facing for years.

People need to go to jail and someone in the major media should call Peake on the carpet for "a handful", he knows how many veterans were affected and how many pages of documents were in those bins. Disclosing that number does not violate any veterans confidentiality or privacy.

Best regards,

Tyler

PS I have written both senators, and my Representative. I have asked for a meeting with my representative (wont happen).

Great Post! Chilling reality!! ~Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I guess that is their way of reducing the backlog. It also saves postage. why even send a denial letter when it can be gone.

I wonder how many of those poor folks claims were awaiting processing and the Vet passes away.

Tyler, Great post. Keep up the good work.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that VARO's have put all shredding on hold, this would be a good time to do preventative maintenance on the shredding machines. This would help prevent future break downs of the shredding machines. We wouldn't want the VA to miss any original military medical records or claims. I would hate to see them fall behind in the shredding. This could also give them more time to haggle over some cut and dried presumptive Agent Orange cancer they could possibly cheat some dying vet or widow out of. I used to believe the fire at the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis was an accident...Naaaah! They wouldn't do that, would they??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

This is the most sickening thing I have ever heard of.

How much lower can the VA stoop????

I used to, many years ago, think they were my friend, but it didn't

take me long to find I was in for the fight of my life.

I know now why I had to repeatedly turn papers in and turn them

in again.

I sent my Personnel Records three times to the AMC and when they

received word from the ST. Louis Archives, they were lost, they were

ready to accept that answer.

Boy, did I let them know real fast, I had the originals

of the three copies that I had sent them myself, mailed to me

from the Archives.

I had to jump through hurdles to keep my records in my claims file.

I have triple copies of everything in my file, just to be safe.

Always,

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Founder

here's a link to the news stories on this, it just pmo - like it's not hard enough already, these chuckleheads can't even do some quality assurance :P

http://news.google.com/news?ie=UTF-8&o...hreds+documents

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • keepmovingforward earned a badge
      One Year In
    • kidva earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use